Why can’t the bureaucrats be this honest?
The following dialogue between myself and Dr Chris Neil took place in the Senate Excess Death Inquiry.
It shows why there needs to be an inquiry into Covid outside the Senate estimates process whereby Labor collude with the bureaucrats to lie.
Dr Neil is a practicing cardiologist and has a PhD in Cardiomyopathy.
While the dialogue doesn’t cover anything that hasn’t been covered before it does show the difference between speaking with a professional doctor who sees patients on a daily basis and the bureaucrats in the TGA.
Whereas the bureaucrats are only interested in covering up their incompetence, Dr Neil has not been afraid to give a more honest assessment about issues around the vaccine rollout.
The current Senate estimates process isn’t working as the government colludes with bureaucrats to cover up their incompetence rather than work as a transparent process to shine a light on government decisions.
Committee on 13/06/2024
Community Affairs References Committee
Excess Mortality
Senator RENNICK: Have you read the TGA non-clinical evaluation report?
Dr Neil: Yes, I have.
Senator RENNICK: That’s nice to know because a lot of the government officials haven’t. You’ll be familiar that on page 19 they optimised the codon sequence in the mRNA strand to increase the expression of the spike protein. I was always told that vaccines were attenuated, that is, weakened, to give you a smaller dose or a lesser toxic dose of the virus, not a strengthened dose. Why, if you’re trying to develop a vaccine, would you make the concentration and the expression of the pathogenic part—the spike protein—stronger, not weaker? Does that make sense to you—and I’ll add that this vaccine used two lipids, ALC 0159 and 0315, which were designed to increase the transfection potency of the vaccine. There are two questions here. Why would you make a vaccine that’s stronger, and why would you make a vaccine that can enter any organ of the body—not just an organ with an ACE receptor, which is what the virus could do, so this is more infectious—including the heart? I presume myocarditis is caused by the spike protein entering heart muscle. There are two questions there, if you don’t mind.
Dr Neil: I would emphasise that at the time of the introduction of mRNA vaccines into the market there was very little in print delving deeply into the multiple new aspects of the vaccine. Some of that which was published was misleading, for instance, that the vaccine would simply stay as an intramuscular injection and operate from that site, or perhaps moving into the lymph nodes, et cetera. We now know, as you said, that the lipid nanoparticle disseminates and, therefore, carries the mRNA and other nucleotide contaminants into cells all around the body. So, it has the capacity to be introduced to organs which one would not expect to be exposed to a protein such as the spike protein. You mentioned methylpseudouridine, the way in which the synthetic mRNA was modified to prolong its duration. That led to an unknown of how long this spike protein would be produced. We know there are many assurances that it would only be produced for a few days, but in many independent, peer review articles we find examples of spike protein, which is vaccinal and not viral, persisting for months and, in one case, 200 days. These are things which I feel were not really represented to the medical public well.
You mentioned myocarditis in your question. It’s a complex pathogenesis, but it does appear that it is the result of spike protein being expressed in the tissue of the heart and then provoking both an injury and a secondary autoimmune injury. That raises a point that all organs that might be affected by presumed or suspected vaccine injuries can actually be studied with simple techniques to see whether, in fact, the spike protein has been produced as a result of vaccination. By the same token, there are protocols for ensuring that’s not the virus. That’s something which could have, I think, brought more clarity to what we’ve seen.
