Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

163. Given the Covid-19 vaccines are still provisional and the reporting rate is only 2.2 out of 1000 inoculations why isn’t the TGA following up every person to ensure there are no adverse events that are not being reported? 164. Can the TGA define rare in drug development terms? i.e. is a vaccine considered safe if there is one adverse event for every million doses – what are the benchmark rates? 187. Where the TGA declines to acknowledge an adverse event, does the TGA follow up with those people to say why it isn’t an adverse event? 188. A cardiologist has been told by Queensland Health he is unable to lodge adverse events relating to myocarditis- why is that – if a cardiologist can’t lodge myocarditis adverse events who can? 224. In terms of giving the provider number when completing an adverse event notification to the TGA, how does an individual get this if they got it at bunnings or the provider doesn’t want to give it or is longer contactable? 225. Why does the TGA only make adverse event reports available via PDF rather than a csv file? 226. Is the TGA going to provide more reporting optionality with its adverse event data? 227. Can the TGA provide me with read only access to the adverse event database? 228. Does the TGA have its database and database management processes audited by an independent third party? If not why not?

Answer:

Question Number: 129
PDR Number: SQ22-000157
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 163

Although some adverse events may go unreported, the extensive data received by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), together with our cooperative arrangements with international regulators, provides a high level of confidence in the TGA’s ability to rapidly identify and respond to safety signals. It is expected that the majority of unreported adverse events are for common and expected reactions.

Vaccination agreements struck between the Commonwealth and GPs providing vaccination services require a commitment from the GP to report all adverse events to the TGA. Furthermore, the TGA has extensively promoted adverse event reporting, and has provided greater access to reporting channels, such as through the NPS MedicineWise Adverse Medicine Events Line for consumers.

In addition to the TGA’s spontaneous adverse event reporting system, the Australian Government is running ‘active surveillance’ programs through AusVaxSafety whereby some people who receive COVID-19 vaccines (or their carers) will be sent follow-up SMS messages with a survey to ask if they have experienced any potential side effects. To 28 February 2022 over 6 million surveys had been completed.

Question 164

The frequency of adverse events is defined as:

o Very common: occurs in more than one in 10 (1:10) participants
o Common: occurs between 1:10 and 1:100 participants
o Uncommon: occurs between 1:100 and 1:1000 participants
o Rare: occurs between 1:1000 and 1:10,000 participants
o Very Rare: occurs in less than one in 10,000 participants.

The frequency of adverse events alone is not used as a measure of safety. The frequency, nature, and severity of adverse events are all considered in the context of the benefits of a medicine or vaccine to determine whether the product meets the TGA’s high standards for safety, efficacy and quality.

Question 187

When an adverse event report is made to the TGA the report is entered into the adverse event management system (AEMS) and the reporter is sent an acknowledgement letter via email (provided an email address is given). If an acknowledgement cannot be sent to the reporter, the report is still included in the AEMS.

All reports received by the TGA are entered into AEMS, and valid reports are accepted. For a report to be valid it must have four key data elements:

1. one or more identifiable reporter(s) (the primary source)—such as their qualification, name, initials, address or contact details (for follow-up),

2. an identifiable patient—we only require sufficient information to be confident there was a patient. For example, one or more of the following is sufficient: patient initials, gender, patient identification number, date of birth, age or age group,

3. one or more suspected medicine(s) or vaccine(s), and

4. one or more suspected reaction(s).

Some reports may be rejected by the TGA or withdrawn by the reporter. However, these reports are still retained in AEMS, but with a case decision of ‘rejected’ or ‘withdrawn’. If further information is received, a new decision can be made on the case, for example to accept the report it if the new information makes it valid. A report may be rejected or withdrawn if, for example:

• The report is identified as a duplicate (this is the most common reason for rejection). In this case, the reporter will be advised of the TGA ID of the ‘master’ report, and both the master and duplicate reports remain in AEMS and are linked together.

• The report is invalid – for example the reporter does not identify a medicine or vaccine as being taken. In these cases, the reporter is normally contacted and requested to provide the missing information that would enable the case decision to be updated to ‘accepted’ in the database.

• The report was submitted in error – in some cases a reporter contacts the TGA to withdraw their report as they have subsequently identified information indicating the event was not related to the reported product. For example, it may be identified that the event occurred prior to a medicine or vaccine being taken, or that the medicine or vaccine was not taken by the patient.

Question 188

At no time has the Government or the Department of Health encouraged healthcare professionals not to report adverse events that patients experience from COVID-19 vaccines to the TGA. Indeed, we encourage the opposite. Anyone can lodge an adverse event report with the TGA, and reports can be made anonymously if the reporter does not wish to be identified.

Question 224

The option to include the provider number in an adverse event report is available. However, it is not a mandatory field and reports can be submitted without this information.

Questions 225 and 226

The TGA is currently working to re-build the Database of Adverse Events Notification (DAEN) and implement functionality to enable export of DAEN data in a csv format. It is expected the rebuilt DAEN will be available in quarter two, 2022. Through the TGA’s Digital Transformation program of work, the TGA continues to improve information volumes available around adverse event reporting. This includes the level of detail provided in the DAEN.

Question 227

No. The TGA adverse event database contains extensive personal information, including sensitive health information, that is collected for the purpose of monitoring medicine and vaccine safety. These data are protected by the Privacy Act 1988. Disclosure of this information for a different purpose would be a breach of our obligations under the Privacy Act.

Question 228

The TGA has engaged independent, external testing to ensure security of the sensitive data transferred as part of adverse event reports from state and territory health departments. Other external audits of the DAEN and its management processes have not been undertaken.

The DAEN is one part of the monitoring system for medicine and vaccine safety in Australia. Safety signal detection using this data aligns with advice from the TGA expert committees and international best practice, including the International Conference on Harmonisation and World Health Organization.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard