TGA lies to cover up its negligence causing injury and death.
“TGA: Covid causes myocarditis at about seven times the rate of the vaccine.
Me: Have you got a study for that.
TGA: No, we do but I just don’t have it in front of me.
And
TGA: It’s fairly clear that vaccination against Covid is associated with a decrease in mortality.
Me: That didn’t happen in Australia.
TGA: It did happen.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••
At the last round of estimates it became clear that the TGA were colluding with Labor to filibuster their answers to cover up their negligence causing vaccine injuries.
To try and claim the Covid vaccine reduced mortality when deaths exploded in Australia is an insult to every deceased person and their families.
Likewise to claim the virus causes myocarditis at a rate 7 times higher than the jab knowing the spike protein was optimised to be toxic is also an insult to everyone who has suffered from myocarditis, pericarditis or POTs due to the jab.
But unlike like the TGA who use studies conducted by people who receive support from Pfizer (study referred to), real world data showed that deaths and cardiac presentations jumped before Covid was even in the community.
So how does this bloke justify his claims?
But that is what we are dealing with when it comes to bureaucrats and weak politicians in this country.
They will ignore injury and kill people in order to avoid responsibility and protect their jobs.
There is no greater evidence of the leadership crisis we have in this country than acknowledging the violence these people inflicted on the Australian people.
Committee on 5/06/2024
Community Affairs Legislation Committee
National Rural Health Commissioner
Senator RENNICK: I want to refer to the spike protein and in particular myocarditis. We hear now all the time that COVID caused myocarditis, presumably from the spike protein. Can you tell me why you approved the vaccine that had a spike-protein-encoded mRNA, knowing—you claim now you knew; I don’t recall you saying it at the time—that the spike protein causes myocarditis in the heart, that you’ve got codon optimisation, as per page 19 of your non-clinical report, and that the spike protein does cause issues with myocarditis? There’s 13 trillion strands of mRNA in the vaccine that can produce hundreds of proteins off each mRNA strand, on top of the codon optimisation, which was ‘optimised’ to increase the production of the spike protein. Why would you release a vaccine that makes more of the spike protein than the actual virus?
Dr Pengilley : Thank you for the question. I believe we’ve answered similar questions—at least, I have—in previous hearings. The purpose of the vaccine is to prevent COVID. From recollection, COVID causes myocarditis at about seven times the rate of the vaccine, so it’s not even a—
Senator RENNICK: Do you have a study for that? Can you quote that?
Dr Pengilley : I’m happy to provide it on notice.
Senator RENNICK: No, you can’t. Thanks.
Dr Pengilley : Yes, we do, but I just don’t have it in front of me. It’s not even an even race, if you’re trying to prevent myocarditis, between using the vaccine and not using it. But, of course, COVID has many other adverse events. It’s fairly clear that vaccination against COVID was associated with a decrease in mortality in the populations that received it.
Senator RENNICK: Well, that didn’t happen in Australia.
Dr Pengilley : It did happen in Australia. COVID also has a number of cardiovascular mortalities that run out to probably about two years. There are a number of reasons you prevent COVID, and this one adverse event we’re focusing on is not by any means the only one of them. As for why a spike protein was chosen, that’s the way the virus attaches to cells, and that’s the standard methodology by which vaccines are produced. That’s the state of the medical art.
Senator RENNICK: But the vaccine—
CHAIR: Senators, at this point, to facilitate your questions, we’re looking at two minutes each with each agency. So, Senator Rennick—
Senator RENNICK: Okay. Great filibustering. Well done, guys.
CHAIR: Thank you—
Unidentified speaker: That’s rude.
Senator URQUHART: That’s so disrespectful. You should withdraw that.
Senator RENNICK: No, it’s not. I asked a very straightforward question.
Senator URQUHART: Point of order.
CHAIR: Yes, Senator Urquhart.
Senator URQUHART: On a point of order, you should withdraw that.
Senator RENNICK: No, I’m not.
Senator URQUHART: That is outrageous. If you want the call, don’t be so rude.
CHAIR: Senator Rennick, when another senator’s asking for a withdrawal, it does assist the committee if you do withdraw.
Senator RENNICK: I asked a simple question about whether or not they ruled it out. They spoke for five minutes.
CHAIR: Senator Rennick, it would really assist me as chair if you could withdraw when another senator has asked you to please withdraw.
Senator RENNICK: It’s alright; I’m done.
