Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

204. Studies have shown that the weight of the protein produced by the mRNA vary by as much as 50% – surely this is evidence that the mRNA is not being produced in a consistent manner by the ribosomes? Is the TGA tracking the product being produced by the ribosomes? 221. Why is TGA/Pfizer calling it mRNA when it isn’t mRNA – the use of Methylpseudouridine means it’s a different substance does it not? 267. Which part of the mRNA code directs it to be processed on the ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum – could the TGA please state the name of the amino acid and what position the amino acid sits on the mRNA strand? 289. Is pseudouridine impervious to the mRNAse, the enzyme that breaks down mRNA?

184. Can the TGA provide a breakout of its revenue stream by organisation? 205. Leaked emails from the EMA show they lodged a Major objection with Pfizer, namely that the possibility of translated proteins other than the translated protein resulting from truncated or modified mRNA should be addressed. Were these concerns addressed? The European Medicines Agency’s COVID-19 Vaccine Leaks: Hacks, Regulatory Pressures And Manufacturing Concerns – Health Policy Watch (healthpolicy-watch.news)

96. There is no evidence that the blood lung barrier will allow IgG antibodies which weight around 150,000 Daltons to cross from the blood into the alveolar space of the lungs where Covid is infecting the epithelial cells. Given this is the case why do authorities claim the Covid vaccine can fight Covid which is present in the lungs? 97. I note that the TGA non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine showed there was very little difference in lung inflammation after 8 days in between vaccinated an unvaccinated monkeys. Given they weight 10kgs and got three times the dose of humans on what basis did this trial proof the vaccine was effective noting there was an IgG response for only 35 days. I note the weight to dose ratio for the monkeys was 20 times higher than humans so on that basis there may have been an IgG response for two days (35/20) or a lower IgG response.

135. Given the TGA failed to review the gene technology around the Pfizer vaccine did the TGA seek advice and analysis from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator before approving the Pfizer vaccine which involves gene technology? If not why not? 136. Was the TGA required to get authorisation from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator before approving the Pfizer vaccine? 137. Did the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator provide analysis to the TGA for either of the Astra Zeneca or Pfizer vaccines? If so, could copies please be provided.

45. Why do people have to lodge a FOI to get serious adverse event data from the TGA – shouldn’t it be made available with weekly reports? I refer to FOI-3520 that had to be lodged in order to get the total number of serious adverse events following Covid-19 vaccine injections? 46. Can the TGA point out where on the weekly reports are the total of serious adverse events listed as per John Skerritts comments in estimates that they are listed? There is nowhere that specifically states how many of the total adverse events reported are serious.

115. There are fifty adverse event reports in children under 17 years old for Moderna Spikevax (100 ug of mRNA) and roughly the same amount in the 5 to 11 year old group where an adult dose of 30 ug was given instead of the provisionally authorised 10 ug all since January 10 – Feb 3. That’s roughly 100 children incorrectly given a much stronger dose and unauthorised for their age. What is the TGA doing about the administrators of vaccines giving wrong dosage amounts to children. I note Phase I dose finding studies halted the 30 ug dose in the sentinel group after a safety committee deemed it too unsafe to continue in that dose for that age group? 217. Why did ATAGI approve the Pfizer vaccine for children given it wasn’t powered to detect rare adverse events? 218. How can ATAGI guarantee that there will no long-term adverse events in children if no long-term testing was carried out on the vaccine? 219. How can ATAGI guarantee that there will no long-term adverse events in children if no long-term testing was carried out on the vaccine? 220. There have already been reports of severe adverse events in children aged 5-11 that weren’t detected in the initial children’s trials including strokes, tardive dyskinesia, chest pain, myocarditis and pericarditis. Given the large number and the broad range of adverse events will ATAGI withdraw its recommendation that the vaccine be rolled out to children?

128. Has the TGA assessed the risk of, and presence of micro-RNA sequences comprised within the Pfizer vaccine? 129. Has the TGA assessed the risk of and or presence of Stop Codon read- through arising as a result of the use pseudouridine in the Pfizer miRNA active ingredient? 130. Do the mRNA strands have stop codons embedded in them? If not, how will the cell stop producing spike proteins? 131. Has the TGA tested the quality of the mRNA strands in the vaccine to determine how many are mal-coded or damaged for every given inoculation? 132. Can the TGA guarantee that no other protein is transcribed by the mRNA vaccine other the purported Covid-19 spike protein? If not why not? 133. How many mRNA strands are in one dose of the Pfizer vaccine? 134. How can Pfizer/TGA guarantee that each does of the Pfizer vaccine will have the same number of mRNA strands?

Senator RENNICK: Okay; that’s fine. When you review that data, can you please tell me how many people in the placebo trial were hospitalised, how many in the inoculation trial were hospitalised and how many died in the initial Pfizer trial?Dr Skerritt: Senator, we’ll put the data on deaths in the placebo and active arm as an answer to a question on notice.Senator RENNICK: I know the answer to that now; it’s actually zero and zero, because the initial Pfizer trial had no clinical outcomes in terms of hospitalisations and death and it had no-Dr Skerritt: Senator, I do not believe that is correct.Senator RENNICK: In the initial Pfizer trial, in the six-month data, there are different numbers, but-Dr Skerritt: Senator, I do not believe that you are correct-Senator RENNICK: Okay. We can move on.Dr Skerritt: I’m happy to, on notice. I do not believe that the Pfizer trial for the COVID-19 vaccine lacked data on hospitalisations. I do not believe that your assertion is correct.Senator RENNICK: Okay. I did not say it lacked data; I asked how many went to hospital. I’m asking you how many went to hospital and how many died in the inoculation group and the placebo group.Dr Skerritt: We will provide that information on notice.Senator RENNICK: Could you also provide subclinical outcomes regarding clotting and inflammation.Dr Skerritt: We’ll provide that additional information from the trial data, on notice.Senator RENNICK: Yes, on the initial trial data and not the six-month trial data.Dr Skerritt: Yes, on the initial. As long as-Senator RENNICK: Okay. Thanks, Chair.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

204. Studies have shown that the weight of the protein produced by the mRNA vary by as much as 50% – surely this is evidence that the mRNA is not being produced in a consistent manner by the ribosomes? Is the TGA tracking the product being produced by the ribosomes? 221. Why is TGA/Pfizer calling it mRNA when it isn’t mRNA – the use of Methylpseudouridine means it’s a different substance does it not? 267. Which part of the mRNA code directs it to be processed on the ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum – could the TGA please state the name of the amino acid and what position the amino acid sits on the mRNA strand? 289. Is pseudouridine impervious to the mRNAse, the enzyme that breaks down mRNA?

184. Can the TGA provide a breakout of its revenue stream by organisation? 205. Leaked emails from the EMA show they lodged a Major objection with Pfizer, namely that the possibility of translated proteins other than the translated protein resulting from truncated or modified mRNA should be addressed. Were these concerns addressed? The European Medicines Agency’s COVID-19 Vaccine Leaks: Hacks, Regulatory Pressures And Manufacturing Concerns – Health Policy Watch (healthpolicy-watch.news)

96. There is no evidence that the blood lung barrier will allow IgG antibodies which weight around 150,000 Daltons to cross from the blood into the alveolar space of the lungs where Covid is infecting the epithelial cells. Given this is the case why do authorities claim the Covid vaccine can fight Covid which is present in the lungs? 97. I note that the TGA non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine showed there was very little difference in lung inflammation after 8 days in between vaccinated an unvaccinated monkeys. Given they weight 10kgs and got three times the dose of humans on what basis did this trial proof the vaccine was effective noting there was an IgG response for only 35 days. I note the weight to dose ratio for the monkeys was 20 times higher than humans so on that basis there may have been an IgG response for two days (35/20) or a lower IgG response.

135. Given the TGA failed to review the gene technology around the Pfizer vaccine did the TGA seek advice and analysis from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator before approving the Pfizer vaccine which involves gene technology? If not why not? 136. Was the TGA required to get authorisation from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator before approving the Pfizer vaccine? 137. Did the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator provide analysis to the TGA for either of the Astra Zeneca or Pfizer vaccines? If so, could copies please be provided.

45. Why do people have to lodge a FOI to get serious adverse event data from the TGA – shouldn’t it be made available with weekly reports? I refer to FOI-3520 that had to be lodged in order to get the total number of serious adverse events following Covid-19 vaccine injections? 46. Can the TGA point out where on the weekly reports are the total of serious adverse events listed as per John Skerritts comments in estimates that they are listed? There is nowhere that specifically states how many of the total adverse events reported are serious.

115. There are fifty adverse event reports in children under 17 years old for Moderna Spikevax (100 ug of mRNA) and roughly the same amount in the 5 to 11 year old group where an adult dose of 30 ug was given instead of the provisionally authorised 10 ug all since January 10 – Feb 3. That’s roughly 100 children incorrectly given a much stronger dose and unauthorised for their age. What is the TGA doing about the administrators of vaccines giving wrong dosage amounts to children. I note Phase I dose finding studies halted the 30 ug dose in the sentinel group after a safety committee deemed it too unsafe to continue in that dose for that age group? 217. Why did ATAGI approve the Pfizer vaccine for children given it wasn’t powered to detect rare adverse events? 218. How can ATAGI guarantee that there will no long-term adverse events in children if no long-term testing was carried out on the vaccine? 219. How can ATAGI guarantee that there will no long-term adverse events in children if no long-term testing was carried out on the vaccine? 220. There have already been reports of severe adverse events in children aged 5-11 that weren’t detected in the initial children’s trials including strokes, tardive dyskinesia, chest pain, myocarditis and pericarditis. Given the large number and the broad range of adverse events will ATAGI withdraw its recommendation that the vaccine be rolled out to children?

128. Has the TGA assessed the risk of, and presence of micro-RNA sequences comprised within the Pfizer vaccine? 129. Has the TGA assessed the risk of and or presence of Stop Codon read- through arising as a result of the use pseudouridine in the Pfizer miRNA active ingredient? 130. Do the mRNA strands have stop codons embedded in them? If not, how will the cell stop producing spike proteins? 131. Has the TGA tested the quality of the mRNA strands in the vaccine to determine how many are mal-coded or damaged for every given inoculation? 132. Can the TGA guarantee that no other protein is transcribed by the mRNA vaccine other the purported Covid-19 spike protein? If not why not? 133. How many mRNA strands are in one dose of the Pfizer vaccine? 134. How can Pfizer/TGA guarantee that each does of the Pfizer vaccine will have the same number of mRNA strands?

Senator RENNICK: Okay; that’s fine. When you review that data, can you please tell me how many people in the placebo trial were hospitalised, how many in the inoculation trial were hospitalised and how many died in the initial Pfizer trial?Dr Skerritt: Senator, we’ll put the data on deaths in the placebo and active arm as an answer to a question on notice.Senator RENNICK: I know the answer to that now; it’s actually zero and zero, because the initial Pfizer trial had no clinical outcomes in terms of hospitalisations and death and it had no-Dr Skerritt: Senator, I do not believe that is correct.Senator RENNICK: In the initial Pfizer trial, in the six-month data, there are different numbers, but-Dr Skerritt: Senator, I do not believe that you are correct-Senator RENNICK: Okay. We can move on.Dr Skerritt: I’m happy to, on notice. I do not believe that the Pfizer trial for the COVID-19 vaccine lacked data on hospitalisations. I do not believe that your assertion is correct.Senator RENNICK: Okay. I did not say it lacked data; I asked how many went to hospital. I’m asking you how many went to hospital and how many died in the inoculation group and the placebo group.Dr Skerritt: We will provide that information on notice.Senator RENNICK: Could you also provide subclinical outcomes regarding clotting and inflammation.Dr Skerritt: We’ll provide that additional information from the trial data, on notice.Senator RENNICK: Yes, on the initial trial data and not the six-month trial data.Dr Skerritt: Yes, on the initial. As long as-Senator RENNICK: Okay. Thanks, Chair.

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard