Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

Stay up to date...

JOIN MY MAILING LIST

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

169. In FOI 2389-3 4.3.3 it says “RNA itself, and the lipids used in the BNT162 vaccines have no carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Furthermore, according to ICH SIA, no carcinogenicity studies are required for therapeutics that are not continuously administered. Therefore, no carcinogenicity studies were performed.’ Why is carcinogenicity not tested if boosters are being continually rolled out? 170. In FOI 2389-3 5.3.1.7 regarding coagulation it says “Increases in fibrinogen levels were detected in all vaccinated animals at the end of dosing phase and were consistent with an acute phase response secondary to immune activation and inflammation at the injection sites.” Given clotting was a recognised side effect of the vaccine on what basis can the TGA rule out strokes and other clotting related events? 249. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – page 109 FOI 2389-3 – how is this different to the Covid spike protein mRNA cap? 250. FOI 2389-3 page 20 – some LNPs can be twice as big as others 60-120 nano metres Does this mean that some vaccine lipids can be twice as toxic or efficacious, or some people will get twice the dose of others? 251. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine as per FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 – Theorical length is from 1200 to 4500 nucleotides depending on selected antigen – the Coronavirus spike protein has 1273 amino acids – why is the vaccine producing a spike protein almost 4 times larger than the Covid virus?

21/11/2022

253. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – There were 311 candidates in the vaccine group who had other important protocol deviations on or prior to 7 days after Dose 2 – what were these deviations and did they include vaccine injuries? 254. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial why were 1790 excluded from valuable efficacy in the placebo group – as per page 33 FOI 2389-1 255. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were only around 19,000 from each group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? 256. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were approximately 1250 people pulled from getting the second vaccine?

21/11/2022

158. Is the Health Department concerned about corruption within Australia’s regulatory body? 208. According to Section 9 of the TGA own advertising code “An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be: (a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or (b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or (c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.” 209. Despite this every authority in the country touted the vaccines as safe and effective without qualifying the risks. Haven’t they broken the law? 217. Why are you fining small companies for breaches of law that had no adverse events while ignoring the negligent behavior of Big Pharma? How are small Australian companies importing a small number of RAT tests for testing or Ivermectin that are no risk to the public worse than the behavior of big pharmaceuticals?

21/11/2022

117. Has the TGA accessed/obtained current Australian background rates for adverse events/subclinical conditions from hospital admission data, NPS MedicineWise and/or general practice data and compared it with pre vaccination rollout data from the same source? 118. In the last round of estimates Prof Skerritt claimed that millions could have died or gone to hospital from Covid – can he please provide the modelling for that claim? Given there has been 6 million deaths from Covid in almost three years, it does sound a bit rich to claim those numbers in a country of just 25 million does it not?

21/11/2022

182. As per FOI 2986, in January 2021 the TGA recruited a new lead to run the Pharmacovigilance “vaccine safety” system – Michael Nissen. Michael Nissen spent 8 prior years working for GSK (whose healthcare division merged with Pfizer in 2019). How can the TGA claim there are no conflicts of interest when it own staff are long term Big Pharma employees? 220. The serious injury rate of vaccines is 1 in a 1000 people which is much higher than serious rate of injury from omicron – why hasn’t the TGA pulled the vaccine? 226. Isn’t there an inherent conflict of interest between the TGA approving drugs and then reviewing vaccine injuries from those drugs that is has previously claimed as safe? 247. Given the AZ and Pfizer shot are expected to do the same thing then how can the TGA claim they don’t have similar side effects?

21/11/2022

121. Of the 44,000 people who participated in the Pfizer trial, how many clinical record forms were kept by Pfizer? (Note everyone should have file per link) 122. Of the 44,0000 clinical record forms how many did the TGA check? 123. Regulatory Documents show only 9 sites out of 152 Pfizer sites were subject to FDA inspection and only 10 out of 99 Moderna sites were subject to FDA inspection. How many sites did the TGA inspect and why does the TGA think its acceptable that such a small number of sites were inspected, especially since this was the first time mRNA vaccines were produced commercially for the first time? 124. How is it that a principal investigator of the Pfizer trial, Fernando Polack could recruit 4,500 patients in 3 weeks at one site? He was also at Vanderbilt in the period and happened to make appearances for the FDA and is also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation and the NIH. Yet presumably while doing this he managed to find time to recruit 4,500 patients in 3 weeks with each patient requiring 250 pages of case report forms. This is over 1,125,000 pages in three weeks? Does the TGA stand by the trails results of that Pfizer site in Argentina in that three-week period given the enormous caseload?

21/11/2022

225. Pfizer wanted to switch the “phosphate- buffered saline” used in previous adult formulations, to “tromethamine (Tris) buffer” and to exclude both sodium chloride and potassium chloride, claiming it “improved the stability profile of the vaccine.” A Pfizer spokesperson said, “This allows the mRNA to resist being degraded for a longer period of time before administration – meaning the pediatric vaccine can be stored [at] 2-8°C in commonly available refrigerators for up to 10 weeks.” If the half-life is going to take longer to degrade isn’t that going to increase the pathogenicity of the vaccine for children? 238. Why are there five doses in an adult vial and 10 doses in a children’s vial? Why didn’t the sponsors make it one dose per vial to ensure an even distribution of the vaccine. How can the TGA be sure that the person administering the vaccine is actually giving consistent concentrations?

21/11/2022

228. ACE receptors are not on all cells – does the TGA accept that the transfection process used by Pfizer makes the vaccine more pathogenic than the virus? The vaccine doesn’t target any cells, instead it targets all cells via transfection as shown in graphs on page 34 of the TGA Pfizer Non-Clinical report? 230. The non-clinical report noted one study that said 100% of people who had recovered from Covid had S protein specific CD4 t-cells and 70% had CD8 t-cells – if this is the case why is natural immunity being ignored for those who had Covid in favor of further boosters?

21/11/2022

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

21/11/2022

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

21/11/2022

8. Has any safety testing been carried out in either humans or animals to determine the side effects of receiving 5 mRNA vaccines? 9. How is it that any deaths with a positive covid test is classed as a Covid death regardless of cause while any death after a vaccine isn’t classed as a vaccine death? Given the vaccine is still only provisionally approved shouldn’t all deaths with 6-8 weeks of receiving a vaccine be treated as a vaccine death until proven otherwise? 10. What are the criteria for a death to be linked to a vaccine? 11. Health advice says the benefits outweigh the risks on having 3 jabs as a 16+ year old person who is otherwise healthy? Where are the trials/numbers that support this statement and how can the TGA/ATAGI say this when longitudinal, carcinogenic, genotoxicity and numerous other tests were not carried out? 12. Severe adverse injuries were only counted by Pfizer in their Covid-19 trial up to 1 month after 2nd jab leading to the number of vaccine injuries being understated. “Limitations of our study include that Pfizer’s SAE table did not include SAEs occurring past 1 month after dose 2. This reporting threshold may have led to an undercounting of serious AE’ in the Pfizer study” – Why does the TGA believe this is acceptable Quality Assurance when Professor Skerritt said on the Today show in early 2021 that serious injuries could occur up to 8 weeks after the vaccine? 13. What is the adverse injury run rate that the TGA considers acceptable for a safe vaccine/drug? What are the benchmarks for proving it was safe? 14. I note that the 6-month data from the Pfizer trials 20 people died in the inoculation group while 15 died in the placebo group. 5,241 had related adverse events in the vaccination group against 1,311 in the placebo group – 300% more, 262 had severe adverse events (interferes significantly with normal function) in the vaccination group v 150 in the placebo group – 75% more and 127 had a serious adverse event (hospitalisation or visit to ER) v 116 in the placebo group which is 10% more – so where exactly does the TGA and other health authorities come up with the statement that the vaccine was actually proven to be safe and effective?

21/11/2022

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

If a Commonwealth employee is (i) coerced into having a flu vaccine and their job does not require it; (ii) that vaccine results in a permanent neurological injury, for example, multiple sclerosis; (iii) the Commonwealth employee is independently assessed as having that neurological injury being triggered by the vaccine, and; (iv) Comcare accepts the employee’s claim, Will Comcare pay for all ongoing physical treatments* prescribed by a GP & neurologist, for the rest of that employee’s life, (a) if those physical treatments only serve to maintain (but not improve) that employee’s health? (b) if those physical treatments only serve to slow down that employee’s decline in health? By ‘physical treatments’ I am referring to * exercise physiology by a physiotherapist 3 times a week to ensure appropriately tailored exercises and to keep neural pathways open. Appropriate tailoring of exercises is also necessary to prevent the employee from suffering a further injury that would be foreseeable if they were left to their own devices to make up their own program; * remedial massage 1-2 times a week; * gym membership, and; * any other medically prescribed treatments

21/11/2022

(a) Does Comcare ‘audit’ workplaces such as Parliament House, to ensure the Department of Parliamentary Services has appropriate disability accommodation strategies in place, where an employee has a disability or workplace injury such as multiple sclerosis? (b) If yes, then what criteria does Comcare use to undertake such an audit and satisfy itself that disability is appropriately accommodated? (c) Does Comcare ever conduct a survey of those with such a disability at Parliament House to inform its findings in relation to such an ‘audit’?

21/11/2022

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

21/11/2022

169. In FOI 2389-3 4.3.3 it says “RNA itself, and the lipids used in the BNT162 vaccines have no carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Furthermore, according to ICH SIA, no carcinogenicity studies are required for therapeutics that are not continuously administered. Therefore, no carcinogenicity studies were performed.’ Why is carcinogenicity not tested if boosters are being continually rolled out? 170. In FOI 2389-3 5.3.1.7 regarding coagulation it says “Increases in fibrinogen levels were detected in all vaccinated animals at the end of dosing phase and were consistent with an acute phase response secondary to immune activation and inflammation at the injection sites.” Given clotting was a recognised side effect of the vaccine on what basis can the TGA rule out strokes and other clotting related events? 249. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – page 109 FOI 2389-3 – how is this different to the Covid spike protein mRNA cap? 250. FOI 2389-3 page 20 – some LNPs can be twice as big as others 60-120 nano metres Does this mean that some vaccine lipids can be twice as toxic or efficacious, or some people will get twice the dose of others? 251. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine as per FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 – Theorical length is from 1200 to 4500 nucleotides depending on selected antigen – the Coronavirus spike protein has 1273 amino acids – why is the vaccine producing a spike protein almost 4 times larger than the Covid virus?

21/11/2022

253. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – There were 311 candidates in the vaccine group who had other important protocol deviations on or prior to 7 days after Dose 2 – what were these deviations and did they include vaccine injuries? 254. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial why were 1790 excluded from valuable efficacy in the placebo group – as per page 33 FOI 2389-1 255. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were only around 19,000 from each group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated? 256. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial as per Page 33 on FOI 2389-1 – Why were approximately 1250 people pulled from getting the second vaccine?

21/11/2022

158. Is the Health Department concerned about corruption within Australia’s regulatory body? 208. According to Section 9 of the TGA own advertising code “An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be: (a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or (b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or (c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.” 209. Despite this every authority in the country touted the vaccines as safe and effective without qualifying the risks. Haven’t they broken the law? 217. Why are you fining small companies for breaches of law that had no adverse events while ignoring the negligent behavior of Big Pharma? How are small Australian companies importing a small number of RAT tests for testing or Ivermectin that are no risk to the public worse than the behavior of big pharmaceuticals?

21/11/2022

117. Has the TGA accessed/obtained current Australian background rates for adverse events/subclinical conditions from hospital admission data, NPS MedicineWise and/or general practice data and compared it with pre vaccination rollout data from the same source? 118. In the last round of estimates Prof Skerritt claimed that millions could have died or gone to hospital from Covid – can he please provide the modelling for that claim? Given there has been 6 million deaths from Covid in almost three years, it does sound a bit rich to claim those numbers in a country of just 25 million does it not?

21/11/2022

182. As per FOI 2986, in January 2021 the TGA recruited a new lead to run the Pharmacovigilance “vaccine safety” system – Michael Nissen. Michael Nissen spent 8 prior years working for GSK (whose healthcare division merged with Pfizer in 2019). How can the TGA claim there are no conflicts of interest when it own staff are long term Big Pharma employees? 220. The serious injury rate of vaccines is 1 in a 1000 people which is much higher than serious rate of injury from omicron – why hasn’t the TGA pulled the vaccine? 226. Isn’t there an inherent conflict of interest between the TGA approving drugs and then reviewing vaccine injuries from those drugs that is has previously claimed as safe? 247. Given the AZ and Pfizer shot are expected to do the same thing then how can the TGA claim they don’t have similar side effects?

21/11/2022

121. Of the 44,000 people who participated in the Pfizer trial, how many clinical record forms were kept by Pfizer? (Note everyone should have file per link) 122. Of the 44,0000 clinical record forms how many did the TGA check? 123. Regulatory Documents show only 9 sites out of 152 Pfizer sites were subject to FDA inspection and only 10 out of 99 Moderna sites were subject to FDA inspection. How many sites did the TGA inspect and why does the TGA think its acceptable that such a small number of sites were inspected, especially since this was the first time mRNA vaccines were produced commercially for the first time? 124. How is it that a principal investigator of the Pfizer trial, Fernando Polack could recruit 4,500 patients in 3 weeks at one site? He was also at Vanderbilt in the period and happened to make appearances for the FDA and is also funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation and the NIH. Yet presumably while doing this he managed to find time to recruit 4,500 patients in 3 weeks with each patient requiring 250 pages of case report forms. This is over 1,125,000 pages in three weeks? Does the TGA stand by the trails results of that Pfizer site in Argentina in that three-week period given the enormous caseload?

21/11/2022

225. Pfizer wanted to switch the “phosphate- buffered saline” used in previous adult formulations, to “tromethamine (Tris) buffer” and to exclude both sodium chloride and potassium chloride, claiming it “improved the stability profile of the vaccine.” A Pfizer spokesperson said, “This allows the mRNA to resist being degraded for a longer period of time before administration – meaning the pediatric vaccine can be stored [at] 2-8°C in commonly available refrigerators for up to 10 weeks.” If the half-life is going to take longer to degrade isn’t that going to increase the pathogenicity of the vaccine for children? 238. Why are there five doses in an adult vial and 10 doses in a children’s vial? Why didn’t the sponsors make it one dose per vial to ensure an even distribution of the vaccine. How can the TGA be sure that the person administering the vaccine is actually giving consistent concentrations?

21/11/2022

228. ACE receptors are not on all cells – does the TGA accept that the transfection process used by Pfizer makes the vaccine more pathogenic than the virus? The vaccine doesn’t target any cells, instead it targets all cells via transfection as shown in graphs on page 34 of the TGA Pfizer Non-Clinical report? 230. The non-clinical report noted one study that said 100% of people who had recovered from Covid had S protein specific CD4 t-cells and 70% had CD8 t-cells – if this is the case why is natural immunity being ignored for those who had Covid in favor of further boosters?

21/11/2022

1. Has the Office of Gene Technology performed any toxicity testing on the vaccines yet? If not, why not? Should the OGT be involved given the use of Gene Technology. 2. No spike protein was tested in the animal trials. Instead, luciferase was tested. Can the OGT please give its opinion on the quality assurance around testing conducted by Pfizer when it ignored including such a vital ingredient? 5. Can the OGT quantify how much the lifespan of mRNA will increase due to the addition 70 adenine nucleotides to the poly tail A? If not, why not? 6. What tests have been conducted to ensure that that proline insertion will actually keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? If the shape of the spike protein changes then does the OGT acknowledge that any antibodies generated by the vaccine will be ineffective because the spike protein generated by the vaccine will have a different shape to the virus spike protein? 7. Has the OGT conducted tests to determine the degradation and distribution of the lipids and spike protein. If not, why not? 8. The TGA non-clinical report on page 8 says that the spike protein can be created in the endoplasmic reticulum and can either be inserted into the membrane or secreted from the cell. What studies has the OGT undertaken to determine just how much spike protein is secreted from the bodies cells, which organs secrete the most proteins and how those proteins are cleared from the body? If not, why not? 9. When the spike protein is inserted into the membrane of the cell what studies has the OGT undertaken to determine the autoimmune response of the body in regards to disposing of cells that contain the spike protein? 10. Professor Murphy said in estimates that only the spike protein is removed from the cell membrane, and that the cell itself wasn’t destroyed. Is this correct? I note the TGA nonclinical reported the vaccine induced a CD8 response that destroy cells infected with viruses. 11. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – as page 109 FOI 2389-3? 12. Is the 3 cap structure in modified RNA the same as the 3 cap in virus spike protein? If not, what is the difference?

21/11/2022

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

21/11/2022

8. Has any safety testing been carried out in either humans or animals to determine the side effects of receiving 5 mRNA vaccines? 9. How is it that any deaths with a positive covid test is classed as a Covid death regardless of cause while any death after a vaccine isn’t classed as a vaccine death? Given the vaccine is still only provisionally approved shouldn’t all deaths with 6-8 weeks of receiving a vaccine be treated as a vaccine death until proven otherwise? 10. What are the criteria for a death to be linked to a vaccine? 11. Health advice says the benefits outweigh the risks on having 3 jabs as a 16+ year old person who is otherwise healthy? Where are the trials/numbers that support this statement and how can the TGA/ATAGI say this when longitudinal, carcinogenic, genotoxicity and numerous other tests were not carried out? 12. Severe adverse injuries were only counted by Pfizer in their Covid-19 trial up to 1 month after 2nd jab leading to the number of vaccine injuries being understated. “Limitations of our study include that Pfizer’s SAE table did not include SAEs occurring past 1 month after dose 2. This reporting threshold may have led to an undercounting of serious AE’ in the Pfizer study” – Why does the TGA believe this is acceptable Quality Assurance when Professor Skerritt said on the Today show in early 2021 that serious injuries could occur up to 8 weeks after the vaccine? 13. What is the adverse injury run rate that the TGA considers acceptable for a safe vaccine/drug? What are the benchmarks for proving it was safe? 14. I note that the 6-month data from the Pfizer trials 20 people died in the inoculation group while 15 died in the placebo group. 5,241 had related adverse events in the vaccination group against 1,311 in the placebo group – 300% more, 262 had severe adverse events (interferes significantly with normal function) in the vaccination group v 150 in the placebo group – 75% more and 127 had a serious adverse event (hospitalisation or visit to ER) v 116 in the placebo group which is 10% more – so where exactly does the TGA and other health authorities come up with the statement that the vaccine was actually proven to be safe and effective?

21/11/2022

15. The TGA/ Prof Skerritt has previously said the mRNA breaks down in minutes to hours yet they quote the International Coalition Medicines of Regulatory Agencies in FOI 3220 which says mRNA can break down in weeks after vaccination – so which is it and why is there such variation in understanding? 16. When does the mRNA actually break down – it’s been shown to hang around for 60 days and when does the spike protein break down – and when do the lipids break down- is there a definite end date – if not why not? 17. When do the spike proteins created by vaccine mRNA break down – studies have shown they remain in the body up to 15 months after the shot?

21/11/2022

If a Commonwealth employee is (i) coerced into having a flu vaccine and their job does not require it; (ii) that vaccine results in a permanent neurological injury, for example, multiple sclerosis; (iii) the Commonwealth employee is independently assessed as having that neurological injury being triggered by the vaccine, and; (iv) Comcare accepts the employee’s claim, Will Comcare pay for all ongoing physical treatments* prescribed by a GP & neurologist, for the rest of that employee’s life, (a) if those physical treatments only serve to maintain (but not improve) that employee’s health? (b) if those physical treatments only serve to slow down that employee’s decline in health? By ‘physical treatments’ I am referring to * exercise physiology by a physiotherapist 3 times a week to ensure appropriately tailored exercises and to keep neural pathways open. Appropriate tailoring of exercises is also necessary to prevent the employee from suffering a further injury that would be foreseeable if they were left to their own devices to make up their own program; * remedial massage 1-2 times a week; * gym membership, and; * any other medically prescribed treatments

21/11/2022

(a) Does Comcare ‘audit’ workplaces such as Parliament House, to ensure the Department of Parliamentary Services has appropriate disability accommodation strategies in place, where an employee has a disability or workplace injury such as multiple sclerosis? (b) If yes, then what criteria does Comcare use to undertake such an audit and satisfy itself that disability is appropriately accommodated? (c) Does Comcare ever conduct a survey of those with such a disability at Parliament House to inform its findings in relation to such an ‘audit’?

21/11/2022

Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is a health emergency? (a) Are employers authorised to deal with protected information as per S22 under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 if there is not a health emergency? (b) If the answer is no to either of the two prior questions, then how can asking for or recording the vaccination status of an employee be a fair and reasonable direction rather than a criminal offence? If the answer is yes, which act specifically empowers employers to deal with protection information under the AIR act?

21/11/2022

HAVE YOUR SAY...

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

DON'T BE SILENT. HAVE YOUR SAY!

I’m working on a range of issues currently in the Senate however I need your support so that my other Parliamentary colleagues know that these are issues that you feel strongly about.
Remember that we are stronger in numbers!

Visit People First Party
Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

GET MY Newsletter

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard

COMPLETE MY 30 SECOND SURVEY