Stay up to date...

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Questions are currently being updated, please check back soon for previous questions.

89. In the TGA non-clinical report it states “the S protein is synthesised and processed within the ER for surface expression or secretion.” Why is the vaccine stimulating the human body to export the spike protein from the cell – shouldn’t it be sterilising the virus rather than reproducing it? 90. What impact does the secretion of spike proteins have on the endothelium and other sensitive body organs? 91. Has the TGA done any research on the secretion of proteins from the cell as a result of the vaccine? If not, why not? 92. What evidence does the TGA have to prove that proteins secreted from the cells don’t cause clots and damage to body organs? 93. How does the TGA know that the ribosome translates the mRNA code 100% accurately and no mutations occur if no mutagenic studies have been done? 94. Has the TGA done any distribution and degradation studies to determine the potential toxicity of the secreted spike protein. If not, why not?

63. Is it possible that the extreme length of the poly-A tail is contributing to longevity. The Roltgen cell paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422000769) shows mRNA at 60 days post injection still producing spike antigen. Won’t this lead to t-cell exhaustion, as well as risking p53-dependent carcinogenesis risk? Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination (cell.com) 64. Doesn’t the pathway used by the mRNA vaccine to instruct the body cell’s to produce a toxic spike protein increase the risk of harm to the body? Isn’t the name of the game to kill the pathogen rather than reproduce it on an unknown time basis? 65. Does the vaccine induce an autoimmune response – either by T-cells attaching your own cells or white blood cells attacking protein (whatever its form) created by the vaccine and exported from the cell?

66. Studies carried out on the lipid in rat trials showed it entered most body organs. Given that lipid concentrations were still increasing in most body organs, most notably the ovaries where it doubled from day 1 to day 2, why did the TGA not request more testing from Pfizer to determine just how long the lipids stay in the body before approving their vaccine? 67. How can the TGA guarantee that lipids that have entered body organs won’t damage those organs without longitudinal testing? 68. Why were biodistribution studies stopped after 9 days when it has been shown that mRNA, Lipids and spike proteins had been found in the body up to 60 days after the second vaccination? How can the TGA say with any confidence what the lifespan of the spike protein if they never tested it? Why didn’t the sponsor continue the trials given concentrations were increasing? 69. Why were no biodistribution studies performed with the spike protein? 70. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the lipids stay in the body. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 75. Why is the lipid travelling around the body in increasing concentrations when many Health professionals said it would stay at the injection site?

155. There are almost 20,000 serious injuries to date out of 20 million recipients in a 12- month period since the rollout began. This is an injury rate of 1 in 1000 people who have received the vaccine. This higher than the 1 in 3000 Prof Skerrit mentioned in regard to multi-inflammatory disease and also the few in a million side effects he quoted with John Laws. Given the rate of serious injury from the Covid-19 vaccine shouldn’t they be withdrawn? 156. What is the source of Prof Skerritt’s claim that Covid-19 causes multi-inflammatory disease in 1 in 3000 children? Can the source please be provided? 192. According to Moderna serious adverse events were recorded at one in 200 for six months to five years yet the TGA still approved this jab. Why did they do that knowing that the risk of the jab was 15 times greater than multi-inflammatory disease? I note factcheckers are claiming some of the trial participants already had underlying issues and that only one was an adverse event. This is still one in 1760 which is higher than one in 3000. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2209367

161. “Pfizer has asked a U.S. court to throw out a lawsuit from a whistle-blower who revealed problems at sites that tested Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer stated that the regulations don’t apply to its vaccine contract with the U.S. Department of Defence because the agreement gives contract holders the ability to skirt many rules and laws that typically apply to contracts.” Pfizer Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit From COVID-19 Vaccine Trial, Citing ‘Prototype’ Agreement (theepochtimes.com) – Has Australia signed a Covid-19 contract with Pfizer that has similar conditions? 162. Why are you penalising Australians $10,000 of dollars for importing Ivermectin worth $40 but doing nothing about Pfizer not living up to its promise about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine? 165. Can the TGA provide all correspondence with Pfizer regarding the Covid vaccine in regards to purchase agreements, testing and safety concerns? 183. Is the vaccine injury scheme going to be updated to include additional side effects that have been reported to the TGA by Health Professionals rather than Pfizer who have a conflict of interest in reporting side effects from their own drugs? 191. The normal default for contracts is to reserve a “right” to buy. Are these the terms the Pfizer Covid vaccine contract was based on, or do have an “obligation” to buy the Covid vaccines regardless of performance? If so, why did the health department deviate from the normal procedure for a contract that covers Australia’s needs many times over, for a period where all would already be vaccinated (2022 and 2023). 262. The contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need. Is this true? If so, then why is Pfizer hiding from independent scrutiny?

71. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the body produces the Spike protein. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 72. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the spike protein or any other related prions, mutations stay in the body and by body organ type. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 73. Do expressed spike proteins stay in the cell membrane or are they secreted via exosomes? 74. The ribosomes on the endoplasmic reticulum produce protein for export while ribosome in the cytoplasm produce proteins for use inside the cell. Given the TGA non-clinical report says the spike protein is produced via the endoplasmic reticulum then isn’t evidence that spike proteins will be exported from the cell and potentially re-enter the circulatory system? 76. Which part of the mRNA code tells the mRNA to attach to the Endoplasmic Reticulum? 77. What evidence does the TGA have that the spike protein doesn’t go into the nucleus – the delivery of the spike protein was never tested. There were no studies carried out so how would the TGA know with 100% certainty the mRNA or the spike protein doesn’t enter the nucleus? 78. Is there any evidence that the spike protein does not inhibit the P53 gene? Were studies carried out to prove this? 79. “Another study revealed that extracellular vesicles decorated with S-proteins persist up to 4 months after vaccination… This raises the possibility that LNP–mRNA remain in circulation for extended periods of time, retaining their ability to induce S-protein expression….”. Does the TGA refute this study? www.mdpi.com/2227- 9059/10/7/1538/htm 87. Have studies been conducted by the TGA to determine if the spike protein interferes with oocytes?

80. In the prior set of estimates Prof Skerrit said that the lipids used in the vaccine are like the lipids you have in a steak for breakfast. This is not the case – as per Pfizers own website they are special ionised lipids designed to cross the cell membrane. Will Prof Skerritt withdraw his prior remark? 81. Lipids are hydrophobic not hydrophilic – by cationising them you have completely changed their characteristics from inactive to active -why did Prof Skerritt mislead the senate when he said the lipids were like the lipids you find in sausages/steak for breakfast? 82. Given these lipids are ionised and therefore an active ingredient what studies have been undertaken to ensure they were not harmful to the human body? 83. What studies were undertaken to ensure that the cationic lipids don’t create reactive oxygen species which can cause irreversible damage to DNA? 84. If the ionic lipids can enter any cells via electroporation or transfection then aren’t they more infectious than the virus which can only enter cells that contain ACE and TMPRRS enzymes that facilitate the virus entering the cell? 85. Can the lipids enter both white and red blood cells? I note that lipids entered both the spleen and bone marrow in the rat studies? 86. Given the lipids are taken up by the ovaries what guarantees can the TGA give that eggs are not being damaged. Obstetricians are reporting that they are seeing clusters of low Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in young women 95. The bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes are responsible for producing white blood cells and regulating the while blood cells in the blood and the lymphatic system. Given that lipids can enter these organs and induce an autoimmune response against the cells in these body organs isn’t there a serious risk that the vaccine can induce autoimmune diseases?

163. Hasn’t Pfizer and Co broken the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by failing to report all the adverse events from their trials and post marketing surveillance (refer to patient records)? Under paragraph 28(5)(ca) of the Act, you MUST retain records pertaining to the reporting requirements and safety for your medicine. (page 29 of 44) 164. What is the legislation that details the TGAs responsibilities in regard to post market safety surveillance data? Why hasn’t the TGA sought to allay the publics fear over data that shows an alarming number of adverse events and poor quality assurance practices? 202. Does the TGA do post marketing surveillance at all over and above that of the sponsor? If not, why not? What is the point of having an independent regulator if it doesn’t do independent safety testing?

166. The AusVax safety data showed over 5 million people reported side effects 3 days after taking the Covid-19 vaccine and around 1 in 100 had to see a doctor or go to emergency just 3 days after taking a vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high? 167. The AusVax safety data says 8% reported missing work, study or routine duties after dose 1 of the Covid vaccine, 21% after dose 2 of the Covid vaccine and 15% after dose 3 of the Covid vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high?

88. FOI 2565 requested “Histopathology/microscopic evaluation of gonads (ovaries/testes) of vaccinated animals in relation to Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines”. This application has been rejected three times, and was rejected finally by the internal reviewers on 27 Sep 2021. Why is the TGA withholding reports of ovarian and testicular effects of an investigational (provisionally registered) vaccine. Particularly in the context of vaccine mandates being imposed upon men and women of reproductive age in various occupational sectors, and now on children and teens with their reproductive years ahead of them?

62. Why is Ivermectin banned as a Covid treatment when in the last year it has had a fraction (5) adverse event reports v over 100 adverse event reports from other early treatments such as remdesivir and dexamethasone for example? 63. Why was Remdesivir approved on the basis on a small number of trials with a small sample size? 64. Given the large number of people who have taken Ivermectin in the last six months in treating Covid and the low rate of adverse events in comparison with the Vaccines how can the TGA justify their decision to ban doctors prescribing Ivermectin? 65. Are doctors using Ivermectin in Australian hospitals to treat patients with late stage Covid? 66. If so why can’t Ivermectin be used as an early treatment? 116. Why is the TGA relying on real world data for children, spanning a few months but ignoring real world data on ivermectin that spans over 30 years. 117. According to the TGA search facility there has only been 5 reports of Adverse events against Ivermectin in the last 13 months. Given there has been over 108,000 adverse events against the Covid vaccines why is the TGA claiming that Ivermectin is not safe, when there has been so many more reported events from the Covid vaccines?

163. Given the Covid-19 vaccines are still provisional and the reporting rate is only 2.2 out of 1000 inoculations why isn’t the TGA following up every person to ensure there are no adverse events that are not being reported? 164. Can the TGA define rare in drug development terms? i.e. is a vaccine considered safe if there is one adverse event for every million doses – what are the benchmark rates? 187. Where the TGA declines to acknowledge an adverse event, does the TGA follow up with those people to say why it isn’t an adverse event? 188. A cardiologist has been told by Queensland Health he is unable to lodge adverse events relating to myocarditis- why is that – if a cardiologist can’t lodge myocarditis adverse events who can? 224. In terms of giving the provider number when completing an adverse event notification to the TGA, how does an individual get this if they got it at bunnings or the provider doesn’t want to give it or is longer contactable? 225. Why does the TGA only make adverse event reports available via PDF rather than a csv file? 226. Is the TGA going to provide more reporting optionality with its adverse event data? 227. Can the TGA provide me with read only access to the adverse event database? 228. Does the TGA have its database and database management processes audited by an independent third party? If not why not?

1. In regard to Covid vaccines, how many claims for deaths and injuries have been paid out on, how many outstanding claims are there for deaths and injuries and how many claims re deaths and injuries have been dismissed? 2. Is a non-disclosure agreement a condition of any of these payouts? 3. Is the Indemnity scheme going to be widened given there are more adverse events than recognised by Pfizer in their trials and in light of the fact that Pfizer has is trying to withhold data relating to the trials for up to 55 years? 193. What the conditions around vaccine indemnities given to pharmaceutical companies? If the companies have withheld data that is material to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine do the companies still receive indemnity?

I note that on page 23 and 24 of the Pfizer post marketing surveillance data that the event latency was reported as <24 hours to 41 days with a median of 2 days for stroke, and for neurological events on page 21 range <24 hours to 48 days median 1 day, and for cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction and cardiac failure range a latency range of <24 hours to 21 days and median <24 hours. Because Pfizer failed to detect these vaccine injuries, victims have been denied proper medical attention and had their injuries ignored. Given this data will John Skerritt now admit the Pfizer vaccine can cause strokes and apologise to those who have suffered strokes and other adverse events?

47. Will the TGA ask for the all the data from the Pfizer trial including the data the Pfizer is trying to prevent from releasing to the public for a period of up to 55 years? 48. Has the TGA ask Pfizer for an explanation of why the company does not want to release data for up to 55 years? 49. If the data that Pfizer does not want to release is shown to be materially different in terms of safety and efficacy will the TGA sue Pfizer for damages or does the Pfizer indemnity extend to fraud and or non-disclosure? 50. On what basis does John Skerritt say that the data relating to the vaccine trials is thorough when not all data has been released, individual data wasn’t looked at and several areas including carcinogenic risks, immunocompromised patients, pregnant women, breast feeding women, reactions to other drugs and longitudinal studies weren’t completed? 51. How can the TGA say the Pfizer trial was relevant to the vulnerable population when only 4% of the trial group was over 75 when over 75% of people over 75 were hospitalised or died from Covid? 52. Could the TGA provide measurements of clinical outcomes in the initial Pfizer trial such as hospitalisations and deaths and subclinical outcomes such as inflammation and clotting?

4. Why is the Health Department allowing AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) to censor Doctors and nurses on giving their views on the Covid vaccine? I have spoken to over 100 medical staff who are afraid of being suspended or have been suspended for giving their views on the dangers of the vaccine? 5. If AHPRA is not a government aligned body, then why isn’t the government protecting the right of medical staff to express their view freely without the threat of suspension? 6. I note neither the Chair or CEO of AHPRA are qualified doctors or nurses. Who gives AHPRA the authority to suspend doctors or nurses at a time there is a shortage of them in Australian hospitals for expressing their professional views based on their observations?

89. In the TGA non-clinical report it states “the S protein is synthesised and processed within the ER for surface expression or secretion.” Why is the vaccine stimulating the human body to export the spike protein from the cell – shouldn’t it be sterilising the virus rather than reproducing it? 90. What impact does the secretion of spike proteins have on the endothelium and other sensitive body organs? 91. Has the TGA done any research on the secretion of proteins from the cell as a result of the vaccine? If not, why not? 92. What evidence does the TGA have to prove that proteins secreted from the cells don’t cause clots and damage to body organs? 93. How does the TGA know that the ribosome translates the mRNA code 100% accurately and no mutations occur if no mutagenic studies have been done? 94. Has the TGA done any distribution and degradation studies to determine the potential toxicity of the secreted spike protein. If not, why not?

63. Is it possible that the extreme length of the poly-A tail is contributing to longevity. The Roltgen cell paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422000769) shows mRNA at 60 days post injection still producing spike antigen. Won’t this lead to t-cell exhaustion, as well as risking p53-dependent carcinogenesis risk? Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination (cell.com) 64. Doesn’t the pathway used by the mRNA vaccine to instruct the body cell’s to produce a toxic spike protein increase the risk of harm to the body? Isn’t the name of the game to kill the pathogen rather than reproduce it on an unknown time basis? 65. Does the vaccine induce an autoimmune response – either by T-cells attaching your own cells or white blood cells attacking protein (whatever its form) created by the vaccine and exported from the cell?

66. Studies carried out on the lipid in rat trials showed it entered most body organs. Given that lipid concentrations were still increasing in most body organs, most notably the ovaries where it doubled from day 1 to day 2, why did the TGA not request more testing from Pfizer to determine just how long the lipids stay in the body before approving their vaccine? 67. How can the TGA guarantee that lipids that have entered body organs won’t damage those organs without longitudinal testing? 68. Why were biodistribution studies stopped after 9 days when it has been shown that mRNA, Lipids and spike proteins had been found in the body up to 60 days after the second vaccination? How can the TGA say with any confidence what the lifespan of the spike protein if they never tested it? Why didn’t the sponsor continue the trials given concentrations were increasing? 69. Why were no biodistribution studies performed with the spike protein? 70. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the lipids stay in the body. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 75. Why is the lipid travelling around the body in increasing concentrations when many Health professionals said it would stay at the injection site?

155. There are almost 20,000 serious injuries to date out of 20 million recipients in a 12- month period since the rollout began. This is an injury rate of 1 in 1000 people who have received the vaccine. This higher than the 1 in 3000 Prof Skerrit mentioned in regard to multi-inflammatory disease and also the few in a million side effects he quoted with John Laws. Given the rate of serious injury from the Covid-19 vaccine shouldn’t they be withdrawn? 156. What is the source of Prof Skerritt’s claim that Covid-19 causes multi-inflammatory disease in 1 in 3000 children? Can the source please be provided? 192. According to Moderna serious adverse events were recorded at one in 200 for six months to five years yet the TGA still approved this jab. Why did they do that knowing that the risk of the jab was 15 times greater than multi-inflammatory disease? I note factcheckers are claiming some of the trial participants already had underlying issues and that only one was an adverse event. This is still one in 1760 which is higher than one in 3000. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2209367

161. “Pfizer has asked a U.S. court to throw out a lawsuit from a whistle-blower who revealed problems at sites that tested Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer stated that the regulations don’t apply to its vaccine contract with the U.S. Department of Defence because the agreement gives contract holders the ability to skirt many rules and laws that typically apply to contracts.” Pfizer Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit From COVID-19 Vaccine Trial, Citing ‘Prototype’ Agreement (theepochtimes.com) – Has Australia signed a Covid-19 contract with Pfizer that has similar conditions? 162. Why are you penalising Australians $10,000 of dollars for importing Ivermectin worth $40 but doing nothing about Pfizer not living up to its promise about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine? 165. Can the TGA provide all correspondence with Pfizer regarding the Covid vaccine in regards to purchase agreements, testing and safety concerns? 183. Is the vaccine injury scheme going to be updated to include additional side effects that have been reported to the TGA by Health Professionals rather than Pfizer who have a conflict of interest in reporting side effects from their own drugs? 191. The normal default for contracts is to reserve a “right” to buy. Are these the terms the Pfizer Covid vaccine contract was based on, or do have an “obligation” to buy the Covid vaccines regardless of performance? If so, why did the health department deviate from the normal procedure for a contract that covers Australia’s needs many times over, for a period where all would already be vaccinated (2022 and 2023). 262. The contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need. Is this true? If so, then why is Pfizer hiding from independent scrutiny?

71. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the body produces the Spike protein. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 72. Has the TGA now got comprehensive and exhaustive data that determines how long the spike protein or any other related prions, mutations stay in the body and by body organ type. If not, then why are they allowing the rollout of the vaccine to continue? 73. Do expressed spike proteins stay in the cell membrane or are they secreted via exosomes? 74. The ribosomes on the endoplasmic reticulum produce protein for export while ribosome in the cytoplasm produce proteins for use inside the cell. Given the TGA non-clinical report says the spike protein is produced via the endoplasmic reticulum then isn’t evidence that spike proteins will be exported from the cell and potentially re-enter the circulatory system? 76. Which part of the mRNA code tells the mRNA to attach to the Endoplasmic Reticulum? 77. What evidence does the TGA have that the spike protein doesn’t go into the nucleus – the delivery of the spike protein was never tested. There were no studies carried out so how would the TGA know with 100% certainty the mRNA or the spike protein doesn’t enter the nucleus? 78. Is there any evidence that the spike protein does not inhibit the P53 gene? Were studies carried out to prove this? 79. “Another study revealed that extracellular vesicles decorated with S-proteins persist up to 4 months after vaccination… This raises the possibility that LNP–mRNA remain in circulation for extended periods of time, retaining their ability to induce S-protein expression….”. Does the TGA refute this study? www.mdpi.com/2227- 9059/10/7/1538/htm 87. Have studies been conducted by the TGA to determine if the spike protein interferes with oocytes?

80. In the prior set of estimates Prof Skerrit said that the lipids used in the vaccine are like the lipids you have in a steak for breakfast. This is not the case – as per Pfizers own website they are special ionised lipids designed to cross the cell membrane. Will Prof Skerritt withdraw his prior remark? 81. Lipids are hydrophobic not hydrophilic – by cationising them you have completely changed their characteristics from inactive to active -why did Prof Skerritt mislead the senate when he said the lipids were like the lipids you find in sausages/steak for breakfast? 82. Given these lipids are ionised and therefore an active ingredient what studies have been undertaken to ensure they were not harmful to the human body? 83. What studies were undertaken to ensure that the cationic lipids don’t create reactive oxygen species which can cause irreversible damage to DNA? 84. If the ionic lipids can enter any cells via electroporation or transfection then aren’t they more infectious than the virus which can only enter cells that contain ACE and TMPRRS enzymes that facilitate the virus entering the cell? 85. Can the lipids enter both white and red blood cells? I note that lipids entered both the spleen and bone marrow in the rat studies? 86. Given the lipids are taken up by the ovaries what guarantees can the TGA give that eggs are not being damaged. Obstetricians are reporting that they are seeing clusters of low Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in young women 95. The bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes are responsible for producing white blood cells and regulating the while blood cells in the blood and the lymphatic system. Given that lipids can enter these organs and induce an autoimmune response against the cells in these body organs isn’t there a serious risk that the vaccine can induce autoimmune diseases?

163. Hasn’t Pfizer and Co broken the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by failing to report all the adverse events from their trials and post marketing surveillance (refer to patient records)? Under paragraph 28(5)(ca) of the Act, you MUST retain records pertaining to the reporting requirements and safety for your medicine. (page 29 of 44) 164. What is the legislation that details the TGAs responsibilities in regard to post market safety surveillance data? Why hasn’t the TGA sought to allay the publics fear over data that shows an alarming number of adverse events and poor quality assurance practices? 202. Does the TGA do post marketing surveillance at all over and above that of the sponsor? If not, why not? What is the point of having an independent regulator if it doesn’t do independent safety testing?

166. The AusVax safety data showed over 5 million people reported side effects 3 days after taking the Covid-19 vaccine and around 1 in 100 had to see a doctor or go to emergency just 3 days after taking a vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high? 167. The AusVax safety data says 8% reported missing work, study or routine duties after dose 1 of the Covid vaccine, 21% after dose 2 of the Covid vaccine and 15% after dose 3 of the Covid vaccine. How can the TGA justify the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine when the adverse event rate is so high?

88. FOI 2565 requested “Histopathology/microscopic evaluation of gonads (ovaries/testes) of vaccinated animals in relation to Pfizer and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines”. This application has been rejected three times, and was rejected finally by the internal reviewers on 27 Sep 2021. Why is the TGA withholding reports of ovarian and testicular effects of an investigational (provisionally registered) vaccine. Particularly in the context of vaccine mandates being imposed upon men and women of reproductive age in various occupational sectors, and now on children and teens with their reproductive years ahead of them?

62. Why is Ivermectin banned as a Covid treatment when in the last year it has had a fraction (5) adverse event reports v over 100 adverse event reports from other early treatments such as remdesivir and dexamethasone for example? 63. Why was Remdesivir approved on the basis on a small number of trials with a small sample size? 64. Given the large number of people who have taken Ivermectin in the last six months in treating Covid and the low rate of adverse events in comparison with the Vaccines how can the TGA justify their decision to ban doctors prescribing Ivermectin? 65. Are doctors using Ivermectin in Australian hospitals to treat patients with late stage Covid? 66. If so why can’t Ivermectin be used as an early treatment? 116. Why is the TGA relying on real world data for children, spanning a few months but ignoring real world data on ivermectin that spans over 30 years. 117. According to the TGA search facility there has only been 5 reports of Adverse events against Ivermectin in the last 13 months. Given there has been over 108,000 adverse events against the Covid vaccines why is the TGA claiming that Ivermectin is not safe, when there has been so many more reported events from the Covid vaccines?

163. Given the Covid-19 vaccines are still provisional and the reporting rate is only 2.2 out of 1000 inoculations why isn’t the TGA following up every person to ensure there are no adverse events that are not being reported? 164. Can the TGA define rare in drug development terms? i.e. is a vaccine considered safe if there is one adverse event for every million doses – what are the benchmark rates? 187. Where the TGA declines to acknowledge an adverse event, does the TGA follow up with those people to say why it isn’t an adverse event? 188. A cardiologist has been told by Queensland Health he is unable to lodge adverse events relating to myocarditis- why is that – if a cardiologist can’t lodge myocarditis adverse events who can? 224. In terms of giving the provider number when completing an adverse event notification to the TGA, how does an individual get this if they got it at bunnings or the provider doesn’t want to give it or is longer contactable? 225. Why does the TGA only make adverse event reports available via PDF rather than a csv file? 226. Is the TGA going to provide more reporting optionality with its adverse event data? 227. Can the TGA provide me with read only access to the adverse event database? 228. Does the TGA have its database and database management processes audited by an independent third party? If not why not?

1. In regard to Covid vaccines, how many claims for deaths and injuries have been paid out on, how many outstanding claims are there for deaths and injuries and how many claims re deaths and injuries have been dismissed? 2. Is a non-disclosure agreement a condition of any of these payouts? 3. Is the Indemnity scheme going to be widened given there are more adverse events than recognised by Pfizer in their trials and in light of the fact that Pfizer has is trying to withhold data relating to the trials for up to 55 years? 193. What the conditions around vaccine indemnities given to pharmaceutical companies? If the companies have withheld data that is material to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine do the companies still receive indemnity?

I note that on page 23 and 24 of the Pfizer post marketing surveillance data that the event latency was reported as <24 hours to 41 days with a median of 2 days for stroke, and for neurological events on page 21 range <24 hours to 48 days median 1 day, and for cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction and cardiac failure range a latency range of <24 hours to 21 days and median <24 hours. Because Pfizer failed to detect these vaccine injuries, victims have been denied proper medical attention and had their injuries ignored. Given this data will John Skerritt now admit the Pfizer vaccine can cause strokes and apologise to those who have suffered strokes and other adverse events?

47. Will the TGA ask for the all the data from the Pfizer trial including the data the Pfizer is trying to prevent from releasing to the public for a period of up to 55 years? 48. Has the TGA ask Pfizer for an explanation of why the company does not want to release data for up to 55 years? 49. If the data that Pfizer does not want to release is shown to be materially different in terms of safety and efficacy will the TGA sue Pfizer for damages or does the Pfizer indemnity extend to fraud and or non-disclosure? 50. On what basis does John Skerritt say that the data relating to the vaccine trials is thorough when not all data has been released, individual data wasn’t looked at and several areas including carcinogenic risks, immunocompromised patients, pregnant women, breast feeding women, reactions to other drugs and longitudinal studies weren’t completed? 51. How can the TGA say the Pfizer trial was relevant to the vulnerable population when only 4% of the trial group was over 75 when over 75% of people over 75 were hospitalised or died from Covid? 52. Could the TGA provide measurements of clinical outcomes in the initial Pfizer trial such as hospitalisations and deaths and subclinical outcomes such as inflammation and clotting?

4. Why is the Health Department allowing AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) to censor Doctors and nurses on giving their views on the Covid vaccine? I have spoken to over 100 medical staff who are afraid of being suspended or have been suspended for giving their views on the dangers of the vaccine? 5. If AHPRA is not a government aligned body, then why isn’t the government protecting the right of medical staff to express their view freely without the threat of suspension? 6. I note neither the Chair or CEO of AHPRA are qualified doctors or nurses. Who gives AHPRA the authority to suspend doctors or nurses at a time there is a shortage of them in Australian hospitals for expressing their professional views based on their observations?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard