GR: You haven’t done the testing to establish if there’s evidence or the evidence proves there’s no link?
Bureaucrat: In broad that statement can be correct. I don’t want to link that to anything specific.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Exactly. The ABS admitted in the excess death inquiry they don’t want to link excess deaths to anything specific.
You know like the Covid vaccines!
Community Affairs References Committee
13/06/2024
Excess Mortality
Senator RENNICK: One of the things I’ve heard constantly over the last three years is that there is no evidence to show that the vaccines were responsible for excess deaths. I have to say I agree with that statement in large part, for a number of reasons that we have just outlined; that is, that excess deaths haven’t been linked to vaccination status but they were linked to COVID status, so clearly it is going to be easier to link a death to COVID than to vaccines if you haven’t got the link there in the first place. As we go through the non-clinical report here, you find out that they never tested the distribution degradation of the S protein antigen, of the LNP lipids that were novel, of the DNA—they used a different manufacturing process so there is no testing on the DNA. Do you agree that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence?
Dr Gould: Can you say that again?
Senator RENNIC: You haven’t heard this term as a statistician?
Dr Gould: I have. I just want to be—
Senator RENNICK: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. So, if you haven’t tested for a lot of these things, of course there is no evidence, because you have not done the testing to establish if there is evidence, or the evidence proves that there is no link.
Dr Gould: In broad, that statement can be correct. I don’t want to link that to anything specific.
