Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

If Lyndall Dean can be prevented from hearing vaccine cases, then why are other commissioners allowed to hear vaccine cases who have prejudicial and uninformed views about the risks of the Covid19 vaccine? In Jovan Jovcic and Filip Markovic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2022] FWC 1931 Deputy President Coleman states in paragraph 39 that ATAGI status as an expert body that provides advice to the government and public cannot be seriously doubted. What sort of a joke is this? (a) What is the point of an independent commission if they just assume the government and its advisors are infallible? (b) Deputy President Coleman then goes on to state in paragraph 40 that ATAGI said that vaccination was an intervention to prevent transmission. This statement from ATAGI and therefore Deputy President Coleman is unequivocally wrong. There was never any testing by Pfizer that showed the vaccine stopped transmission. This was admitted by Pfizer in the European Parliament in October as well as the FDA as far back as December 2020. The FDA and Pfizer have both said it is unclear how long the vaccine provides protection. Given Deputy President’s Coleman misstated facts what will Fair Work do to rectify this? This error of judgement is further compounded by the fact many of the ATAGI experts work for organisations who are funded by big pharmaceutical companies. They clearly have a conflict of interest that can impair their judgement.

Why should the Australian public trust either Professor Murphy, Professor Skerritt or Professor Kelly given they have all made statements that turned out to be grossly misleading? This includes Professor Kelly claiming the vaccines stopped transmission, Professor Murphy claiming there are no spike proteins in the blood and Professor Skerritt claiming the lipids used in the vaccine were like lipids in a steak one eats for breakfast, when in fact there are four lipids used in the vaccine some of which are cationic? Given these claims have been made in estimate hearings why aren’t they held in contempt?

A number of private organisations in the media, medical professionals, and Pfizer have claimed the Pfizer covid vaccine was safe and effective without outlining the risks or lack of quality assurance in regard to testing the vaccine. Genotoxicity, carcinogenic, and longitudinal testing are just some of the tests that didn’t occur. Other risks with missing information are outlined in the table below. There were only around 19,000 from the vaccinated group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? • What laws are in place to ensure that all risks are outlined as well as the rewards when medical products are advertised or promoted – if laws do exist why weren’t the upheld in the case the Covid-19 vaccine? • What recourse do victims of the Covid-19 vaccine have against private organisations such as the media, pharmaceutical companies, and health professionals who constantly repeated the vaccine is safe and effective without highlighting the risks? • What steps will The Australian Communications and Media Authority take in regard to the promotion of medical products in order to prevent misleading and deceptive conduct in the future? (See table)

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

If Lyndall Dean can be prevented from hearing vaccine cases, then why are other commissioners allowed to hear vaccine cases who have prejudicial and uninformed views about the risks of the Covid19 vaccine? In Jovan Jovcic and Filip Markovic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2022] FWC 1931 Deputy President Coleman states in paragraph 39 that ATAGI status as an expert body that provides advice to the government and public cannot be seriously doubted. What sort of a joke is this? (a) What is the point of an independent commission if they just assume the government and its advisors are infallible? (b) Deputy President Coleman then goes on to state in paragraph 40 that ATAGI said that vaccination was an intervention to prevent transmission. This statement from ATAGI and therefore Deputy President Coleman is unequivocally wrong. There was never any testing by Pfizer that showed the vaccine stopped transmission. This was admitted by Pfizer in the European Parliament in October as well as the FDA as far back as December 2020. The FDA and Pfizer have both said it is unclear how long the vaccine provides protection. Given Deputy President’s Coleman misstated facts what will Fair Work do to rectify this? This error of judgement is further compounded by the fact many of the ATAGI experts work for organisations who are funded by big pharmaceutical companies. They clearly have a conflict of interest that can impair their judgement.

Why should the Australian public trust either Professor Murphy, Professor Skerritt or Professor Kelly given they have all made statements that turned out to be grossly misleading? This includes Professor Kelly claiming the vaccines stopped transmission, Professor Murphy claiming there are no spike proteins in the blood and Professor Skerritt claiming the lipids used in the vaccine were like lipids in a steak one eats for breakfast, when in fact there are four lipids used in the vaccine some of which are cationic? Given these claims have been made in estimate hearings why aren’t they held in contempt?

A number of private organisations in the media, medical professionals, and Pfizer have claimed the Pfizer covid vaccine was safe and effective without outlining the risks or lack of quality assurance in regard to testing the vaccine. Genotoxicity, carcinogenic, and longitudinal testing are just some of the tests that didn’t occur. Other risks with missing information are outlined in the table below. There were only around 19,000 from the vaccinated group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? • What laws are in place to ensure that all risks are outlined as well as the rewards when medical products are advertised or promoted – if laws do exist why weren’t the upheld in the case the Covid-19 vaccine? • What recourse do victims of the Covid-19 vaccine have against private organisations such as the media, pharmaceutical companies, and health professionals who constantly repeated the vaccine is safe and effective without highlighting the risks? • What steps will The Australian Communications and Media Authority take in regard to the promotion of medical products in order to prevent misleading and deceptive conduct in the future? (See table)

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard