Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

Stay up to date...

JOIN MY MAILING LIST

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

231. The non-clinical report noted there were no studies on the protection of older animals – given it was older people who are susceptible why were older animals excluded? 232. The non-clinical report noted that monkeys were not a good animal model of severe Covid 19 in humans – if this is case why use monkeys in a trial for a disease, they are not a good model for? 233. The non-clinical report noted vaccine induced auto immune diseases were not studied in the non-clinical program and should be addressed by clinical data. If this is the case, why are humans being used as guinea pigs? 259. How can the TGA discount the increased number of supernumerary ribs in vaccinated pregnant rats as not being a safety signal? Shouldn’t more testing have taken place? 268. Why is the TGA refusing to provide information relating to “All Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Studies available to the TGA regarding the Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines including histology reports of gonads of vaccinated animals”

21/11/2022

229. As per the TGA non-clinical report – “there was very mild inflammation of lung tissues in both the control and vaccinated group 7 or 8 days after challenge with no difference in the inflammation score.” Given these results how can the TGA say the vaccine reduced lung infections from Covid? 234. The non-clinical report noted that the potential of vaccine to induce cytokine release was not adequately assessed in non-clinical trials. Why did the TGA approve the vaccine given such a risk was not properly understood? 235. On page 34 and page 35 pf the TGA non-clinical report the transfection and expression rates of the modified mRNA’s are much higher – isn’t that proof that the vaccine is much more pathogenic and infectious than the virus? 241. Why didn’t the TGA mention the use of methylpseudouridine in the non-clinical report? 245. In Section 2.4 on page 36 of TGA non-clinical report the structure of the spike protein is redacted – why is that?

21/11/2022

198. In a previous reply to a QON the TGA stated “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not routinely publish the number of adverse events reported as serious. This is because simple reporting of the number and type of adverse event reports, including the number of reports assigned by reporters to one of the seriousness criteria, is not a valid method for assessing vaccine safety”. Simple reporting has been used to report Covid cases and deaths which has then been used to mandate experimental gene technology that did not undergo rigorous testing – why are vaccines injuries and deaths held to a higher level of scrutiny and covid cases and deaths? 236. FOI 3727 reveals a number of deaths in people younger than 35 from the vaccine, including a 7, 9, 14 and 19 year old. Given these deaths why wasn’t the vaccine rollout paused? 240. Is the Covid vaccine history of all Coroner reported deaths – included for consideration in the Forensic Pathologist’s autopsy report – or all medical certificates of death?

21/11/2022

200. Who is responsible for acting on the safety signal in the DAEN database re Covid vaccines – the TGA or the sponsor? 214. I note that the Covid vaccines were provisionally approved subject to strict reporting conditions on safety and efficacy. Since provisional approval what has Pfizer reported to the TGA in regards to safety and efficacy since the rollout of the vaccine? 215. Can the safety reports provided by the Covid vaccine sponsors please be provided? 266. “The TGA’s vaccine safety monitoring system can rapidly detect, investigate and respond to any emerging safety issues identified for COVID-19 vaccines.” The TGA’s monitoring system is passive and therefore it can never “rapidly detect” safety issues! These pages are misleading the public are they not? https://www.tga.gov.au/products/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-vaccineapproval-process

21/11/2022

178. On average how many strands of mRNA are in 30 micrograms of mRNA? Given there are 5 doses in each vial how can the TGA be sure that each dose will contain the same amount of mRNA? 179. What is the margin of error administering 30 uml (.3mL) from a vial with 5 doses? 180. Why didn’t the TGA make Pfzier measure out the 30 microns evenly instead of leaving it to the person who administers the vaccine – the margin of error for such a small dose would be huge would it not? 181. Given the TGA measures mRNA by mass how does it know if they or the administrators of the vaccine are measuring mRNA and not solution?

21/11/2022

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

21/11/2022

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

21/11/2022

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

21/11/2022

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

21/11/2022

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

21/11/2022

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

21/11/2022

A number of private organisations in the media, medical professionals, and Pfizer have claimed the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine was safe and effective without outlining the risks or lack of quality assurance in regard to testing the vaccine. Genotoxicity, carcinogenic, and longitudinal testing are just some of the tests that didn’t occur. Other risks with missing information are outlined in the table below. There were only around 19,000 from the vaccinated group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated. One of these was Maddie De Garay, a 12-year-old girl, who ended up in a wheelchair being fed through a tube. 1. What laws are in place to ensure that all risks are outlined, as well as the rewards, when medical products are advertised or promoted – if laws do exist why weren’t they upheld in the case the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine? 2. What recourse do victims of the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine have against private organisations such as the media, pharmaceutical companies, and health professionals who constantly repeated the vaccine is safe and effective without highlighting the risks? 3. What steps can the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission take in regard to the promotion of medical products in order to prevent misleading and deceptive conduct in the future? (See table)

16/11/2022

1. Are individuals subjected to Covid vaccine mandates being counted in unemployment figures? If not, how are the number of people out work because of mandates being tracked? 2. Is the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) tracking deaths by vaccinated status – given it is being recorded on the Australian immunisation register it is possible to do? 3. If so, could the ABS please provide a line-by-line breakout of 2021 deaths by vaccinated versus unvaccinated deaths (personal details other than age can be excluded)? Can the detail include date of death and date of last vaccination? 4. Can the ABS provide a breakout of non-specific causes for 2021 deaths by item code? 5. Why isn’t the ABS comparing 2021 data to 2020 data rather than 2015-2019 given those years were pre-Covid conditions?

16/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Thanks. I thought you guys might have a better understanding, given that you are tech heads who sit there and crunch the numbers. That is good to know. I have one other question. In that breakout last year, there was a big jump in various causes. I did put in a request to the ABS if I could get a breakout of non-specific causes that weren’t listed line by line. Would it be possible to get a breakout of non-specific causes line by line in greater detail? Dr Gruen: We can take that on notice

10/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Did you track how many people are out of work because of the vaccine mandates? In your job numbers, are you tracking how many people are out of work because of vaccine mandates? Dr Gruen: We ask people a range of questions in the labour force survey. Again, I think it’s probably best to pass to Mr Jarvis. Mr Jarvis: We do track across a range of labour market measures people going in and out of employment. We ask questions that focus on a range of reasons, but we don’t ask questions that specifically go to that as a factor. Senator RENNICK: Do I ask you to do that? We have significant labour shortages in this country. I think it is important that people in the government find out at least how much willing but idle labour is sitting there because of those mandates. Is that something you can do? Dr Gruen: We can take that on notice.

10/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Maybe it’s a statement. Let’s move on to the next one. The other night I asked you about blood tests and donating blood after three days. You said there’s no reason why the spike protein would be in the actual blood. Firstly, in the actual non-clinical evaluation report from the TGA it says there is no actual testing of the spike protein in the clinic itself. To say that you wouldn’t know that it’s in the blood – you wouldn’t actually know that because, as it says here, there is no distribution and degradation data on the S-antigen encoding mRNA, that is, the spike protein. The same question to you. The other night you said, ‘It wouldn’t be in the blood.’ My question to you is: how would you know that if there is never any testing done on the spike protein, firstly? A study published in May 2021 documented for the first time that S-proteins were found in 11 of the 13 subjects as early as one day after the injection of, in this case, the Moderna vaccine. Prof. Murphy: Where? Senator RENNICK: In the blood. They found the spike protein in the blood. Studies have found spike proteins in the blood as early as one day after the actual vaccine. Prof. Murphy: All I can say is that I’m happy to take that issue on notice again and get Professor Skerritt to respond on the full dataset that we have around this issue. I’ve not seen any evidence that spike proteins are detected three days after vaccines in any studies that I’ve seen. But I’m not across all of the literature. If it’s a legitimate question I will get the TGA to address it. Senator RENNICK: You wouldn’t find that evidence because there were no studies done, according to this TGA report. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. They are two separate things. […] Prof. Murphy: I certainly didn’t say that, but Professor Skerritt may have. We’ve let him go now. Again, we’ll take it on notice to come back to you on that issue. I have really strong confidence in our regulatory process. We now have real-world evidence of many billions of doses of these vaccines. We believe that they are incredibly effective and incredibly safe. Professor Skerritt said we only had I think 14 confirmed deaths associated with vaccines, and many of them were with AstraZeneca. I really do have great faith in our regulatory system.

10/11/2022

1. Senator RENNICK: My question is, again, with regard to the size of the crowd that came to Canberra on 12 February. That area was measured out at 60,000 square metres. You’ve previously said that the crowd size was about 10,000 people, which works out at about one person per every six square metres, which is about two metres by two metres. I was there and can tell you that was not the case. Can I get access to the software where you calculated that? I think last time you said you used some software or you used some method. I’d like to see the methodology you used to calculate the size of that crowd if that’s alright please. Mr Kershaw: I think what we can do is come back to you as to how we made that assessment. 2. Senator RENNICK: I appreciate that. Can I also get access to any correspondence that you had with other government agencies about the size of that crowd?

08/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Okay, then I’ll ask the professors. There was no genotoxicity study done for the rollout of the vaccine. The vaccine has been rolled out now for up to 18 or 20 months. Has any genotoxicity study been performed on the vaccine given that there are a number of modifications to the spike protein that weren’t in the initial virus? Prof. Murphy: I’ll just see if Ms Duffy from the TGA is online, and whether TGA officials can provide any information about that. They are obviously across all of the material that’s submitted as part of the vaccine evaluation. Ms Duffy: I’m sorry, I don’t have that information, but I’m happy to take it on notice and bring it back on Thursday if that suits you. Senator RENNICK: That’s fine. Initially, when you looked at the assessment it said there were no genotoxicity studies done at all, or carcinogenic or longevity studies. I’m just curious if you’ve done any since? Ms Duffy: We’ll go back and be able to provide that information on Thursday.

08/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: I don’t have those particular New South Wales health numbers in front of me, but vaccinated 1, 2, 3, 4 groups all have higher numbers of hospital transmission and ICU admission. Prof. Kelly: We know, absolutely, without hesitation, that, with fully vaccinated people, just two doses is enough to give at least a 30-times less chance of being hospitalised—in Australia; that’s Australian data. Senator RENNICK: Based on what, because the non-clinical report said – Senator Gallagher: Based on vaccination data. Prof. Kelly: Based on the truth and facts. Senator RENNICK: Be more specific than that. Actually quote the data source, please. Prof. Kelly: That’s the data source from the national data that we have, in the Commonwealth, which is provided to us by the states and territories. Senator RENNICK: Can you provide that to me? I haven’t seen the state data outside New South Wales. Prof. Kelly: I’m very happy to provide that to you on notice.

08/11/2022

43. When filling out an adverse event report there is an option to indicate if the adverse event led to 1) Death 2) A life threating event, 3) admission to hospital, 4) a disability or incapacitation, 5) a congenital anomaly or 6) birth defect or 7) another medically important condition. Can I get the total of these categories to date by age and injury type and the cut-off date at which the numbers are given please?44. In future can the totals of the categories 1) Death 2) A life threating event, 3) admission to hospital, 4) a disability or incapacitation, 5) a congenital anomaly or 6) birth defect or 7) another medically important condition be provided in the weekly reports by age group and event type?

24/02/2022

231. The non-clinical report noted there were no studies on the protection of older animals – given it was older people who are susceptible why were older animals excluded? 232. The non-clinical report noted that monkeys were not a good animal model of severe Covid 19 in humans – if this is case why use monkeys in a trial for a disease, they are not a good model for? 233. The non-clinical report noted vaccine induced auto immune diseases were not studied in the non-clinical program and should be addressed by clinical data. If this is the case, why are humans being used as guinea pigs? 259. How can the TGA discount the increased number of supernumerary ribs in vaccinated pregnant rats as not being a safety signal? Shouldn’t more testing have taken place? 268. Why is the TGA refusing to provide information relating to “All Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Studies available to the TGA regarding the Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines including histology reports of gonads of vaccinated animals”

21/11/2022

229. As per the TGA non-clinical report – “there was very mild inflammation of lung tissues in both the control and vaccinated group 7 or 8 days after challenge with no difference in the inflammation score.” Given these results how can the TGA say the vaccine reduced lung infections from Covid? 234. The non-clinical report noted that the potential of vaccine to induce cytokine release was not adequately assessed in non-clinical trials. Why did the TGA approve the vaccine given such a risk was not properly understood? 235. On page 34 and page 35 pf the TGA non-clinical report the transfection and expression rates of the modified mRNA’s are much higher – isn’t that proof that the vaccine is much more pathogenic and infectious than the virus? 241. Why didn’t the TGA mention the use of methylpseudouridine in the non-clinical report? 245. In Section 2.4 on page 36 of TGA non-clinical report the structure of the spike protein is redacted – why is that?

21/11/2022

198. In a previous reply to a QON the TGA stated “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not routinely publish the number of adverse events reported as serious. This is because simple reporting of the number and type of adverse event reports, including the number of reports assigned by reporters to one of the seriousness criteria, is not a valid method for assessing vaccine safety”. Simple reporting has been used to report Covid cases and deaths which has then been used to mandate experimental gene technology that did not undergo rigorous testing – why are vaccines injuries and deaths held to a higher level of scrutiny and covid cases and deaths? 236. FOI 3727 reveals a number of deaths in people younger than 35 from the vaccine, including a 7, 9, 14 and 19 year old. Given these deaths why wasn’t the vaccine rollout paused? 240. Is the Covid vaccine history of all Coroner reported deaths – included for consideration in the Forensic Pathologist’s autopsy report – or all medical certificates of death?

21/11/2022

200. Who is responsible for acting on the safety signal in the DAEN database re Covid vaccines – the TGA or the sponsor? 214. I note that the Covid vaccines were provisionally approved subject to strict reporting conditions on safety and efficacy. Since provisional approval what has Pfizer reported to the TGA in regards to safety and efficacy since the rollout of the vaccine? 215. Can the safety reports provided by the Covid vaccine sponsors please be provided? 266. “The TGA’s vaccine safety monitoring system can rapidly detect, investigate and respond to any emerging safety issues identified for COVID-19 vaccines.” The TGA’s monitoring system is passive and therefore it can never “rapidly detect” safety issues! These pages are misleading the public are they not? https://www.tga.gov.au/products/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-vaccineapproval-process

21/11/2022

178. On average how many strands of mRNA are in 30 micrograms of mRNA? Given there are 5 doses in each vial how can the TGA be sure that each dose will contain the same amount of mRNA? 179. What is the margin of error administering 30 uml (.3mL) from a vial with 5 doses? 180. Why didn’t the TGA make Pfzier measure out the 30 microns evenly instead of leaving it to the person who administers the vaccine – the margin of error for such a small dose would be huge would it not? 181. Given the TGA measures mRNA by mass how does it know if they or the administrators of the vaccine are measuring mRNA and not solution?

21/11/2022

186. Regarding Ivermectin, is this the first time in Australian history that the Federal Government has instructed the withdrawal of a medicine in the context of a public health emergency? 187. What evidence was there that taking Ivermectin could be a risk to the community either directly, or indirectly by discouraging vaccination. Given vaccination doesn’t stop transmission how was taking Ivermectin a threat to others? 188. What evidence was considered by the committee when recommending that Ivermectin was a risk to individual patient health. Did the Committee and Minister review any evidence of death or injury through inappropriate use of Ivermectin? I note Dr Skerritt stated 12mg was an unsafe dose in a previous conversation yet the sponsors of the drug have claimed that one off does of 120mg and 30,60 and 90mg doses on day 1, day 4 and day 7 are safe.

21/11/2022

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

21/11/2022

102. Regarding vaccine injury claims how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? 103. Regarding reported deaths from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine? 104. Regarding reported injuries from the vaccine how can the TGA override specialists or health professionals when they have examined the patient and the TGA hasn’t? Especially when the specialists or health professional has ticked the “suspected” box that indicates they believe the death was caused by the vaccine?

21/11/2022

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

21/11/2022

174. Will the Health department run a study to determine if Covid antibodies are higher in the vaccinated or unvaccinated? If not, why not – isn’t this critical to determine the long term of effects of multiple Covid vaccines on the immune system to find out if repeated vaccine shots lower the body’s immune defences? 201. Has the TGA or the sponsor tested the modifications to the mRNA in the vaccine spike protein to ensure that it is capable of being broken down by the body’s immune system? If so, can studies please be provided and the number of days taken to break down the spike protein be stated? 269. How much confidence is there that the proline insertions keep the spike protein in its prefusion shape? What studies have been completed that demonstrate this? Does the TGA accept that if the spike is not replicated in its prefusion shape then the immune system will recognise it as a different pathogen to the virus spike protein?

21/11/2022

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

21/11/2022

A number of private organisations in the media, medical professionals, and Pfizer have claimed the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine was safe and effective without outlining the risks or lack of quality assurance in regard to testing the vaccine. Genotoxicity, carcinogenic, and longitudinal testing are just some of the tests that didn’t occur. Other risks with missing information are outlined in the table below. There were only around 19,000 from the vaccinated group evaluated when over 21,000 were vaccinated. One of these was Maddie De Garay, a 12-year-old girl, who ended up in a wheelchair being fed through a tube. 1. What laws are in place to ensure that all risks are outlined, as well as the rewards, when medical products are advertised or promoted – if laws do exist why weren’t they upheld in the case the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine? 2. What recourse do victims of the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccine have against private organisations such as the media, pharmaceutical companies, and health professionals who constantly repeated the vaccine is safe and effective without highlighting the risks? 3. What steps can the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission take in regard to the promotion of medical products in order to prevent misleading and deceptive conduct in the future? (See table)

16/11/2022

1. Are individuals subjected to Covid vaccine mandates being counted in unemployment figures? If not, how are the number of people out work because of mandates being tracked? 2. Is the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) tracking deaths by vaccinated status – given it is being recorded on the Australian immunisation register it is possible to do? 3. If so, could the ABS please provide a line-by-line breakout of 2021 deaths by vaccinated versus unvaccinated deaths (personal details other than age can be excluded)? Can the detail include date of death and date of last vaccination? 4. Can the ABS provide a breakout of non-specific causes for 2021 deaths by item code? 5. Why isn’t the ABS comparing 2021 data to 2020 data rather than 2015-2019 given those years were pre-Covid conditions?

16/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Thanks. I thought you guys might have a better understanding, given that you are tech heads who sit there and crunch the numbers. That is good to know. I have one other question. In that breakout last year, there was a big jump in various causes. I did put in a request to the ABS if I could get a breakout of non-specific causes that weren’t listed line by line. Would it be possible to get a breakout of non-specific causes line by line in greater detail? Dr Gruen: We can take that on notice

10/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Did you track how many people are out of work because of the vaccine mandates? In your job numbers, are you tracking how many people are out of work because of vaccine mandates? Dr Gruen: We ask people a range of questions in the labour force survey. Again, I think it’s probably best to pass to Mr Jarvis. Mr Jarvis: We do track across a range of labour market measures people going in and out of employment. We ask questions that focus on a range of reasons, but we don’t ask questions that specifically go to that as a factor. Senator RENNICK: Do I ask you to do that? We have significant labour shortages in this country. I think it is important that people in the government find out at least how much willing but idle labour is sitting there because of those mandates. Is that something you can do? Dr Gruen: We can take that on notice.

10/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Maybe it’s a statement. Let’s move on to the next one. The other night I asked you about blood tests and donating blood after three days. You said there’s no reason why the spike protein would be in the actual blood. Firstly, in the actual non-clinical evaluation report from the TGA it says there is no actual testing of the spike protein in the clinic itself. To say that you wouldn’t know that it’s in the blood – you wouldn’t actually know that because, as it says here, there is no distribution and degradation data on the S-antigen encoding mRNA, that is, the spike protein. The same question to you. The other night you said, ‘It wouldn’t be in the blood.’ My question to you is: how would you know that if there is never any testing done on the spike protein, firstly? A study published in May 2021 documented for the first time that S-proteins were found in 11 of the 13 subjects as early as one day after the injection of, in this case, the Moderna vaccine. Prof. Murphy: Where? Senator RENNICK: In the blood. They found the spike protein in the blood. Studies have found spike proteins in the blood as early as one day after the actual vaccine. Prof. Murphy: All I can say is that I’m happy to take that issue on notice again and get Professor Skerritt to respond on the full dataset that we have around this issue. I’ve not seen any evidence that spike proteins are detected three days after vaccines in any studies that I’ve seen. But I’m not across all of the literature. If it’s a legitimate question I will get the TGA to address it. Senator RENNICK: You wouldn’t find that evidence because there were no studies done, according to this TGA report. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. They are two separate things. […] Prof. Murphy: I certainly didn’t say that, but Professor Skerritt may have. We’ve let him go now. Again, we’ll take it on notice to come back to you on that issue. I have really strong confidence in our regulatory process. We now have real-world evidence of many billions of doses of these vaccines. We believe that they are incredibly effective and incredibly safe. Professor Skerritt said we only had I think 14 confirmed deaths associated with vaccines, and many of them were with AstraZeneca. I really do have great faith in our regulatory system.

10/11/2022

1. Senator RENNICK: My question is, again, with regard to the size of the crowd that came to Canberra on 12 February. That area was measured out at 60,000 square metres. You’ve previously said that the crowd size was about 10,000 people, which works out at about one person per every six square metres, which is about two metres by two metres. I was there and can tell you that was not the case. Can I get access to the software where you calculated that? I think last time you said you used some software or you used some method. I’d like to see the methodology you used to calculate the size of that crowd if that’s alright please. Mr Kershaw: I think what we can do is come back to you as to how we made that assessment. 2. Senator RENNICK: I appreciate that. Can I also get access to any correspondence that you had with other government agencies about the size of that crowd?

08/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: Okay, then I’ll ask the professors. There was no genotoxicity study done for the rollout of the vaccine. The vaccine has been rolled out now for up to 18 or 20 months. Has any genotoxicity study been performed on the vaccine given that there are a number of modifications to the spike protein that weren’t in the initial virus? Prof. Murphy: I’ll just see if Ms Duffy from the TGA is online, and whether TGA officials can provide any information about that. They are obviously across all of the material that’s submitted as part of the vaccine evaluation. Ms Duffy: I’m sorry, I don’t have that information, but I’m happy to take it on notice and bring it back on Thursday if that suits you. Senator RENNICK: That’s fine. Initially, when you looked at the assessment it said there were no genotoxicity studies done at all, or carcinogenic or longevity studies. I’m just curious if you’ve done any since? Ms Duffy: We’ll go back and be able to provide that information on Thursday.

08/11/2022

Senator RENNICK: I don’t have those particular New South Wales health numbers in front of me, but vaccinated 1, 2, 3, 4 groups all have higher numbers of hospital transmission and ICU admission. Prof. Kelly: We know, absolutely, without hesitation, that, with fully vaccinated people, just two doses is enough to give at least a 30-times less chance of being hospitalised—in Australia; that’s Australian data. Senator RENNICK: Based on what, because the non-clinical report said – Senator Gallagher: Based on vaccination data. Prof. Kelly: Based on the truth and facts. Senator RENNICK: Be more specific than that. Actually quote the data source, please. Prof. Kelly: That’s the data source from the national data that we have, in the Commonwealth, which is provided to us by the states and territories. Senator RENNICK: Can you provide that to me? I haven’t seen the state data outside New South Wales. Prof. Kelly: I’m very happy to provide that to you on notice.

08/11/2022

43. When filling out an adverse event report there is an option to indicate if the adverse event led to 1) Death 2) A life threating event, 3) admission to hospital, 4) a disability or incapacitation, 5) a congenital anomaly or 6) birth defect or 7) another medically important condition. Can I get the total of these categories to date by age and injury type and the cut-off date at which the numbers are given please?44. In future can the totals of the categories 1) Death 2) A life threating event, 3) admission to hospital, 4) a disability or incapacitation, 5) a congenital anomaly or 6) birth defect or 7) another medically important condition be provided in the weekly reports by age group and event type?

24/02/2022

HAVE YOUR SAY...

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

DON'T BE SILENT. HAVE YOUR SAY!

I’m working on a range of issues currently in the Senate however I need your support so that my other Parliamentary colleagues know that these are issues that you feel strongly about.
Remember that we are stronger in numbers!

Visit People First Party
Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter Tiktok

GET MY Newsletter

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard

COMPLETE MY 30 SECOND SURVEY