Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

161. “Pfizer has asked a U.S. court to throw out a lawsuit from a whistle-blower who revealed problems at sites that tested Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer stated that the regulations don’t apply to its vaccine contract with the U.S. Department of Defence because the agreement gives contract holders the ability to skirt many rules and laws that typically apply to contracts.” Pfizer Moves to Dismiss Lawsuit From COVID-19 Vaccine Trial, Citing ‘Prototype’ Agreement (theepochtimes.com) – Has Australia signed a Covid-19 contract with Pfizer that has similar conditions? 162. Why are you penalising Australians $10,000 of dollars for importing Ivermectin worth $40 but doing nothing about Pfizer not living up to its promise about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine? 165. Can the TGA provide all correspondence with Pfizer regarding the Covid vaccine in regards to purchase agreements, testing and safety concerns? 183. Is the vaccine injury scheme going to be updated to include additional side effects that have been reported to the TGA by Health Professionals rather than Pfizer who have a conflict of interest in reporting side effects from their own drugs? 191. The normal default for contracts is to reserve a “right” to buy. Are these the terms the Pfizer Covid vaccine contract was based on, or do have an “obligation” to buy the Covid vaccines regardless of performance? If so, why did the health department deviate from the normal procedure for a contract that covers Australia’s needs many times over, for a period where all would already be vaccinated (2022 and 2023). 262. The contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need. Is this true? If so, then why is Pfizer hiding from independent scrutiny?

Answer:

Question Number: 178
PDR Number: SQ22-000548
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

161 The details of Advance Purchase Agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines are commercial-in-confidence.

162 The controls on the importation of therapeutic goods exist to ensure that only goods subject to regulatory oversight are supplied in Australia to manage these risks. An unapproved medicine sold online and imported may not meet the Australian standard of safety, quality and efficacy, posing a risk to consumers. In Australia, Ivermectin is a prescription-only medicine included in Schedule 4 of the Poisons Standard. The unlawful importation of unapproved prescription-only medicines in particular where the product imported is counterfeit and/or in high quantity, is of particular concern to the health and safety of Australians. We do not believe that Pfizer has “not lived up to its promise on the safety and efficacy of their vaccines”. COVID vaccines are estimated to have saved the lives of about 20 million people globally. Numerous studies and data sources have confirmed the real-world safety and efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) continues to closely monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines as part of the most intensive safety monitoring ever conducted in Australia. Pfizer, like all medicine sponsors, is legally obliged to report serious adverse events and significant safety issues to the TGA within mandated timeframes.

165 A significant number of documents that are relevant to this request have already been released under a previous FOI request (FOI 2389). For documents released regarding Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty, please see the TGA’s Disclosure Log at www.tga.gov.au/foi-disclosure-log. The TGA has also published a range of regulatory documents relating to the provisional approval of each COVID-19 vaccine, including Comirnaty, which provide detailed information regarding the evaluation process and the data that were considered. These include the Australian Public Assessment Report (AusPAR), the Product Information (PI) and the Consumer Medicine Information (CMI), and they are available at: www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccines. The TGA publishes all adverse event reports, including those submitted by sponsors, in our Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN). For COVID-19 vaccines, the TGA publishes regular safety reports which include updates on any emerging safety issues identified with each vaccine (www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19- vaccine-weekly-safety-report). Conditions of provisional registration for all new COVID-19 vaccines in Australia include the submission of monthly safety summary reports for the first six months, and thereafter at the TGA specified interval, and 6-monthly periodic safety update reports (PSURs). Frequency of submission may be increased as required, based on emerging safety information. These reports include summaries of global post-market safety data as summary of interval and cumulative data. To date, Pfizer has provided 19 such reports to the TGA. Conditions of provisional registration for Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine also require the submission of study reports to collect confirmatory safety and efficacy data. These are listed in the AusPAR for BNT162b2 (mRNA) published on the TGA website (www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-210125.pdf). Members of the public can request access to other safety correspondence, safety reports submitted by sponsors including the PSURs and monthly summary safety reports under the Freedom of Information Act 1982. The TGA publishes the batch release assessment of COVID-19 vaccines including testing results at: www.tga.gov.au/batch-release-assessment-covid-19-vaccines Regarding the documents not released via the TGA’s Disclosure Log, the information in the documents is considered commercial in confidence. This information was provided to the TGA for the purpose of evaluating a product during the relevant regulatory processes after the parties had executed a Confidentiality Disclosure Agreement. That is, this information is known only to the TGA and Pfizer. The investment in research and development that is contained in the material offers a competitive advantage to Pfizer that would be reduced if that information was available on the public record and thus to other pharmaceutical companies. 183 The list of eligible conditions covered by the COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme is not determined by Pfizer. This scheme is administered by Services Australia with the Department of Health and Aged Care holding responsibility for policy decisions about which conditions are eligible based on recommendations from the TGA. To be eligible, conditions must be verified by the TGA as moderate to significant clinical conditions listed in the Product Information (PI) document for that vaccine. The TGA has initiated multiple safety updates to the PI documents for COVID-19 vaccines. Changes to the PI are communicated to the public via the COVID-19 vaccine safety report www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-210125.pdf. 191 The details of Advance Purchase Agreements with pharmaceutical companies for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines are commercial-in-confidence.

262 The Department cannot comment on contracts between Pfizer and the United States government.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard