Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

114. There is now a published case report of two adolescent deaths following vaccination due to toxic cardiomyopathy. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35157759/ and one article reporting on cardiac arrest after covid 19 vaccination. https://www.cureus.com/articles/83238-cardiopulmonary-arrest-after-covid-19-vaccination-a-case-report. Will the TGA halt the rollout of the vaccine for children and teenagers given that cardiomyopathy was initially identified as the reported side effect by Pfizer for teenagers? 174. Why did the TGA dismiss the reported and suspected death of a 14 year old girl from the Moderna vaccine as not being vaccine related? 175. If State governments can shut down the country over cases of Covid why wasn’t the vaccine rollout for teenagers halted while the reported death of the 14 year old girl was being investigated? 245. According to FOI 3586 there has been 8 reported teenage deaths to date from the Covid-19 vaccines. Why hasn’t the rollout of vaccines for teenagers and children been suspended in light of these reports?

Answer:

Question Number: 115
PDR Number: SQ22-000122
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 114

Cardiac arrest and cardiomyopathy are not recognised side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines provisionally approved in Australia. This is because there is not currently evidence that the vaccines cause these conditions. The published case reports to date are insufficient evidence for a link between vaccination and these conditions. Please also refer to response to SQ22-000111.

Questions 174, 175, 245

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not disclose details relating to individual adverse event reports to protect patient confidentiality. The TGA’s assessment of reports involves consideration of sensitive information about individuals that may lead to their identification.

The TGA’s ongoing monitoring based on local and global safety data shows that the benefits of the COVID-19 vaccines continue to outweigh the risks. Like other regulators and public health bodies around the world, the TGA has not identified a signal for sudden or unexpected death in teenagers or children following COVID-19 vaccination.

Reporting of an adverse event to the TGA does not mean that the reporting doctor considers that the event was caused by vaccination. The TGA encourages reporting of all significant adverse health events following vaccination, even if there is only a small chance that they were caused by the vaccine. Under state and territory regulations in New South Wales, Western Australia, Queensland, Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory it is mandatory for health professionals to report adverse events following immunisation. As the number of people being vaccinated has increased, so has reporting of fatal events with a coincidental association with vaccination.

The TGA assesses individual adverse event reports with a fatal outcome to assess whether there is evidence that the vaccine could have contributed to the reported cause of death, which may indicate a new safety concern for the vaccine requiring investigation. If a death is referred to a coroner, the TGA may need to wait for the outcomes of coronial processes to complete its assessment of a fatal case.

The considerations for individual causality assessments are included in the response to question 27 (SQ22-000104). Reasons for a case to be assessed as inconsistent with a causal association to immunisation include evidence for other causes of an event that resulted in death, a lack of other evidence for a link between a vaccine and an event, or a body of published evidence against a causal association between a vaccine and an event.

However, at an individual level it may not be possible to establish a definite causal relationship between a particular adverse event and a particular vaccine on the basis of a single adverse event report. Causality assessments may result in a finding of ‘indeterminate’. Regardless of the outcome of the individual causality assessment, the TGA includes fatal adverse event reports in analyses to identify and investigate signals.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard