Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

Stay up to date...

JOIN MY MAILING LIST

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

43. In the post marketing report on page 6 it says “Pfizer has also taken multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.” Surely if the vaccine was safe and effective Pfizer wouldn’t need to employ an additional 1,800 staff to deal with adverse events? Isn’t this in itself a concerning safety signal?

21/11/2022

45. As per the TGA non-clinical report, there are no data on the kinetics of BNT162b2 mRNA degradation (page 10). There are no distribution and degradation data on the S antigen-encoding mRNA. (Page 4) How can Health Authorities claim the vaccines are safe when no comprehensive testing was carried on the spike protein which has known toxic properties? 46. Studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs. Why is the TGA ignoring this and more importantly continuing to promote the vaccine as safe and effective when the side effects are not understood and there is ample evidence of adverse events? 47. Given studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs, how can the TGA prove long Covid isn’t a result of the vaccine and not the virus? Are long covid tests being carried out to determine if the cause of the injury is from the vaccine or the virus? Are medical biomarkers such as the N protein and Methylpseudouridine being tracked to determine cause of long Covid?

21/11/2022

49. The use of pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines was developed as a very recent concept and its long-term effects are unknown. It has however been known for 10 years that the use of pseudo-U causes the stop codons (required to stop adding amino acids to a protein chain) to misfunction, thereby elongating the protein chain and risking translation of the next segment (the 3’UTR) (Karijolich 2011). The effects of this are unknown and cannot be known without specific experiments to address the issue. When did the TGA become aware that the synthetic nucleotide pseudouridine was being used rather than the natural uridine and what testing did it undertake to ensure that it was safe to use? 50. Studies have shown the psuedouridine has a higher translation error rate than uridine. Wasn’t it reckless to roll out the vaccine knowing that? Improving the fidelity of uridine analog incorporation during in vitro transcription | bioRxiv (available at: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.12.488100v1)

21/11/2022

52. FOI 3471 shows contamination in the batches. Why didn’t the TGA undertake whole genome sequencing on the batches when it was an obvious way to look for contamination? 53. As per the TGA FOI disclosure log that some batches had up to 40% degraded mRNA – what are the potential risks of degraded mRNA in the body and what studies were carried to determine the safety of degraded mRNA? 54. How does the TGA know degraded mRNA isn’t going to produce toxic proteins? 55. How did the TGA undertake batch testing. Are all vials tested and what were the benchmarks especially in regards to tolerance levels? 56. Did the Covid-19 vaccine trail undertaken by Pfizer use batches made via the commercial process or the laboratory process? Are there trials undertaken by Pfizer using the commercial process and if so can they be provided? 57. Can the TGA report batch numbers by number of reported adverse events and reported deaths so people can see which batches had the highest rate of adverse events? 58. Could the TGA please provide evidence that the Covid vaccine batches had the same purity in Australia as what was stated in the manufacturing facility. Could documentation of the signatures and percentage of intact mRNA by both the manufacturer and the TGA please be provided? 59. Why did the TGA approve batches with as low as 60% integrity and how can it guarantee safety of those batches from degraded mRNA and further degradation after transport? 60. Why is the integrity level of batches commercial in confidence? This is a safety issue that Australians should be aware of it is it not? 61. If a batch is only 60% intact and each vial contains 5 doses how can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose? 62. FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 says concentration depends on batch size? How can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose?

21/11/2022

5. I note Professor Skerritt is currently Vice-Chair of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities and Chair of the Scientific Advisory Council of the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science – do these organisations receive money from pharmaceutical companies? If so, then isn’t there a conflict of interest in Professor Skerritt holding these positions? 6. I note that a number of members on the TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines work for organisations that receive significant funding from big pharmaceutical companies. How is this not a conflict of interest?

21/11/2022

8. Has any safety testing been carried out in either humans or animals to determine the side effects of receiving 5 mRNA vaccines? 9. How is it that any deaths with a positive covid test is classed as a Covid death regardless of cause while any death after a vaccine isn’t classed as a vaccine death? Given the vaccine is still only provisionally approved shouldn’t all deaths with 6-8 weeks of receiving a vaccine be treated as a vaccine death until proven otherwise? 10. What are the criteria for a death to be linked to a vaccine? 11. Health advice says the benefits outweigh the risks on having 3 jabs as a 16+ year old person who is otherwise healthy? Where are the trials/numbers that support this statement and how can the TGA/ATAGI say this when longitudinal, carcinogenic, genotoxicity and numerous other tests were not carried out? 12. Severe adverse injuries were only counted by Pfizer in their Covid-19 trial up to 1 month after 2nd jab leading to the number of vaccine injuries being understated. “Limitations of our study include that Pfizer’s SAE table did not include SAEs occurring past 1 month after dose 2. This reporting threshold may have led to an undercounting of serious AE’ in the Pfizer study” – Why does the TGA believe this is acceptable Quality Assurance when Professor Skerritt said on the Today show in early 2021 that serious injuries could occur up to 8 weeks after the vaccine? 13. What is the adverse injury run rate that the TGA considers acceptable for a safe vaccine/drug? What are the benchmarks for proving it was safe? 14. I note that the 6-month data from the Pfizer trials 20 people died in the inoculation group while 15 died in the placebo group. 5,241 had related adverse events in the vaccination group against 1,311 in the placebo group – 300% more, 262 had severe adverse events (interferes significantly with normal function) in the vaccination group v 150 in the placebo group – 75% more and 127 had a serious adverse event (hospitalisation or visit to ER) v 116 in the placebo group which is 10% more – so where exactly does the TGA and other health authorities come up with the statement that the vaccine was actually proven to be safe and effective?

21/11/2022

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

19. I have previously asked why does the TGA override doctors who have lodged adverse event claims of death and the TGA replied – “The premise of the statement by the Senator is wrong. Reporting of an adverse event to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not mean that the reporting doctor considers that it was caused by a vaccine.” This reply is unsatisfactory. If they have ticked the box “suspected” it means they do consider the vaccine contributed to the death – SQ22-000105. To quote one doctor “Doctors and nurses only report suspected drug reactions to the DAEN. We do not have the time to waste reporting a broken leg as an adverse drug reaction. The DAEN report takes about 20-30 minutes and we are very aware, having to put our name to the reports, that the report could be used against us if we were to be found making vexatious, superficial or spurious reports. 20. All drug reactions reported by doctors and nurses are therefore suspected to be linked to the drug, by definition. That is what the DAEN is for. It says it on the front page of the reporting section (see screenshot).’ Why is the TGA downplaying reported deaths from vaccines and in doing so is acting negligently? 37. Studies are now showing negative efficacy with vaccination in regards to hospitalisation and death from 6-20 weeks after the vaccine. What does the TGA have to say about the long term safety and cost benefit analysis of the vaccine? 38. How long does it take to investigate an adverse event report? 39. I note the TGA have around 60 staff looking at adverse events – was this enough given the large number of reported injuries. This would have given staff approximately 30 minutes on average to investigate every injury – how was this enough time to investigate thoroughly?

21/11/2022

22. Of the more than 900 reported Covid vaccine deaths, how many have been subject to causality assessments or autopsies to determine if they were caused by the vaccine? 23. Shouldn’t every suspected death be reported to the coroner for greater analysis rather than rely on a hands-off TGA report for relevance to the vaccine? 24. Can the TGA please provide all paperwork relating to reported deaths from the vaccine. Name can be redacted. Data can be provided via a softcopy. 25. Is the TGA willing to have an audit conducted on the review of deaths by the vaccine – if not, why not? 26. If a reported death occurs within 14 days after receiving a vaccine was this considered a vaccinated or unvaccinated case by the TGA? i.e. are all suspected deaths reported to the TGA regarded as vaccine death regardless of the time between the date of death and date of vaccine? 27. Actual deaths per month jumped dramatically after the rollout of the Covid vaccine in May 2021, yet before Covid was even in the community. This is an extremely strong temporal signal that the vaccine is causing an increase in deaths. Why is the Health Department/TGA discounting the fact that the increase in actual deaths throughout 2021 are not related to the vaccine? 28. When the death rate is broken out by age the increase in deaths is actually over 10% from May 2021 for 75 and older cohorts. -Given the Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested on people older the 75 (in any significant numbers – See Table 1 2389-1) why is the TGA continuing to roll out the jab given real world evidence is suggesting an extremely strong correlation/causation with deaths in older people? 29. Are deaths being tracked by vaccination status? This would indicate whether or not excess deaths are being driven by the vaccinated or unvaccinated, wouldn’t it 30. Is the time between death and time from vaccination status being recorded – if not why not – this is still a provisional vaccine? If so, can the TGA please provide an excel spreadsheet of deidentified data showing date of vaccination and date of death for deaths in Australia since the rollout of the vaccine began? 31. How many reported deaths died within 2, days, 14 days, 30 days and 60 days of taking the vaccine? 32. Are only fully paid TGA staff assessing vaccine deaths or has this been outsourced to other agencies? If so, do these agencies have conflicts of interest? 33. Please provide the methodology used by the TGA that justifies discrediting (99%) of the reports made by health professionals on behalf of their dead patients that the cause of death resulted from the vaccines? 36. Does the TGA or State or Territory health departments require autopsies to be performed on persons dying at any time post COVID-19 vaccination? If not, why not? 40. Why does the TGA believe that the deaths reported to the DEAN are false and misleading (AFN factcheck 03/09/2022) – these reports are ticked as suspected and over 70% come from health professionals – what right does the TGA have to dismiss them?

21/11/2022

My question below refers to the figures contained within the report released on 15/02/2022 – https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/covid-19-mortality-australia . Of the 2639 people that have died with or from Covid-19 by 31st of Jan 2022, why have the ABS stated that 2,556 (approximately 97%) have been directly caused by Covid? Is this not a misleading statement given that in the same report it is stated that 91.4% of the deaths in Australia had another condition listed on the death certificate, with an average of 2.7 other conditions being listed including cancer (14.1%) and chronic cardiac conditions (35.8%).

22/02/2022

1. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the mandating of vaccines by employers which goes against the explicit statement in the immunisation handbook that people cannot be coerced into an taking a vaccine? 2. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the dismissal of employees unable to get a second inoculation because they were injured by the first inoculation and received a medical exemption? 3. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the dismissal of employees who because of prior anaphylactic reactions don’t want to take the vaccine? 4. If an employee is injured by vaccine forced upon them by a mandate can the employee sue the employer for damages? If not, why not? 5. Why does Fair Work Australia believe that employers are responsible for the transmission of an airborne virus? If it doesn’t think, that then why not legislate accordingly so that businesses (excluding hospitals and aged care centres) are not responsible for public health measures? 6. How are employers meant to trace the transmission of the virus to either their employees or customers? If it isn’t possible then why is Fair Work Australia allowing State Governments to impose rules that are impossible to apply or substantiate? 7. Is it fair and reasonable for an employee to be forced into taking a vaccine if the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission and doesn’t prevent hospitalisation and sickness? 8. If an employee is injured by the vaccine mandated by their employer can the employee claim compensation under Workcover? 9. I note that employers have been telling employees that they are not liable for vaccine injuries because the commonwealth government has indemnified them. Is this true?

22/02/2022

12. If there is a state of emergency why are large sporting events such as the cricket allowed to take with large crowds in attendance? 13. On what grounds did the health minister again rollover the state of emergency given sporting events are allowed to take place and state governments are continually overestimating the true impact of Covid? 14. How much longer with the state of emergency go for? 15. What is the criteria around which the health minister determines a state of emergency is necessary?

22/02/2022

43. In the post marketing report on page 6 it says “Pfizer has also taken multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.” Surely if the vaccine was safe and effective Pfizer wouldn’t need to employ an additional 1,800 staff to deal with adverse events? Isn’t this in itself a concerning safety signal?

21/11/2022

45. As per the TGA non-clinical report, there are no data on the kinetics of BNT162b2 mRNA degradation (page 10). There are no distribution and degradation data on the S antigen-encoding mRNA. (Page 4) How can Health Authorities claim the vaccines are safe when no comprehensive testing was carried on the spike protein which has known toxic properties? 46. Studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs. Why is the TGA ignoring this and more importantly continuing to promote the vaccine as safe and effective when the side effects are not understood and there is ample evidence of adverse events? 47. Given studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs, how can the TGA prove long Covid isn’t a result of the vaccine and not the virus? Are long covid tests being carried out to determine if the cause of the injury is from the vaccine or the virus? Are medical biomarkers such as the N protein and Methylpseudouridine being tracked to determine cause of long Covid?

21/11/2022

49. The use of pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines was developed as a very recent concept and its long-term effects are unknown. It has however been known for 10 years that the use of pseudo-U causes the stop codons (required to stop adding amino acids to a protein chain) to misfunction, thereby elongating the protein chain and risking translation of the next segment (the 3’UTR) (Karijolich 2011). The effects of this are unknown and cannot be known without specific experiments to address the issue. When did the TGA become aware that the synthetic nucleotide pseudouridine was being used rather than the natural uridine and what testing did it undertake to ensure that it was safe to use? 50. Studies have shown the psuedouridine has a higher translation error rate than uridine. Wasn’t it reckless to roll out the vaccine knowing that? Improving the fidelity of uridine analog incorporation during in vitro transcription | bioRxiv (available at: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.12.488100v1)

21/11/2022

52. FOI 3471 shows contamination in the batches. Why didn’t the TGA undertake whole genome sequencing on the batches when it was an obvious way to look for contamination? 53. As per the TGA FOI disclosure log that some batches had up to 40% degraded mRNA – what are the potential risks of degraded mRNA in the body and what studies were carried to determine the safety of degraded mRNA? 54. How does the TGA know degraded mRNA isn’t going to produce toxic proteins? 55. How did the TGA undertake batch testing. Are all vials tested and what were the benchmarks especially in regards to tolerance levels? 56. Did the Covid-19 vaccine trail undertaken by Pfizer use batches made via the commercial process or the laboratory process? Are there trials undertaken by Pfizer using the commercial process and if so can they be provided? 57. Can the TGA report batch numbers by number of reported adverse events and reported deaths so people can see which batches had the highest rate of adverse events? 58. Could the TGA please provide evidence that the Covid vaccine batches had the same purity in Australia as what was stated in the manufacturing facility. Could documentation of the signatures and percentage of intact mRNA by both the manufacturer and the TGA please be provided? 59. Why did the TGA approve batches with as low as 60% integrity and how can it guarantee safety of those batches from degraded mRNA and further degradation after transport? 60. Why is the integrity level of batches commercial in confidence? This is a safety issue that Australians should be aware of it is it not? 61. If a batch is only 60% intact and each vial contains 5 doses how can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose? 62. FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 says concentration depends on batch size? How can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose?

21/11/2022

5. I note Professor Skerritt is currently Vice-Chair of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities and Chair of the Scientific Advisory Council of the Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science – do these organisations receive money from pharmaceutical companies? If so, then isn’t there a conflict of interest in Professor Skerritt holding these positions? 6. I note that a number of members on the TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines work for organisations that receive significant funding from big pharmaceutical companies. How is this not a conflict of interest?

21/11/2022

8. Has any safety testing been carried out in either humans or animals to determine the side effects of receiving 5 mRNA vaccines? 9. How is it that any deaths with a positive covid test is classed as a Covid death regardless of cause while any death after a vaccine isn’t classed as a vaccine death? Given the vaccine is still only provisionally approved shouldn’t all deaths with 6-8 weeks of receiving a vaccine be treated as a vaccine death until proven otherwise? 10. What are the criteria for a death to be linked to a vaccine? 11. Health advice says the benefits outweigh the risks on having 3 jabs as a 16+ year old person who is otherwise healthy? Where are the trials/numbers that support this statement and how can the TGA/ATAGI say this when longitudinal, carcinogenic, genotoxicity and numerous other tests were not carried out? 12. Severe adverse injuries were only counted by Pfizer in their Covid-19 trial up to 1 month after 2nd jab leading to the number of vaccine injuries being understated. “Limitations of our study include that Pfizer’s SAE table did not include SAEs occurring past 1 month after dose 2. This reporting threshold may have led to an undercounting of serious AE’ in the Pfizer study” – Why does the TGA believe this is acceptable Quality Assurance when Professor Skerritt said on the Today show in early 2021 that serious injuries could occur up to 8 weeks after the vaccine? 13. What is the adverse injury run rate that the TGA considers acceptable for a safe vaccine/drug? What are the benchmarks for proving it was safe? 14. I note that the 6-month data from the Pfizer trials 20 people died in the inoculation group while 15 died in the placebo group. 5,241 had related adverse events in the vaccination group against 1,311 in the placebo group – 300% more, 262 had severe adverse events (interferes significantly with normal function) in the vaccination group v 150 in the placebo group – 75% more and 127 had a serious adverse event (hospitalisation or visit to ER) v 116 in the placebo group which is 10% more – so where exactly does the TGA and other health authorities come up with the statement that the vaccine was actually proven to be safe and effective?

21/11/2022

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

19. I have previously asked why does the TGA override doctors who have lodged adverse event claims of death and the TGA replied – “The premise of the statement by the Senator is wrong. Reporting of an adverse event to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not mean that the reporting doctor considers that it was caused by a vaccine.” This reply is unsatisfactory. If they have ticked the box “suspected” it means they do consider the vaccine contributed to the death – SQ22-000105. To quote one doctor “Doctors and nurses only report suspected drug reactions to the DAEN. We do not have the time to waste reporting a broken leg as an adverse drug reaction. The DAEN report takes about 20-30 minutes and we are very aware, having to put our name to the reports, that the report could be used against us if we were to be found making vexatious, superficial or spurious reports. 20. All drug reactions reported by doctors and nurses are therefore suspected to be linked to the drug, by definition. That is what the DAEN is for. It says it on the front page of the reporting section (see screenshot).’ Why is the TGA downplaying reported deaths from vaccines and in doing so is acting negligently? 37. Studies are now showing negative efficacy with vaccination in regards to hospitalisation and death from 6-20 weeks after the vaccine. What does the TGA have to say about the long term safety and cost benefit analysis of the vaccine? 38. How long does it take to investigate an adverse event report? 39. I note the TGA have around 60 staff looking at adverse events – was this enough given the large number of reported injuries. This would have given staff approximately 30 minutes on average to investigate every injury – how was this enough time to investigate thoroughly?

21/11/2022

22. Of the more than 900 reported Covid vaccine deaths, how many have been subject to causality assessments or autopsies to determine if they were caused by the vaccine? 23. Shouldn’t every suspected death be reported to the coroner for greater analysis rather than rely on a hands-off TGA report for relevance to the vaccine? 24. Can the TGA please provide all paperwork relating to reported deaths from the vaccine. Name can be redacted. Data can be provided via a softcopy. 25. Is the TGA willing to have an audit conducted on the review of deaths by the vaccine – if not, why not? 26. If a reported death occurs within 14 days after receiving a vaccine was this considered a vaccinated or unvaccinated case by the TGA? i.e. are all suspected deaths reported to the TGA regarded as vaccine death regardless of the time between the date of death and date of vaccine? 27. Actual deaths per month jumped dramatically after the rollout of the Covid vaccine in May 2021, yet before Covid was even in the community. This is an extremely strong temporal signal that the vaccine is causing an increase in deaths. Why is the Health Department/TGA discounting the fact that the increase in actual deaths throughout 2021 are not related to the vaccine? 28. When the death rate is broken out by age the increase in deaths is actually over 10% from May 2021 for 75 and older cohorts. -Given the Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested on people older the 75 (in any significant numbers – See Table 1 2389-1) why is the TGA continuing to roll out the jab given real world evidence is suggesting an extremely strong correlation/causation with deaths in older people? 29. Are deaths being tracked by vaccination status? This would indicate whether or not excess deaths are being driven by the vaccinated or unvaccinated, wouldn’t it 30. Is the time between death and time from vaccination status being recorded – if not why not – this is still a provisional vaccine? If so, can the TGA please provide an excel spreadsheet of deidentified data showing date of vaccination and date of death for deaths in Australia since the rollout of the vaccine began? 31. How many reported deaths died within 2, days, 14 days, 30 days and 60 days of taking the vaccine? 32. Are only fully paid TGA staff assessing vaccine deaths or has this been outsourced to other agencies? If so, do these agencies have conflicts of interest? 33. Please provide the methodology used by the TGA that justifies discrediting (99%) of the reports made by health professionals on behalf of their dead patients that the cause of death resulted from the vaccines? 36. Does the TGA or State or Territory health departments require autopsies to be performed on persons dying at any time post COVID-19 vaccination? If not, why not? 40. Why does the TGA believe that the deaths reported to the DEAN are false and misleading (AFN factcheck 03/09/2022) – these reports are ticked as suspected and over 70% come from health professionals – what right does the TGA have to dismiss them?

21/11/2022

My question below refers to the figures contained within the report released on 15/02/2022 – https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/covid-19-mortality-australia . Of the 2639 people that have died with or from Covid-19 by 31st of Jan 2022, why have the ABS stated that 2,556 (approximately 97%) have been directly caused by Covid? Is this not a misleading statement given that in the same report it is stated that 91.4% of the deaths in Australia had another condition listed on the death certificate, with an average of 2.7 other conditions being listed including cancer (14.1%) and chronic cardiac conditions (35.8%).

22/02/2022

1. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the mandating of vaccines by employers which goes against the explicit statement in the immunisation handbook that people cannot be coerced into an taking a vaccine? 2. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the dismissal of employees unable to get a second inoculation because they were injured by the first inoculation and received a medical exemption? 3. How can Fair Work Australia morally justify the dismissal of employees who because of prior anaphylactic reactions don’t want to take the vaccine? 4. If an employee is injured by vaccine forced upon them by a mandate can the employee sue the employer for damages? If not, why not? 5. Why does Fair Work Australia believe that employers are responsible for the transmission of an airborne virus? If it doesn’t think, that then why not legislate accordingly so that businesses (excluding hospitals and aged care centres) are not responsible for public health measures? 6. How are employers meant to trace the transmission of the virus to either their employees or customers? If it isn’t possible then why is Fair Work Australia allowing State Governments to impose rules that are impossible to apply or substantiate? 7. Is it fair and reasonable for an employee to be forced into taking a vaccine if the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission and doesn’t prevent hospitalisation and sickness? 8. If an employee is injured by the vaccine mandated by their employer can the employee claim compensation under Workcover? 9. I note that employers have been telling employees that they are not liable for vaccine injuries because the commonwealth government has indemnified them. Is this true?

22/02/2022

12. If there is a state of emergency why are large sporting events such as the cricket allowed to take with large crowds in attendance? 13. On what grounds did the health minister again rollover the state of emergency given sporting events are allowed to take place and state governments are continually overestimating the true impact of Covid? 14. How much longer with the state of emergency go for? 15. What is the criteria around which the health minister determines a state of emergency is necessary?

22/02/2022

HAVE YOUR SAY...

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

DON'T BE SILENT. HAVE YOUR SAY!

I’m working on a range of issues currently in the Senate however I need your support so that my other Parliamentary colleagues know that these are issues that you feel strongly about.
Remember that we are stronger in numbers!

Visit People First Party
Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

GET MY Newsletter

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard

COMPLETE MY 30 SECOND SURVEY