Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

119. Has the Federal government covered half the hospital costs for people in hospital with Covid? Was this money reimbursed to State governments? If so, doesn’t this create an incentive for State government to fudge Covid cases in hospital in order to milk the Federal government of Funding? 120. Does the Federal government reimbursing states such as NSW for back capturing whereby that State government counts people as having Covid, even if they had it 28 days prior to entering hospital and went to hospital for another reason such as a broken arm?

146. Why doesn’t the TGA have mandatory reporting requirements of Health professionals for reporting adverse events? Shouldn’t it be mandatory given that the vaccines have only received provisional approval and data from ongoing trials are being assessed on an outgoing basis? 148. In the Post marketing surveillance data there is over 1,000 adverse events of interest – what exactly are adverse events of interest – are they reported adverse events? 149. If the current vaccines fall outside many of the international guidelines for testing vaccines, then isn’t it fair to say they aren’t vaccines. 150. In the post marketing surveillance data – what was the total population of the administered doses? I note this figure has been censored by Pfizer and the FDA – why is such an important indicator of safety being covered up and why won’t the TGA ask for that number and then disclose it? 151. Why did the TGA change death description to Adverse Event following immunisation to avoid scrutiny over cause of death regarding a number of young children were reported to have died from the vaccine?

185. Studies have shown that neutrophils interact with spike proteins to create fibrils that lead to amyloids clots. Has the TGA examined this risk, and can they guarantee that amyloid clots aren’t being formed by the vaccine? 190. I note that the Europeans Medicine Agency has added heavy menstrual bleeding as a side effect of Pfizer and Moderna Covid jabs. Given this delayed warning what testing will the TGA do to ensure that the heavy bleeding isn’t the result of clots and that women are not at danger of having their fertility damaged?

169. In FOI 2389-3 4.3.3 it says “RNA itself, and the lipids used in the BNT162 vaccines have no carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Furthermore, according to ICH SIA, no carcinogenicity studies are required for therapeutics that are not continuously administered. Therefore, no carcinogenicity studies were performed.’ Why is carcinogenicity not tested if boosters are being continually rolled out? 170. In FOI 2389-3 5.3.1.7 regarding coagulation it says “Increases in fibrinogen levels were detected in all vaccinated animals at the end of dosing phase and were consistent with an acute phase response secondary to immune activation and inflammation at the injection sites.” Given clotting was a recognised side effect of the vaccine on what basis can the TGA rule out strokes and other clotting related events? 249. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – page 109 FOI 2389-3 – how is this different to the Covid spike protein mRNA cap? 250. FOI 2389-3 page 20 – some LNPs can be twice as big as others 60-120 nano metres Does this mean that some vaccine lipids can be twice as toxic or efficacious, or some people will get twice the dose of others? 251. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine as per FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 – Theorical length is from 1200 to 4500 nucleotides depending on selected antigen – the Coronavirus spike protein has 1273 amino acids – why is the vaccine producing a spike protein almost 4 times larger than the Covid virus?

253. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – There were 311 candidates in the vaccine group who had other important protocol deviations on or prior to 7 days after Dose 2 – what were these deviations and did they include vaccine injuries? 254. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial why were 1790 excluded from valuable efficacy in the placebo group – as per page 33 FOI 2389-1 255. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were only around 19,000 from each group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? 256. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were approximately 1250 people pulled from getting the second vaccine?

228. ACE receptors are not on all cells – does the TGA accept that the transfection process used by Pfizer makes the vaccine more pathogenic than the virus? The vaccine doesn’t target any cells, instead it targets all cells via transfection as shown in graphs on page 34 of the TGA Pfizer Non-Clinical report? 230. The non-clinical report noted one study that said 100% of people who had recovered from Covid had S protein specific CD4 t-cells and 70% had CD8 t-cells – if this is the case why is natural immunity being ignored for those who had Covid in favor of further boosters?

231. The non-clinical report noted there were no studies on the protection of older animals – given it was older people who are susceptible why were older animals excluded? 232. The non-clinical report noted that monkeys were not a good animal model of severe Covid 19 in humans – if this is case why use monkeys in a trial for a disease, they are not a good model for? 233. The non-clinical report noted vaccine induced auto immune diseases were not studied in the non-clinical program and should be addressed by clinical data. If this is the case, why are humans being used as guinea pigs? 259. How can the TGA discount the increased number of supernumerary ribs in vaccinated pregnant rats as not being a safety signal? Shouldn’t more testing have taken place? 268. Why is the TGA refusing to provide information relating to “All Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Studies available to the TGA regarding the Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines including histology reports of gonads of vaccinated animals”

229. As per the TGA non-clinical report – “there was very mild inflammation of lung tissues in both the control and vaccinated group 7 or 8 days after challenge with no difference in the inflammation score.” Given these results how can the TGA say the vaccine reduced lung infections from Covid? 234. The non-clinical report noted that the potential of vaccine to induce cytokine release was not adequately assessed in non-clinical trials. Why did the TGA approve the vaccine given such a risk was not properly understood? 235. On page 34 and page 35 pf the TGA non-clinical report the transfection and expression rates of the modified mRNA’s are much higher – isn’t that proof that the vaccine is much more pathogenic and infectious than the virus? 241. Why didn’t the TGA mention the use of methylpseudouridine in the non-clinical report? 245. In Section 2.4 on page 36 of TGA non-clinical report the structure of the spike protein is redacted – why is that?

198. In a previous reply to a QON the TGA stated “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not routinely publish the number of adverse events reported as serious. This is because simple reporting of the number and type of adverse event reports, including the number of reports assigned by reporters to one of the seriousness criteria, is not a valid method for assessing vaccine safety”. Simple reporting has been used to report Covid cases and deaths which has then been used to mandate experimental gene technology that did not undergo rigorous testing – why are vaccines injuries and deaths held to a higher level of scrutiny and covid cases and deaths? 236. FOI 3727 reveals a number of deaths in people younger than 35 from the vaccine, including a 7, 9, 14 and 19 year old. Given these deaths why wasn’t the vaccine rollout paused? 240. Is the Covid vaccine history of all Coroner reported deaths – included for consideration in the Forensic Pathologist’s autopsy report – or all medical certificates of death?

158. Is the Health Department concerned about corruption within Australia’s regulatory body? 208. According to Section 9 of the TGA own advertising code “An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be: (a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or (b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or (c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.” 209. Despite this every authority in the country touted the vaccines as safe and effective without qualifying the risks. Haven’t they broken the law? 217. Why are you fining small companies for breaches of law that had no adverse events while ignoring the negligent behavior of Big Pharma? How are small Australian companies importing a small number of RAT tests for testing or Ivermectin that are no risk to the public worse than the behavior of big pharmaceuticals?

117. Has the TGA accessed/obtained current Australian background rates for adverse events/subclinical conditions from hospital admission data, NPS MedicineWise and/or general practice data and compared it with pre vaccination rollout data from the same source? 118. In the last round of estimates Prof Skerritt claimed that millions could have died or gone to hospital from Covid – can he please provide the modelling for that claim? Given there has been 6 million deaths from Covid in almost three years, it does sound a bit rich to claim those numbers in a country of just 25 million does it not?

119. Has the Federal government covered half the hospital costs for people in hospital with Covid? Was this money reimbursed to State governments? If so, doesn’t this create an incentive for State government to fudge Covid cases in hospital in order to milk the Federal government of Funding? 120. Does the Federal government reimbursing states such as NSW for back capturing whereby that State government counts people as having Covid, even if they had it 28 days prior to entering hospital and went to hospital for another reason such as a broken arm?

146. Why doesn’t the TGA have mandatory reporting requirements of Health professionals for reporting adverse events? Shouldn’t it be mandatory given that the vaccines have only received provisional approval and data from ongoing trials are being assessed on an outgoing basis? 148. In the Post marketing surveillance data there is over 1,000 adverse events of interest – what exactly are adverse events of interest – are they reported adverse events? 149. If the current vaccines fall outside many of the international guidelines for testing vaccines, then isn’t it fair to say they aren’t vaccines. 150. In the post marketing surveillance data – what was the total population of the administered doses? I note this figure has been censored by Pfizer and the FDA – why is such an important indicator of safety being covered up and why won’t the TGA ask for that number and then disclose it? 151. Why did the TGA change death description to Adverse Event following immunisation to avoid scrutiny over cause of death regarding a number of young children were reported to have died from the vaccine?

185. Studies have shown that neutrophils interact with spike proteins to create fibrils that lead to amyloids clots. Has the TGA examined this risk, and can they guarantee that amyloid clots aren’t being formed by the vaccine? 190. I note that the Europeans Medicine Agency has added heavy menstrual bleeding as a side effect of Pfizer and Moderna Covid jabs. Given this delayed warning what testing will the TGA do to ensure that the heavy bleeding isn’t the result of clots and that women are not at danger of having their fertility damaged?

169. In FOI 2389-3 4.3.3 it says “RNA itself, and the lipids used in the BNT162 vaccines have no carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Furthermore, according to ICH SIA, no carcinogenicity studies are required for therapeutics that are not continuously administered. Therefore, no carcinogenicity studies were performed.’ Why is carcinogenicity not tested if boosters are being continually rolled out? 170. In FOI 2389-3 5.3.1.7 regarding coagulation it says “Increases in fibrinogen levels were detected in all vaccinated animals at the end of dosing phase and were consistent with an acute phase response secondary to immune activation and inflammation at the injection sites.” Given clotting was a recognised side effect of the vaccine on what basis can the TGA rule out strokes and other clotting related events? 249. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – page 109 FOI 2389-3 – how is this different to the Covid spike protein mRNA cap? 250. FOI 2389-3 page 20 – some LNPs can be twice as big as others 60-120 nano metres Does this mean that some vaccine lipids can be twice as toxic or efficacious, or some people will get twice the dose of others? 251. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine as per FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 – Theorical length is from 1200 to 4500 nucleotides depending on selected antigen – the Coronavirus spike protein has 1273 amino acids – why is the vaccine producing a spike protein almost 4 times larger than the Covid virus?

253. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – There were 311 candidates in the vaccine group who had other important protocol deviations on or prior to 7 days after Dose 2 – what were these deviations and did they include vaccine injuries? 254. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial why were 1790 excluded from valuable efficacy in the placebo group – as per page 33 FOI 2389-1 255. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were only around 19,000 from each group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? 256. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were approximately 1250 people pulled from getting the second vaccine?

228. ACE receptors are not on all cells – does the TGA accept that the transfection process used by Pfizer makes the vaccine more pathogenic than the virus? The vaccine doesn’t target any cells, instead it targets all cells via transfection as shown in graphs on page 34 of the TGA Pfizer Non-Clinical report? 230. The non-clinical report noted one study that said 100% of people who had recovered from Covid had S protein specific CD4 t-cells and 70% had CD8 t-cells – if this is the case why is natural immunity being ignored for those who had Covid in favor of further boosters?

231. The non-clinical report noted there were no studies on the protection of older animals – given it was older people who are susceptible why were older animals excluded? 232. The non-clinical report noted that monkeys were not a good animal model of severe Covid 19 in humans – if this is case why use monkeys in a trial for a disease, they are not a good model for? 233. The non-clinical report noted vaccine induced auto immune diseases were not studied in the non-clinical program and should be addressed by clinical data. If this is the case, why are humans being used as guinea pigs? 259. How can the TGA discount the increased number of supernumerary ribs in vaccinated pregnant rats as not being a safety signal? Shouldn’t more testing have taken place? 268. Why is the TGA refusing to provide information relating to “All Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Studies available to the TGA regarding the Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines including histology reports of gonads of vaccinated animals”

229. As per the TGA non-clinical report – “there was very mild inflammation of lung tissues in both the control and vaccinated group 7 or 8 days after challenge with no difference in the inflammation score.” Given these results how can the TGA say the vaccine reduced lung infections from Covid? 234. The non-clinical report noted that the potential of vaccine to induce cytokine release was not adequately assessed in non-clinical trials. Why did the TGA approve the vaccine given such a risk was not properly understood? 235. On page 34 and page 35 pf the TGA non-clinical report the transfection and expression rates of the modified mRNA’s are much higher – isn’t that proof that the vaccine is much more pathogenic and infectious than the virus? 241. Why didn’t the TGA mention the use of methylpseudouridine in the non-clinical report? 245. In Section 2.4 on page 36 of TGA non-clinical report the structure of the spike protein is redacted – why is that?

198. In a previous reply to a QON the TGA stated “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not routinely publish the number of adverse events reported as serious. This is because simple reporting of the number and type of adverse event reports, including the number of reports assigned by reporters to one of the seriousness criteria, is not a valid method for assessing vaccine safety”. Simple reporting has been used to report Covid cases and deaths which has then been used to mandate experimental gene technology that did not undergo rigorous testing – why are vaccines injuries and deaths held to a higher level of scrutiny and covid cases and deaths? 236. FOI 3727 reveals a number of deaths in people younger than 35 from the vaccine, including a 7, 9, 14 and 19 year old. Given these deaths why wasn’t the vaccine rollout paused? 240. Is the Covid vaccine history of all Coroner reported deaths – included for consideration in the Forensic Pathologist’s autopsy report – or all medical certificates of death?

158. Is the Health Department concerned about corruption within Australia’s regulatory body? 208. According to Section 9 of the TGA own advertising code “An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be: (a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or (b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or (c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.” 209. Despite this every authority in the country touted the vaccines as safe and effective without qualifying the risks. Haven’t they broken the law? 217. Why are you fining small companies for breaches of law that had no adverse events while ignoring the negligent behavior of Big Pharma? How are small Australian companies importing a small number of RAT tests for testing or Ivermectin that are no risk to the public worse than the behavior of big pharmaceuticals?

117. Has the TGA accessed/obtained current Australian background rates for adverse events/subclinical conditions from hospital admission data, NPS MedicineWise and/or general practice data and compared it with pre vaccination rollout data from the same source? 118. In the last round of estimates Prof Skerritt claimed that millions could have died or gone to hospital from Covid – can he please provide the modelling for that claim? Given there has been 6 million deaths from Covid in almost three years, it does sound a bit rich to claim those numbers in a country of just 25 million does it not?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard