Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

Stay up to date...

JOIN MY MAILING LIST

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

19. I have previously asked why does the TGA override doctors who have lodged adverse event claims of death and the TGA replied – “The premise of the statement by the Senator is wrong. Reporting of an adverse event to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not mean that the reporting doctor considers that it was caused by a vaccine.” This reply is unsatisfactory. If they have ticked the box “suspected” it means they do consider the vaccine contributed to the death – SQ22-000105. To quote one doctor “Doctors and nurses only report suspected drug reactions to the DAEN. We do not have the time to waste reporting a broken leg as an adverse drug reaction. The DAEN report takes about 20-30 minutes and we are very aware, having to put our name to the reports, that the report could be used against us if we were to be found making vexatious, superficial or spurious reports. 20. All drug reactions reported by doctors and nurses are therefore suspected to be linked to the drug, by definition. That is what the DAEN is for. It says it on the front page of the reporting section (see screenshot).’ Why is the TGA downplaying reported deaths from vaccines and in doing so is acting negligently? 37. Studies are now showing negative efficacy with vaccination in regards to hospitalisation and death from 6-20 weeks after the vaccine. What does the TGA have to say about the long term safety and cost benefit analysis of the vaccine? 38. How long does it take to investigate an adverse event report? 39. I note the TGA have around 60 staff looking at adverse events – was this enough given the large number of reported injuries. This would have given staff approximately 30 minutes on average to investigate every injury – how was this enough time to investigate thoroughly?

21/11/2022

22. Of the more than 900 reported Covid vaccine deaths, how many have been subject to causality assessments or autopsies to determine if they were caused by the vaccine? 23. Shouldn’t every suspected death be reported to the coroner for greater analysis rather than rely on a hands-off TGA report for relevance to the vaccine? 24. Can the TGA please provide all paperwork relating to reported deaths from the vaccine. Name can be redacted. Data can be provided via a softcopy. 25. Is the TGA willing to have an audit conducted on the review of deaths by the vaccine – if not, why not? 26. If a reported death occurs within 14 days after receiving a vaccine was this considered a vaccinated or unvaccinated case by the TGA? i.e. are all suspected deaths reported to the TGA regarded as vaccine death regardless of the time between the date of death and date of vaccine? 27. Actual deaths per month jumped dramatically after the rollout of the Covid vaccine in May 2021, yet before Covid was even in the community. This is an extremely strong temporal signal that the vaccine is causing an increase in deaths. Why is the Health Department/TGA discounting the fact that the increase in actual deaths throughout 2021 are not related to the vaccine? 28. When the death rate is broken out by age the increase in deaths is actually over 10% from May 2021 for 75 and older cohorts. -Given the Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested on people older the 75 (in any significant numbers – See Table 1 2389-1) why is the TGA continuing to roll out the jab given real world evidence is suggesting an extremely strong correlation/causation with deaths in older people? 29. Are deaths being tracked by vaccination status? This would indicate whether or not excess deaths are being driven by the vaccinated or unvaccinated, wouldn’t it 30. Is the time between death and time from vaccination status being recorded – if not why not – this is still a provisional vaccine? If so, can the TGA please provide an excel spreadsheet of deidentified data showing date of vaccination and date of death for deaths in Australia since the rollout of the vaccine began? 31. How many reported deaths died within 2, days, 14 days, 30 days and 60 days of taking the vaccine? 32. Are only fully paid TGA staff assessing vaccine deaths or has this been outsourced to other agencies? If so, do these agencies have conflicts of interest? 33. Please provide the methodology used by the TGA that justifies discrediting (99%) of the reports made by health professionals on behalf of their dead patients that the cause of death resulted from the vaccines? 36. Does the TGA or State or Territory health departments require autopsies to be performed on persons dying at any time post COVID-19 vaccination? If not, why not? 40. Why does the TGA believe that the deaths reported to the DEAN are false and misleading (AFN factcheck 03/09/2022) – these reports are ticked as suspected and over 70% come from health professionals – what right does the TGA have to dismiss them?

21/11/2022

2. Mr Fletcher said only 28 doctors were suspended for presumably Covid vaccine related matters. Are these current suspensions, or all the suspensions since the rollout began? 3. What were the reasons for the suspensions? 5. Why are complaints about health professionals able to remain anonymous? How can health professionals defend themselves when they don’t know who is complaining about them? 6. Why can AHPRA suspend health professionals based on hearsay complaints that can also remain anonymous? Why isn’t the weight of evidence higher? 7. What checks and balances do AHPRA have in place to ensure that complaints about health professionals are not vexatious? 8. Does AHPRA receive complaints from pharmaceutical companies about health professionals? If so, what are they about? 9. Can AHPRA provide all correspondence between Pfizer and AHPRA regarding their Covid-19 vaccine regarding any complaints they may have lodged?

21/11/2022

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

21/11/2022

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

21/11/2022

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

19. I have previously asked why does the TGA override doctors who have lodged adverse event claims of death and the TGA replied – “The premise of the statement by the Senator is wrong. Reporting of an adverse event to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not mean that the reporting doctor considers that it was caused by a vaccine.” This reply is unsatisfactory. If they have ticked the box “suspected” it means they do consider the vaccine contributed to the death – SQ22-000105. To quote one doctor “Doctors and nurses only report suspected drug reactions to the DAEN. We do not have the time to waste reporting a broken leg as an adverse drug reaction. The DAEN report takes about 20-30 minutes and we are very aware, having to put our name to the reports, that the report could be used against us if we were to be found making vexatious, superficial or spurious reports. 20. All drug reactions reported by doctors and nurses are therefore suspected to be linked to the drug, by definition. That is what the DAEN is for. It says it on the front page of the reporting section (see screenshot).’ Why is the TGA downplaying reported deaths from vaccines and in doing so is acting negligently? 37. Studies are now showing negative efficacy with vaccination in regards to hospitalisation and death from 6-20 weeks after the vaccine. What does the TGA have to say about the long term safety and cost benefit analysis of the vaccine? 38. How long does it take to investigate an adverse event report? 39. I note the TGA have around 60 staff looking at adverse events – was this enough given the large number of reported injuries. This would have given staff approximately 30 minutes on average to investigate every injury – how was this enough time to investigate thoroughly?

21/11/2022

22. Of the more than 900 reported Covid vaccine deaths, how many have been subject to causality assessments or autopsies to determine if they were caused by the vaccine? 23. Shouldn’t every suspected death be reported to the coroner for greater analysis rather than rely on a hands-off TGA report for relevance to the vaccine? 24. Can the TGA please provide all paperwork relating to reported deaths from the vaccine. Name can be redacted. Data can be provided via a softcopy. 25. Is the TGA willing to have an audit conducted on the review of deaths by the vaccine – if not, why not? 26. If a reported death occurs within 14 days after receiving a vaccine was this considered a vaccinated or unvaccinated case by the TGA? i.e. are all suspected deaths reported to the TGA regarded as vaccine death regardless of the time between the date of death and date of vaccine? 27. Actual deaths per month jumped dramatically after the rollout of the Covid vaccine in May 2021, yet before Covid was even in the community. This is an extremely strong temporal signal that the vaccine is causing an increase in deaths. Why is the Health Department/TGA discounting the fact that the increase in actual deaths throughout 2021 are not related to the vaccine? 28. When the death rate is broken out by age the increase in deaths is actually over 10% from May 2021 for 75 and older cohorts. -Given the Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested on people older the 75 (in any significant numbers – See Table 1 2389-1) why is the TGA continuing to roll out the jab given real world evidence is suggesting an extremely strong correlation/causation with deaths in older people? 29. Are deaths being tracked by vaccination status? This would indicate whether or not excess deaths are being driven by the vaccinated or unvaccinated, wouldn’t it 30. Is the time between death and time from vaccination status being recorded – if not why not – this is still a provisional vaccine? If so, can the TGA please provide an excel spreadsheet of deidentified data showing date of vaccination and date of death for deaths in Australia since the rollout of the vaccine began? 31. How many reported deaths died within 2, days, 14 days, 30 days and 60 days of taking the vaccine? 32. Are only fully paid TGA staff assessing vaccine deaths or has this been outsourced to other agencies? If so, do these agencies have conflicts of interest? 33. Please provide the methodology used by the TGA that justifies discrediting (99%) of the reports made by health professionals on behalf of their dead patients that the cause of death resulted from the vaccines? 36. Does the TGA or State or Territory health departments require autopsies to be performed on persons dying at any time post COVID-19 vaccination? If not, why not? 40. Why does the TGA believe that the deaths reported to the DEAN are false and misleading (AFN factcheck 03/09/2022) – these reports are ticked as suspected and over 70% come from health professionals – what right does the TGA have to dismiss them?

21/11/2022

2. Mr Fletcher said only 28 doctors were suspended for presumably Covid vaccine related matters. Are these current suspensions, or all the suspensions since the rollout began? 3. What were the reasons for the suspensions? 5. Why are complaints about health professionals able to remain anonymous? How can health professionals defend themselves when they don’t know who is complaining about them? 6. Why can AHPRA suspend health professionals based on hearsay complaints that can also remain anonymous? Why isn’t the weight of evidence higher? 7. What checks and balances do AHPRA have in place to ensure that complaints about health professionals are not vexatious? 8. Does AHPRA receive complaints from pharmaceutical companies about health professionals? If so, what are they about? 9. Can AHPRA provide all correspondence between Pfizer and AHPRA regarding their Covid-19 vaccine regarding any complaints they may have lodged?

21/11/2022

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

21/11/2022

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

21/11/2022

HAVE YOUR SAY...

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

DON'T BE SILENT. HAVE YOUR SAY!

I’m working on a range of issues currently in the Senate however I need your support so that my other Parliamentary colleagues know that these are issues that you feel strongly about.
Remember that we are stronger in numbers!

Visit People First Party
Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

GET MY Newsletter

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard

COMPLETE MY 30 SECOND SURVEY