Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

169. In FOI 2389-3 4.3.3 it says “RNA itself, and the lipids used in the BNT162 vaccines have no carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Furthermore, according to ICH SIA, no carcinogenicity studies are required for therapeutics that are not continuously administered. Therefore, no carcinogenicity studies were performed.’ Why is carcinogenicity not tested if boosters are being continually rolled out? 170. In FOI 2389-3 5.3.1.7 regarding coagulation it says “Increases in fibrinogen levels were detected in all vaccinated animals at the end of dosing phase and were consistent with an acute phase response secondary to immune activation and inflammation at the injection sites.” Given clotting was a recognised side effect of the vaccine on what basis can the TGA rule out strokes and other clotting related events? 249. What is the different 5 cap structure in modified RNA – page 109 FOI 2389-3 – how is this different to the Covid spike protein mRNA cap? 250. FOI 2389-3 page 20 – some LNPs can be twice as big as others 60-120 nano metres Does this mean that some vaccine lipids can be twice as toxic or efficacious, or some people will get twice the dose of others? 251. In the Pfizer Covid vaccine as per FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 – Theorical length is from 1200 to 4500 nucleotides depending on selected antigen – the Coronavirus spike protein has 1273 amino acids – why is the vaccine producing a spike protein almost 4 times larger than the Covid virus?

Answer:

Question Number: 247
PDR Number: SQ22-000617
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 169 Carcinogenicity studies are generally not required under international (ICH) protocols for pharmaceuticals that are administered to patients infrequently (e.g. a few doses per year) or for vaccines or biological medicines. Question 170 Nonclinical studies with the COVID-19 vaccines in laboratory animal species do not indicate potential for causing blood coagulation. Nonclinical toxicology studies were conducted with a single dose or repeated doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in its final clinical formulation as administered to patients. Vaccine doses in the nonclinical studies were very high, up to 200-times the human dose (vaccine dose per kg body weight). These studies did not show any effects of the vaccines on platelets and coagulation parameters (i.e., platelet count/volume/distribution width, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time) or development of blood clots. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) continues to monitor national and international data on the risk of blood clots with COVID-19 vaccination. The TGA has not identified a causal link between mRNA vaccines and the formation of blood clots Question 249 mRNA in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine is capped at the 5’ end using a trinucleotide cap 1 analogue ((m2 7,3?-O)Gppp(m2?-O)ApG) (available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32998157/). The SARS-CoV-2 genome, like all other hCoVs, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, has a m7G-cap structure, m7GpppA1, on the 5? end (available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34281608/). 5? capping of mRNA is important in mRNA stability and efficient translation to protein. The slight difference between the 5’ capping of the vaccine mRNA and viral genome capping has no impact on the structure and properties of spike protein synthesised from the mRNA. Question 250 Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in COVID-19 vaccines and other pharmaceutical products (e.g. ONPATTRO, a short interfering RNA drug product approved in the USA and EU) are present in a range of sizes depending on the product and the size of the mRNA for example. The biological effect of LNPs of different sizes may differ, but efficacy and safety of the approved COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with LNPs in the specified size range have been demonstrated in nonclinical studies, clinical trials and clinical use. The dose for COVID vaccines is based on antigen and LNP weight and contains a consistent amount of mRNA and LNPs. Question 251 The single-stranded mRNA in COMIRNATY encodes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. The reason the theoretical length of the vaccine is larger than the COVID virus is that the sequence of the mRNA was optimized with changes, which does not form a part of the spike protein, to enhance stability and translation efficiency of the vaccine.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard