Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

178. On average how many strands of mRNA are in 30 micrograms of mRNA? Given there are 5 doses in each vial how can the TGA be sure that each dose will contain the same amount of mRNA? 179. What is the margin of error administering 30 uml (.3mL) from a vial with 5 doses? 180. Why didn’t the TGA make Pfzier measure out the 30 microns evenly instead of leaving it to the person who administers the vaccine – the margin of error for such a small dose would be huge would it not? 181. Given the TGA measures mRNA by mass how does it know if they or the administrators of the vaccine are measuring mRNA and not solution?

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

204. Studies have shown that the weight of the protein produced by the mRNA vary by as much as 50% – surely this is evidence that the mRNA is not being produced in a consistent manner by the ribosomes? Is the TGA tracking the product being produced by the ribosomes? 221. Why is TGA/Pfizer calling it mRNA when it isn’t mRNA – the use of Methylpseudouridine means it’s a different substance does it not? 267. Which part of the mRNA code directs it to be processed on the ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum – could the TGA please state the name of the amino acid and what position the amino acid sits on the mRNA strand? 289. Is pseudouridine impervious to the mRNAse, the enzyme that breaks down mRNA?

105. What was the absolute efficacy (not relative efficacy) in reducing people catching Covid of the Pfizer vaccine in the initial trials conducted by Pfizer? 106. To what extent did the vaccine reduce transmission in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide in terms of absolute numbers? 107. To what extent did the vaccine reduce hospitalisation admissions in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 108. To what extent did the vaccine reduce deaths in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 109. To what extent the vaccine cause inflammation in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result? 110. To what extent did the vaccine cause clotting in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result. 113. On the 4th of January 2021, the CEO of Pfizer said the Pfizer vaccine was 100% effective in stopping transmission. This claim was repeated by Health experts in Australia. Will the TGA and the Health Department provide an apology to the Australian people for misleading them?

98. In the initial Pfizer trials why no testing was done on the carcinogenic properties of the vaccine and why didn’t the TGA request it be performed?99. In the initial Pfizer trials why was no testing was done on pregnant women, breastfeeding women or immunocompromised people and why didn’t the TGA request it be performed?100. In the initial Pfizer trial why was the placebo group was unblinded after 2 months when best practice required the group to stay blinded until the end of the trial 2-3 years later?101. Given the lack of quality assurance and data derived from the Pfizer trials on what basis does John Skerrit say that the data was thoroughly assessed for safety?

29. If John Skerritt and the TGA doesn’t believe the medical experts who suspect the vaccines are the cause of death are wrong, then why won’t the TGA acknowledge the deaths as being from the vaccine? 30. Why does the TGA and its experts who never examined the patient think they have a better understanding of the cause of death than the experts who actually examined the body and/or dealt with the patient symptoms as they were dying? 31. How can a board of remote ”experts” making a subjective assessment without examining the body overrule the physician who did examine the body and ticked the box ”likely” to be an adverse effect or reported death?

151. Why were Early Treatments withheld from the Australian public from even being tried? 152. Why has the health department failed to actively pursue getting effective affordable Early Treatment protocols for Covid, especially given they could reduce viral loads and transmission unlike the Covid vaccines? 153. Was it a legal reason that did not allow the experimental vaccines to be used at all if there was already a treatment that works? 154. Were there any terms and conditions in the Pfizer contract with the Australian government for the Covid vaccines that prevented early treatments from being used? 255. Can the TGA guarantee there have been no lives lost by obstructing the use of early treatments as compared to allowing them?

178. On average how many strands of mRNA are in 30 micrograms of mRNA? Given there are 5 doses in each vial how can the TGA be sure that each dose will contain the same amount of mRNA? 179. What is the margin of error administering 30 uml (.3mL) from a vial with 5 doses? 180. Why didn’t the TGA make Pfzier measure out the 30 microns evenly instead of leaving it to the person who administers the vaccine – the margin of error for such a small dose would be huge would it not? 181. Given the TGA measures mRNA by mass how does it know if they or the administrators of the vaccine are measuring mRNA and not solution?

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

204. Studies have shown that the weight of the protein produced by the mRNA vary by as much as 50% – surely this is evidence that the mRNA is not being produced in a consistent manner by the ribosomes? Is the TGA tracking the product being produced by the ribosomes? 221. Why is TGA/Pfizer calling it mRNA when it isn’t mRNA – the use of Methylpseudouridine means it’s a different substance does it not? 267. Which part of the mRNA code directs it to be processed on the ribosomes bound to the endoplasmic reticulum – could the TGA please state the name of the amino acid and what position the amino acid sits on the mRNA strand? 289. Is pseudouridine impervious to the mRNAse, the enzyme that breaks down mRNA?

105. What was the absolute efficacy (not relative efficacy) in reducing people catching Covid of the Pfizer vaccine in the initial trials conducted by Pfizer? 106. To what extent did the vaccine reduce transmission in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide in terms of absolute numbers? 107. To what extent did the vaccine reduce hospitalisation admissions in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 108. To what extent did the vaccine reduce deaths in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 109. To what extent the vaccine cause inflammation in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result? 110. To what extent did the vaccine cause clotting in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result. 113. On the 4th of January 2021, the CEO of Pfizer said the Pfizer vaccine was 100% effective in stopping transmission. This claim was repeated by Health experts in Australia. Will the TGA and the Health Department provide an apology to the Australian people for misleading them?

98. In the initial Pfizer trials why no testing was done on the carcinogenic properties of the vaccine and why didn’t the TGA request it be performed?99. In the initial Pfizer trials why was no testing was done on pregnant women, breastfeeding women or immunocompromised people and why didn’t the TGA request it be performed?100. In the initial Pfizer trial why was the placebo group was unblinded after 2 months when best practice required the group to stay blinded until the end of the trial 2-3 years later?101. Given the lack of quality assurance and data derived from the Pfizer trials on what basis does John Skerrit say that the data was thoroughly assessed for safety?

29. If John Skerritt and the TGA doesn’t believe the medical experts who suspect the vaccines are the cause of death are wrong, then why won’t the TGA acknowledge the deaths as being from the vaccine? 30. Why does the TGA and its experts who never examined the patient think they have a better understanding of the cause of death than the experts who actually examined the body and/or dealt with the patient symptoms as they were dying? 31. How can a board of remote ”experts” making a subjective assessment without examining the body overrule the physician who did examine the body and ticked the box ”likely” to be an adverse effect or reported death?

151. Why were Early Treatments withheld from the Australian public from even being tried? 152. Why has the health department failed to actively pursue getting effective affordable Early Treatment protocols for Covid, especially given they could reduce viral loads and transmission unlike the Covid vaccines? 153. Was it a legal reason that did not allow the experimental vaccines to be used at all if there was already a treatment that works? 154. Were there any terms and conditions in the Pfizer contract with the Australian government for the Covid vaccines that prevented early treatments from being used? 255. Can the TGA guarantee there have been no lives lost by obstructing the use of early treatments as compared to allowing them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard