Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

4. Why is the Health Department allowing AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) to censor Doctors and nurses on giving their views on the Covid vaccine? I have spoken to over 100 medical staff who are afraid of being suspended or have been suspended for giving their views on the dangers of the vaccine? 5. If AHPRA is not a government aligned body, then why isn’t the government protecting the right of medical staff to express their view freely without the threat of suspension? 6. I note neither the Chair or CEO of AHPRA are qualified doctors or nurses. Who gives AHPRA the authority to suspend doctors or nurses at a time there is a shortage of them in Australian hospitals for expressing their professional views based on their observations?

Answer:

Question Number: 108
PDR Number: SQ22-000088
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

4. All health practitioners in Australia must adhere to a code of conduct for their profession. The codes require all health practitioners to provide sound, evidence-based advice to patients about all treatments, including the COVID-19 vaccination. This means discussing both the risks and benefits.

The code also requires all health practitioners to ensure their personal views do not adversely affect the care of their patient or the referrals they make. Under the codes, practitioners who conscientiously object to providing a treatment are obliged to inform their patients and, if relevant, colleagues of their objection. Additionally, practitioners must not let their objections prevent the patient from seeking treatment from another practitioner.

Practitioners who do not adhere to the code of conduct for their profession may be in breach of the codes and subject to regulatory action. The COVID-19 vaccinations are safe and effective and are a crucial part of the public health response to the pandemic. This is confirmed by the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) published ‘Clinical guidance on the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in Australia’.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and the Board consider all complaints about practitioners seriously and are committed to fair and thorough investigation. Action is only taken where there is a genuine risk to public safety

5. Ahpra is not an Australian Government agency. It is established under complementary Acts passed by each Australian state and territory (Health Practitioner Regulation National Law). Under that state and territory legislation, Ahpra’s primary objective is to ensure public safety in health services provided by registered health practitioners.

The 15 National Boards responsible for regulating each profession are comprised of a mix of registered health practitioners and community representatives. This ensures that clinical and other aspects of practice are considered in the discharge of the Boards’ responsibilities as well as protecting patients from harm.

6. The Agency Management Committee (Committee) is the governing board for Ahpra. The Committee is established under the National Law to set the policies of Ahpra. The Committee also ensures that Ahpra performs its function in a proper, effective and efficient way. The National Law requires the Committee be compromised of at least five members including:

• a Chairperson who is not or has not been registered as a health practitioner under the National Law within the past five years
• at least two people who have expertise in health, or education and training or both, and
• at least two people who are not current or former registered health practitioners and who have business or administrative expertise.

It is important to understand that Ahpra and the Committee provide administrative support to the Boards, so are not directly responsible for the regulation of health practitioners. This is the responsibility of the independent, professional National Boards that they support. These Boards are comprised primarily of health practitioners from the relevant profession. More information on the composition and expertise of the Medical Board of Australia and the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia can be found at:

• www.medicalboard.gov.au/About.aspx, and
• www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/About.aspx respectively.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard