Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

2. Mr Fletcher said only 28 doctors were suspended for presumably Covid vaccine related matters. Are these current suspensions, or all the suspensions since the rollout began? 3. What were the reasons for the suspensions? 5. Why are complaints about health professionals able to remain anonymous? How can health professionals defend themselves when they don’t know who is complaining about them? 6. Why can AHPRA suspend health professionals based on hearsay complaints that can also remain anonymous? Why isn’t the weight of evidence higher? 7. What checks and balances do AHPRA have in place to ensure that complaints about health professionals are not vexatious? 8. Does AHPRA receive complaints from pharmaceutical companies about health professionals? If so, what are they about? 9. Can AHPRA provide all correspondence between Pfizer and AHPRA regarding their Covid-19 vaccine regarding any complaints they may have lodged?

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

If a Commonwealth employee is (i) coerced into having a flu vaccine and their job does not require it; (ii) that vaccine results in a permanent neurological injury, for example, multiple sclerosis; (iii) the Commonwealth employee is independently assessed as having that neurological injury being triggered by the vaccine, and; (iv) Comcare accepts the employee’s claim, Will Comcare pay for all ongoing physical treatments* prescribed by a GP & neurologist, for the rest of that employee’s life, (a) if those physical treatments only serve to maintain (but not improve) that employee’s health? (b) if those physical treatments only serve to slow down that employee’s decline in health? By ‘physical treatments’ I am referring to * exercise physiology by a physiotherapist 3 times a week to ensure appropriately tailored exercises and to keep neural pathways open. Appropriate tailoring of exercises is also necessary to prevent the employee from suffering a further injury that would be foreseeable if they were left to their own devices to make up their own program; * remedial massage 1-2 times a week; * gym membership, and; * any other medically prescribed treatments

(a) Does Comcare ‘audit’ workplaces such as Parliament House, to ensure the Department of Parliamentary Services has appropriate disability accommodation strategies in place, where an employee has a disability or workplace injury such as multiple sclerosis? (b) If yes, then what criteria does Comcare use to undertake such an audit and satisfy itself that disability is appropriately accommodated? (c) Does Comcare ever conduct a survey of those with such a disability at Parliament House to inform its findings in relation to such an ‘audit’?

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

2. Mr Fletcher said only 28 doctors were suspended for presumably Covid vaccine related matters. Are these current suspensions, or all the suspensions since the rollout began? 3. What were the reasons for the suspensions? 5. Why are complaints about health professionals able to remain anonymous? How can health professionals defend themselves when they don’t know who is complaining about them? 6. Why can AHPRA suspend health professionals based on hearsay complaints that can also remain anonymous? Why isn’t the weight of evidence higher? 7. What checks and balances do AHPRA have in place to ensure that complaints about health professionals are not vexatious? 8. Does AHPRA receive complaints from pharmaceutical companies about health professionals? If so, what are they about? 9. Can AHPRA provide all correspondence between Pfizer and AHPRA regarding their Covid-19 vaccine regarding any complaints they may have lodged?

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

If a Commonwealth employee is (i) coerced into having a flu vaccine and their job does not require it; (ii) that vaccine results in a permanent neurological injury, for example, multiple sclerosis; (iii) the Commonwealth employee is independently assessed as having that neurological injury being triggered by the vaccine, and; (iv) Comcare accepts the employee’s claim, Will Comcare pay for all ongoing physical treatments* prescribed by a GP & neurologist, for the rest of that employee’s life, (a) if those physical treatments only serve to maintain (but not improve) that employee’s health? (b) if those physical treatments only serve to slow down that employee’s decline in health? By ‘physical treatments’ I am referring to * exercise physiology by a physiotherapist 3 times a week to ensure appropriately tailored exercises and to keep neural pathways open. Appropriate tailoring of exercises is also necessary to prevent the employee from suffering a further injury that would be foreseeable if they were left to their own devices to make up their own program; * remedial massage 1-2 times a week; * gym membership, and; * any other medically prescribed treatments

(a) Does Comcare ‘audit’ workplaces such as Parliament House, to ensure the Department of Parliamentary Services has appropriate disability accommodation strategies in place, where an employee has a disability or workplace injury such as multiple sclerosis? (b) If yes, then what criteria does Comcare use to undertake such an audit and satisfy itself that disability is appropriately accommodated? (c) Does Comcare ever conduct a survey of those with such a disability at Parliament House to inform its findings in relation to such an ‘audit’?

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard