If Lyndall Dean can be prevented from hearing vaccine cases, then why are other commissioners allowed to hear vaccine cases who have prejudicial and uninformed views about the risks of the Covid19 vaccine? In Jovan Jovcic and Filip Markovic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2022] FWC 1931 Deputy President Coleman states in paragraph 39 that ATAGI status as an expert body that provides advice to the government and public cannot be seriously doubted. What sort of a joke is this? (a) What is the point of an independent commission if they just assume the government and its advisors are infallible? (b) Deputy President Coleman then goes on to state in paragraph 40 that ATAGI said that vaccination was an intervention to prevent transmission. This statement from ATAGI and therefore Deputy President Coleman is unequivocally wrong. There was never any testing by Pfizer that showed the vaccine stopped transmission. This was admitted by Pfizer in the European Parliament in October as well as the FDA as far back as December 2020. The FDA and Pfizer have both said it is unclear how long the vaccine provides protection. Given Deputy President’s Coleman misstated facts what will Fair Work do to rectify this? This error of judgement is further compounded by the fact many of the ATAGI experts work for organisations who are funded by big pharmaceutical companies. They clearly have a conflict of interest that can impair their judgement.