Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

175. What law gives ATAGI the authority to issue rules around Vaccine exemptions to doctors? 176. Studies have shown that natural immunity from Covid has been found to last up to 20 months after infection. Why doesn’t ATAGI recognise natural immunity and antibody tests as a reason to grant an exemption to getting a Covid vaccine? 193. Does Nigel Crawford work for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute? 194. How much do the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other big Pharma organisations pay Nigel Crawford’s employers? 195. Why are there so many Monash employees on the ATAGI board, given Monash receives money from Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? 210. Section 10 then says an advertisement cannot be inconsistent with a public health campaign. If a public health campaign is failing to acknowledge risks, then why is it not okay to highlight those risks – take myocarditis for example where ATAGI knew about the risks but failed to highlight them? 242. Chair of ATAGI, Prof Nigel Crawford – “Previous animal trials of experimental vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV have also been shown to induce a more serious disease when subsequently exposed to the diseases – https://mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanced-disease-vaed/ – given this knowledge why is ATAGI encouraging more booster given what is known about immune imprinting? 288. Is ATAGI aware that students are running hospital wards because of their mandates resulting in staff shortage?

Answer:

Question Number: 197
PDR Number: SQ22-000567
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 175 The role of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) is to advise the Minister for Health and Aged Care on the medical administration of vaccines available in Australia, including COVID-19 vaccines and those available through the National Immunisation Program. Under the Australian Immunisation Register Act 2015 (AIR Act) it is mandatory for all vaccination providers to report all COVID-19 vaccinations administered in Australia to the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR). The ATAGI Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 vaccine providers contains information about contraindications to COVID-19 vaccines, both generally and to the specific vaccines that are currently available in Australia. The medical basis for a medical contraindication to COVID-19 vaccines is based on guidance from the ATAGI.

Currently, there are two valid reasons for reporting a medical contraindication to a COVID-19 vaccine to the AIR. These include: • Anaphylaxis to a vaccine/vaccine component
• Acute major medical illness.

It is important to note that medical contraindications to vaccination are rare. Medical contraindications for COVID-19 vaccines can only be assessed and reported to the AIR by eligible Health professionals, including GPs, paediatricians and infectious disease physicians. Additionally, ATAGI has provided further guidance on medical exemptions to assist vaccination providers, the ATAGI expanded guidance on acute major medical conditions that warrant a temporary medical exemption relevant for COVID-19 vaccines, can be accessed at www.health.gov.au and searching for ‘ATAGI COVID-19 exemptions.’ Whilst the AIR can provide evidence for the medical conditions agreed by ATAGI, states and territories may choose to accept other categories, and other forms of evidence for an exemption to vaccination. While the Government encourages as many Australians to be vaccinated as possible, the Government’s position on COVID-19 vaccination is that it is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia. State and territory public health orders may set mandatory vaccination requirements for certain professions and the limited exemptions that apply. Further information about current public-health orders may be found on state or territory government websites. Question 176 The ATAGI Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 vaccine providers (the Clinical Guidance) contains information about COVID-19 vaccines, both generally and to the specific vaccines that are currently available in Australia. The Clinical Guidance notes that the risk of reinfection with the Omicron variant is very low within the first 3 months following a confirmed infection and all people are recommended to defer COVID-19 vaccination for 3 months after a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. ATAGI notes that natural immunity from past infection may be recognised in several countries overseas, however there are challenges with confirming past infection and uncertainty with regards to the duration of protection. ATAGI advise that vaccination is likely to enhance the protection induced by infection. The interval between infection and vaccination enhances the protection from vaccination by further boosting the immune response, including immune memory response, generated following infection. For people who have been infected and are required to receive COVID-19 vaccination, a temporary medical exemption may be applicable. People should speak with their healthcare provider about what is best for them. Providers are advised to only provide temporary exemptions for a period of up to 4 months after infection. This is due to the increased risk of reinfection after this time. ATAGI continues to review all current and emerging evidence on the use of COVID-19 vaccines, including duration of protection from past SARS-CoV-2 infection, and will provide updated recommendations to the Minister for Health and Aged Care as required. Question 193 ATAGI members’ area of expertise and position is detailed on the Department of Health and Aged Care’s (the department) website at: www.health.gov.au/committees-andgroups/australian-technical-advisory-group-on-immunisation-atagi. Question 194 The department does not hold information on the funding provided by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other pharmaceutical organisations to Australian organisations. Question 195 In order to become a voting member of ATAGI, an expression of interest process is undertaken. A short list is developed by the Australian Government Chief Medical Officer for consideration by the Australian Government Minister for Health across two categories: clinical professionals, researchers and/or service delivery experts, and consumer representatives. ATAGI members are sought based on their in-depth knowledge of vaccines, immunisation and/or service delivery and their expertise in areas such as paediatrics, immunology, infectious diseases (paediatric and adult), public health, immunosuppression in adults, maternal immunisation, and pathology. Researchers bring experience in disciplines supporting the assessment of vaccines and their use in the population, including epidemiology, modelling of infectious diseases, the behavioural factors impacting vaccine uptake, health technology assessment, and systematic reviews of evidence. Immunisation service delivery experts bring experience in General Practice, nurse immunisation, immunisation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and immunisation for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse populations. There are 21 members on ATAGI, several of whom hold positions with Monash Health. ATAGI members’ area of expertise and position and the Policies and procedures for the administration and governance of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation is available on the department’s website at: www.health.gov.au/committees-andgroups/australian-technical-advisory-group-on-immunisation-atagi Question 210 ATAGI continually reviews and closely monitors reports of all adverse events following COVID-19 immunisation including rare but serious cases of myocarditis and/or pericarditis. ATAGI received the first indications of possible cases of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccines towards the end June 2021, from reports from the USA and Israel. In response to this, on 1 July 2021 ATAGI experts, together with cardiologists, met to consider all available evidence including data collected by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) who thoroughly assesses and undertake continual monitoring of safety, quality and effectiveness of all vaccines. The ATAGI Guidance on Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination following COVID-19 vaccination was developed in consultation with cardiologists and other medical experts and published on 2 August 2021. Myocarditis and pericarditis are rare adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccines and can occur in the general population from a variety of causes. Important to note, not all cases that occur are caused by the vaccine. Most cases are mild, and patients recover quickly. ATAGI continually monitor local and international data on myocarditis and pericarditis and update the myocarditis guidance informed by the best available evidence. Most recently this document was updated on 29 September 2022.

Question 242 The department is unable to verify that quote as coming from A/Professor Nigel Crawford. The link provided from the Melbourne Vaccine Education Centre on Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) mvec.mcri.edu.au/references/vaccine-associated-enhanceddisease-vaed notes that: “There is no evidence to suggest VAED is associated with the current COVID-19 vaccines. On the contrary, more COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality has been observed in unvaccinated populations globally. Ongoing surveillance and long-term vaccine follow-up will continue.”

Question 288 The department has not been able to locate evidence of reports that students are running hospital wards because of vaccine mandates resulting in staff shortages. Although the Australian Government encourages as many Australians to be vaccinated as possible, the Government’s position on COVID-19 vaccination is that it is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia. State and territory public health orders may set mandatory vaccination requirements for certain professions and the limited exemptions that apply. Further information about current public-health orders may be found on state or territory government websites. The department recognises the significant challenges and increased demand being experienced in our public hospital systems. The Australian Government is working in close collaboration with states and territories on several short and long-term measures to ease pressure on hospitals, including critical interfaces with primary care, aged care and disability as well as workforce strategy and planning. All Australian Health Ministers are also meeting regularly to discuss the performance of Australia’s health system, including the public hospital system.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard