Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

244. Why did the TGA approve molnupiravir despite the fact there were concerns that the drug may cause cancer mutations? It is known in medicine that mutation of a single base is sufficient to cause disease, sickle cell anaemia being one example. – https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/public-health/2022/08/the-suppression-of-usefulcovid-19-treatments/ 261. Until recently patients presenting with anti-bodies to their thyroids have had it stated on their blood results that ‘the antibody pattern suggests an underlying autoimmune inflammatory process e.g. Graves’ and Hashimoto’s’. The way to examine these results was changed on 06/09/21 and the reference interval was updated. Why has the reference interval been updated/changed and is it true that Medicare requested QML that such wording be removed from patients’ written test results?

227. The virus needs two enzymes to cross the membrane whereas the vaccine needs none as it relies in transfection – is that correct? If that is the case, then is it fair to say the vaccine is more infectious, isn’t it? 286. Aren’t nasal sprays better than vaccines for respiratory viruses that enter through the airways? 287. What steps or tests has the health department taken to ensure that immune imprinting or antibody dependent enhancement is not occurring with repeated booster shots. This is a well-known phenomenon, dengue fever being a prime example. It was highlighted by Pfizer as a potential risk. Furthermore, why isn’t this potential risk highlighted in any Covid booster advertising? 290. Is the overuse of booster and the use of a stronger spike protein causing the immune system to downregulate in other areas leading to cancer and diabetes?

257. The TGA report on the Pfizer vaccine said, “The duration of protection afforded by COMIRNATY is unknown as it is still being determined by ongoing clinical trials.” – why did the TGA say it was safe and effective if you didn’t know how effective it was going to be. See 2389-2 page 6? 258. As per Page 7 of FOI 2389-2 – given the high mortality rate in the older age group don’t you think the Covid Pfizer vaccine rollout should be stopped? To quote “The data for use in the frail elderly (>85 years) is limited. The potential benefits of vaccination versus the potential risk and clinical impact of even relatively mild systemic adverse events in the frail elderly should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis”

135. In a prior round of estimates Prof Skerritt said “No evidence of damage. You seem to be indicating that these are little arrows that are piercing holes in things. The protein by itself does not cause damage”. The vaccine induces an immune response that requires the body’s own cells to be attacked and destroyed. How can Professor Skerritt say the spike protein doesn’t cause any damage or induce a cell-mediated immune attack against host cells that translate the mRNA to spike protein and then place the antigen on the cell surface to invoke an immune response? 136. Does the vaccine contain instructions to turn off the toll like receptors to the mRNA. If so how dangerous is this? 144. The fact that the vaccine spike protein stays in the body for 60 days indicates that it is more toxic than the normal virus which for most people is cleared from the body in a matter of weeks rather than months. Does the TGA disagree with this statement? If so, why?

260. The UK has pulled the vaccine for pregnant women – Why isn’t Australia doing the same thing? 264. FluVax was introduced in 2010. A few babies died from it, some were severely and permanently injured, and 1 in 10 children suffered an adverse event, The vaccine company (CSL) denied responsibility for as long as they could, before the evidence was overwhelming. Why are Health departments continuing with the Covid vaccine rollout that have higher injury rates? There are numerous other examples of where drugs have been pulled on far fewer safety signals.

137. In the post marketing data only 32 of 270 pregnancies were reported on and most of the 32 were miscarriages. Why didn’t the TGA follow up on the other 238 pregnancies and given the missing data how could the TGA say that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women? Was there ever any follow up on the other woman who didn’t initially provide data? 138. I note that the TGA has previously said “Post-market global surveillance data from large numbers of pregnant women have not identified any significant safety concerns with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines given at any stage during pregnancy. There is no evidence of decreased fertility, increased risk of miscarriage or teratogenic risk” Why would the TGA say this given the missing data in the post marketing data and the fact that the vaccine was only tested on pregnant rats?

171. What role does Adjutor play in regulating and approving vaccines – has the TGA outsourced regulatory activities to a third party? 177. Why has the TGA allowed Pfizer/Moderna to set integrity and purity requirements? 265. Why is the Health Department claiming the approval process for the vaccines wasn’t rushed when in fact it was. Furthermore no carcinogenic, genotoxicity or longitudinal studies were completed. And I quote: “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally approved these vaccines after a complete assessment of all the available data. This is the same process as any vaccine approved in this country. The TGA will only register and approve a COVID19 vaccine if it is safe and effective.” www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-truewere-covid-19-vaccines-rushed-through-approvals-or-given-emergency-useauthorisations-in-australia.

270. Page 64 – FOI 2389-3-2 – Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AEs or SAEs after the participant has concluded study participation? If investigators don’t have to seek out all adverse events how does the TGA know the investigator has detected all possible side effects? 271. As per Page 64- FOI 2389-3-2 – All pregnancies have to be reported to the sponsor – if this is the case why is so much data on pregnancy missing from the Pfizer Covid vaccine post marketing data? 272. I note on page 69 of FOI 2389-3-2 that adverse events of special interest aren’t applicable but that in the post marketing data there are over 1000 of them mentioned? 273. Of the circa 44,000 participants in the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial how many were checked up at the 6-month, 12 month and 24 month time frame as per the requirements of the CT02-GSOP Clinical Protocol Template Phase 1 2 3 4 (05 December 2019) (around pages 80-90 of 2389-3-2)?

140. On page 47 of the TGA non-clinical report it states no unique in-vivo metabolites of ALC- 0159 were observed in the rat pharmacokinetic study, but N,N-ditetradecylamine formed by slow amide hydrolysis was identified in hepatocytes and liver S9 fractions from mouse, rat, monkey and human – Substances predicted as likely to meet criteria for category 1A or 1B carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive toxicity, or with dispersive or diffuse use(s) where predicted likely to meet any classification criterion for health or environmental hazards, or where there is a nanoform soluble in biological and environmental media. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/- /substanceinfo/100.037.611 141. Why didn’t the TGA identify the accumulation of N,N-ditetradecylamine a risk from the vaccine?

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

89. In the TGA non-clinical report it states “the S protein is synthesised and processed within the ER for surface expression or secretion.” Why is the vaccine stimulating the human body to export the spike protein from the cell – shouldn’t it be sterilising the virus rather than reproducing it? 90. What impact does the secretion of spike proteins have on the endothelium and other sensitive body organs? 91. Has the TGA done any research on the secretion of proteins from the cell as a result of the vaccine? If not, why not? 92. What evidence does the TGA have to prove that proteins secreted from the cells don’t cause clots and damage to body organs? 93. How does the TGA know that the ribosome translates the mRNA code 100% accurately and no mutations occur if no mutagenic studies have been done? 94. Has the TGA done any distribution and degradation studies to determine the potential toxicity of the secreted spike protein. If not, why not?

80. In the prior set of estimates Prof Skerrit said that the lipids used in the vaccine are like the lipids you have in a steak for breakfast. This is not the case – as per Pfizers own website they are special ionised lipids designed to cross the cell membrane. Will Prof Skerritt withdraw his prior remark? 81. Lipids are hydrophobic not hydrophilic – by cationising them you have completely changed their characteristics from inactive to active -why did Prof Skerritt mislead the senate when he said the lipids were like the lipids you find in sausages/steak for breakfast? 82. Given these lipids are ionised and therefore an active ingredient what studies have been undertaken to ensure they were not harmful to the human body? 83. What studies were undertaken to ensure that the cationic lipids don’t create reactive oxygen species which can cause irreversible damage to DNA? 84. If the ionic lipids can enter any cells via electroporation or transfection then aren’t they more infectious than the virus which can only enter cells that contain ACE and TMPRRS enzymes that facilitate the virus entering the cell? 85. Can the lipids enter both white and red blood cells? I note that lipids entered both the spleen and bone marrow in the rat studies? 86. Given the lipids are taken up by the ovaries what guarantees can the TGA give that eggs are not being damaged. Obstetricians are reporting that they are seeing clusters of low Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in young women 95. The bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes are responsible for producing white blood cells and regulating the while blood cells in the blood and the lymphatic system. Given that lipids can enter these organs and induce an autoimmune response against the cells in these body organs isn’t there a serious risk that the vaccine can induce autoimmune diseases?

163. Hasn’t Pfizer and Co broken the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by failing to report all the adverse events from their trials and post marketing surveillance (refer to patient records)? Under paragraph 28(5)(ca) of the Act, you MUST retain records pertaining to the reporting requirements and safety for your medicine. (page 29 of 44) 164. What is the legislation that details the TGAs responsibilities in regard to post market safety surveillance data? Why hasn’t the TGA sought to allay the publics fear over data that shows an alarming number of adverse events and poor quality assurance practices? 202. Does the TGA do post marketing surveillance at all over and above that of the sponsor? If not, why not? What is the point of having an independent regulator if it doesn’t do independent safety testing?

166. The AusVax safety data showed over 5 million people reported side effects 3 days after taking the Covid-19 vaccine and around 1 in 100 had to see a doctor or go to emergency just 3 days after taking a vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high? 167. The AusVax safety data says 8% reported missing work, study or routine duties after dose 1 of the Covid vaccine, 21% after dose 2 of the Covid vaccine and 15% after dose 3 of the Covid vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high?

88. FOI 2565 requested “Histopathology/microscopic evaluation of gonads (ovaries/testes) of vaccinated animals in relation to Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines”. This application has been rejected three times, and was rejected finally by the internal reviewers on 27 Sep 2021. Why is the TGA withholding reports of ovarian and testicular effects of an investigational (provisionally registered) vaccine. Particularly in the context of vaccine mandates being imposed upon men and women of reproductive age in various occupational sectors, and now on children and teens with their reproductive years ahead of them?

43. In the post marketing report on page 6 it says “Pfizer has also taken multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.” Surely if the vaccine was safe and effective Pfizer wouldn’t need to employ an additional 1,800 staff to deal with adverse events? Isn’t this in itself a concerning safety signal?

45. As per the TGA non-clinical report, there are no data on the kinetics of BNT162b2 mRNA degradation (page 10). There are no distribution and degradation data on the S antigen-encoding mRNA. (Page 4) How can Health Authorities claim the vaccines are safe when no comprehensive testing was carried on the spike protein which has known toxic properties? 46. Studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs. Why is the TGA ignoring this and more importantly continuing to promote the vaccine as safe and effective when the side effects are not understood and there is ample evidence of adverse events? 47. Given studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs, how can the TGA prove long Covid isn’t a result of the vaccine and not the virus? Are long covid tests being carried out to determine if the cause of the injury is from the vaccine or the virus? Are medical biomarkers such as the N protein and Methylpseudouridine being tracked to determine cause of long Covid?

244. Why did the TGA approve molnupiravir despite the fact there were concerns that the drug may cause cancer mutations? It is known in medicine that mutation of a single base is sufficient to cause disease, sickle cell anaemia being one example. – https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/public-health/2022/08/the-suppression-of-usefulcovid-19-treatments/ 261. Until recently patients presenting with anti-bodies to their thyroids have had it stated on their blood results that ‘the antibody pattern suggests an underlying autoimmune inflammatory process e.g. Graves’ and Hashimoto’s’. The way to examine these results was changed on 06/09/21 and the reference interval was updated. Why has the reference interval been updated/changed and is it true that Medicare requested QML that such wording be removed from patients’ written test results?

227. The virus needs two enzymes to cross the membrane whereas the vaccine needs none as it relies in transfection – is that correct? If that is the case, then is it fair to say the vaccine is more infectious, isn’t it? 286. Aren’t nasal sprays better than vaccines for respiratory viruses that enter through the airways? 287. What steps or tests has the health department taken to ensure that immune imprinting or antibody dependent enhancement is not occurring with repeated booster shots. This is a well-known phenomenon, dengue fever being a prime example. It was highlighted by Pfizer as a potential risk. Furthermore, why isn’t this potential risk highlighted in any Covid booster advertising? 290. Is the overuse of booster and the use of a stronger spike protein causing the immune system to downregulate in other areas leading to cancer and diabetes?

257. The TGA report on the Pfizer vaccine said, “The duration of protection afforded by COMIRNATY is unknown as it is still being determined by ongoing clinical trials.” – why did the TGA say it was safe and effective if you didn’t know how effective it was going to be. See 2389-2 page 6? 258. As per Page 7 of FOI 2389-2 – given the high mortality rate in the older age group don’t you think the Covid Pfizer vaccine rollout should be stopped? To quote “The data for use in the frail elderly (>85 years) is limited. The potential benefits of vaccination versus the potential risk and clinical impact of even relatively mild systemic adverse events in the frail elderly should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis”

135. In a prior round of estimates Prof Skerritt said “No evidence of damage. You seem to be indicating that these are little arrows that are piercing holes in things. The protein by itself does not cause damage”. The vaccine induces an immune response that requires the body’s own cells to be attacked and destroyed. How can Professor Skerritt say the spike protein doesn’t cause any damage or induce a cell-mediated immune attack against host cells that translate the mRNA to spike protein and then place the antigen on the cell surface to invoke an immune response? 136. Does the vaccine contain instructions to turn off the toll like receptors to the mRNA. If so how dangerous is this? 144. The fact that the vaccine spike protein stays in the body for 60 days indicates that it is more toxic than the normal virus which for most people is cleared from the body in a matter of weeks rather than months. Does the TGA disagree with this statement? If so, why?

260. The UK has pulled the vaccine for pregnant women – Why isn’t Australia doing the same thing? 264. FluVax was introduced in 2010. A few babies died from it, some were severely and permanently injured, and 1 in 10 children suffered an adverse event, The vaccine company (CSL) denied responsibility for as long as they could, before the evidence was overwhelming. Why are Health departments continuing with the Covid vaccine rollout that have higher injury rates? There are numerous other examples of where drugs have been pulled on far fewer safety signals.

137. In the post marketing data only 32 of 270 pregnancies were reported on and most of the 32 were miscarriages. Why didn’t the TGA follow up on the other 238 pregnancies and given the missing data how could the TGA say that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women? Was there ever any follow up on the other woman who didn’t initially provide data? 138. I note that the TGA has previously said “Post-market global surveillance data from large numbers of pregnant women have not identified any significant safety concerns with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines given at any stage during pregnancy. There is no evidence of decreased fertility, increased risk of miscarriage or teratogenic risk” Why would the TGA say this given the missing data in the post marketing data and the fact that the vaccine was only tested on pregnant rats?

171. What role does Adjutor play in regulating and approving vaccines – has the TGA outsourced regulatory activities to a third party? 177. Why has the TGA allowed Pfizer/Moderna to set integrity and purity requirements? 265. Why is the Health Department claiming the approval process for the vaccines wasn’t rushed when in fact it was. Furthermore no carcinogenic, genotoxicity or longitudinal studies were completed. And I quote: “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally approved these vaccines after a complete assessment of all the available data. This is the same process as any vaccine approved in this country. The TGA will only register and approve a COVID19 vaccine if it is safe and effective.” www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-truewere-covid-19-vaccines-rushed-through-approvals-or-given-emergency-useauthorisations-in-australia.

270. Page 64 – FOI 2389-3-2 – Investigators are not obligated to actively seek AEs or SAEs after the participant has concluded study participation? If investigators don’t have to seek out all adverse events how does the TGA know the investigator has detected all possible side effects? 271. As per Page 64- FOI 2389-3-2 – All pregnancies have to be reported to the sponsor – if this is the case why is so much data on pregnancy missing from the Pfizer Covid vaccine post marketing data? 272. I note on page 69 of FOI 2389-3-2 that adverse events of special interest aren’t applicable but that in the post marketing data there are over 1000 of them mentioned? 273. Of the circa 44,000 participants in the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial how many were checked up at the 6-month, 12 month and 24 month time frame as per the requirements of the CT02-GSOP Clinical Protocol Template Phase 1 2 3 4 (05 December 2019) (around pages 80-90 of 2389-3-2)?

140. On page 47 of the TGA non-clinical report it states no unique in-vivo metabolites of ALC- 0159 were observed in the rat pharmacokinetic study, but N,N-ditetradecylamine formed by slow amide hydrolysis was identified in hepatocytes and liver S9 fractions from mouse, rat, monkey and human – Substances predicted as likely to meet criteria for category 1A or 1B carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive toxicity, or with dispersive or diffuse use(s) where predicted likely to meet any classification criterion for health or environmental hazards, or where there is a nanoform soluble in biological and environmental media. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/- /substanceinfo/100.037.611 141. Why didn’t the TGA identify the accumulation of N,N-ditetradecylamine a risk from the vaccine?

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

89. In the TGA non-clinical report it states “the S protein is synthesised and processed within the ER for surface expression or secretion.” Why is the vaccine stimulating the human body to export the spike protein from the cell – shouldn’t it be sterilising the virus rather than reproducing it? 90. What impact does the secretion of spike proteins have on the endothelium and other sensitive body organs? 91. Has the TGA done any research on the secretion of proteins from the cell as a result of the vaccine? If not, why not? 92. What evidence does the TGA have to prove that proteins secreted from the cells don’t cause clots and damage to body organs? 93. How does the TGA know that the ribosome translates the mRNA code 100% accurately and no mutations occur if no mutagenic studies have been done? 94. Has the TGA done any distribution and degradation studies to determine the potential toxicity of the secreted spike protein. If not, why not?

80. In the prior set of estimates Prof Skerrit said that the lipids used in the vaccine are like the lipids you have in a steak for breakfast. This is not the case – as per Pfizers own website they are special ionised lipids designed to cross the cell membrane. Will Prof Skerritt withdraw his prior remark? 81. Lipids are hydrophobic not hydrophilic – by cationising them you have completely changed their characteristics from inactive to active -why did Prof Skerritt mislead the senate when he said the lipids were like the lipids you find in sausages/steak for breakfast? 82. Given these lipids are ionised and therefore an active ingredient what studies have been undertaken to ensure they were not harmful to the human body? 83. What studies were undertaken to ensure that the cationic lipids don’t create reactive oxygen species which can cause irreversible damage to DNA? 84. If the ionic lipids can enter any cells via electroporation or transfection then aren’t they more infectious than the virus which can only enter cells that contain ACE and TMPRRS enzymes that facilitate the virus entering the cell? 85. Can the lipids enter both white and red blood cells? I note that lipids entered both the spleen and bone marrow in the rat studies? 86. Given the lipids are taken up by the ovaries what guarantees can the TGA give that eggs are not being damaged. Obstetricians are reporting that they are seeing clusters of low Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in young women 95. The bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes are responsible for producing white blood cells and regulating the while blood cells in the blood and the lymphatic system. Given that lipids can enter these organs and induce an autoimmune response against the cells in these body organs isn’t there a serious risk that the vaccine can induce autoimmune diseases?

163. Hasn’t Pfizer and Co broken the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by failing to report all the adverse events from their trials and post marketing surveillance (refer to patient records)? Under paragraph 28(5)(ca) of the Act, you MUST retain records pertaining to the reporting requirements and safety for your medicine. (page 29 of 44) 164. What is the legislation that details the TGAs responsibilities in regard to post market safety surveillance data? Why hasn’t the TGA sought to allay the publics fear over data that shows an alarming number of adverse events and poor quality assurance practices? 202. Does the TGA do post marketing surveillance at all over and above that of the sponsor? If not, why not? What is the point of having an independent regulator if it doesn’t do independent safety testing?

166. The AusVax safety data showed over 5 million people reported side effects 3 days after taking the Covid-19 vaccine and around 1 in 100 had to see a doctor or go to emergency just 3 days after taking a vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high? 167. The AusVax safety data says 8% reported missing work, study or routine duties after dose 1 of the Covid vaccine, 21% after dose 2 of the Covid vaccine and 15% after dose 3 of the Covid vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high?

88. FOI 2565 requested “Histopathology/microscopic evaluation of gonads (ovaries/testes) of vaccinated animals in relation to Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines”. This application has been rejected three times, and was rejected finally by the internal reviewers on 27 Sep 2021. Why is the TGA withholding reports of ovarian and testicular effects of an investigational (provisionally registered) vaccine. Particularly in the context of vaccine mandates being imposed upon men and women of reproductive age in various occupational sectors, and now on children and teens with their reproductive years ahead of them?

43. In the post marketing report on page 6 it says “Pfizer has also taken multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports. This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues. To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs). More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.” Surely if the vaccine was safe and effective Pfizer wouldn’t need to employ an additional 1,800 staff to deal with adverse events? Isn’t this in itself a concerning safety signal?

45. As per the TGA non-clinical report, there are no data on the kinetics of BNT162b2 mRNA degradation (page 10). There are no distribution and degradation data on the S antigen-encoding mRNA. (Page 4) How can Health Authorities claim the vaccines are safe when no comprehensive testing was carried on the spike protein which has known toxic properties? 46. Studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs. Why is the TGA ignoring this and more importantly continuing to promote the vaccine as safe and effective when the side effects are not understood and there is ample evidence of adverse events? 47. Given studies are showing the long-term persistence of the spike protein in various body organs, how can the TGA prove long Covid isn’t a result of the vaccine and not the virus? Are long covid tests being carried out to determine if the cause of the injury is from the vaccine or the virus? Are medical biomarkers such as the N protein and Methylpseudouridine being tracked to determine cause of long Covid?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard