Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

159. Are all adverse reaction reports and reports of death included on the DAEN – Database of Adverse Event Notifications, the database that is accessible by the public or does the TGA vet adverse reactions before they appear on this database?160. Does the TGA maintain another database AEMS which is where all logged adverse claims entered by the public are stored?161. If so, what is the process and criteria for transferring reported adverse event claims from the AEMS database to the DAEN database?162. In regards to the Covid-19 vaccines, how many reports of adverse events or deaths were not uploaded onto the DAEN database?206. How many databases does the TGA and State Health departments keep in regards to adverse events?207. Are all reports of adverse events from State Health departments uploaded into the TGA DAEN database? If not why not?208. How many reports of adverse events have not been uploaded in the TGA DAEN database from either State Government records or the AEMs database?

Answer:

Question Number: 120
PDR Number: SQ22-000152
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

159. Selected categories of adverse event report that do not contribute to our safety
monitoring of medicines and vaccines approved for use in Australia are excluded from the DAEN. Collectively, these make up a very small proportion of all adverse event reports to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). They are:

  • Reports that are not valid (the criteria for valid adverse event reports are included in the response to question 187 in SQ22-000157)
  • Reports that are withdrawn or that are duplicates (as described in the response to question 187 in SQ22-000157), and
  • Reports for medicines and vaccines accessed via the Special Access Scheme,


Authorised Prescriber scheme, clinical trial notification scheme or clinical trial
exemption scheme are not included, except where the adverse event report
also includes a suspected general marketed medicine or vaccine.

160. Yes. The TGA’s internal database, known as the Adverse Event Management System (AEMS), is a separate database which contains extensive information on all medicine and vaccine adverse events reported to the TGA.

161. Data fields to be displayed in the DAEN are transferred to an intermediary database which is accessed via the DAEN search web interface. This process is automated and transfers the data fields included in the DAEN, with some logic steps applied to improve data quality. For example, if the same medicine or vaccine is entered twice in the same report, it will only appear once in the medicines reported as taken in the DAEN. For adverse event data to appear in the DAEN the case needs to:

  •  be accepted (e.g., not rejected as a duplicate report)
  • not be identified as involving a medicine or vaccine accessed via the Special Access Scheme, Authorised Prescriber scheme, clinical trial notification scheme
    or clinical trial exemption scheme, and
  •  have at least one medicine or vaccine identified as being suspected of causing
    the adverse event (either directly or through an interaction), and
  •  have a report date of more than 14 days ago.


162. 98.3 per cent of reports received by the TGA for COVID-19 vaccines are included in the DAEN, as summarised in the table below.

163. The higher proportion of fatal reports not included in the DAEN is due to the TGA receiving and identifying a higher number of duplicate reports. This is in part due to the higher scrutiny of reports of death related in time to receipt of a vaccination.

206. Questions regarding any adverse event databases held by state and territory health departments should be directed to these departments. The TGA has two main
databases which hold adverse event; AEMS and the database that stores the DAEN
data. In addition, AEMS data is transferred each night to a data store which supports
signal detection and investigation and our data visualisation platform.

207. As stated in response to SQ22-000140, the TGA has well-established processes for sharing reports of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) with all state and
territory health departments. We have confidence in the robust information sharing
processes that are in place, in particular for all AEFI that may have regulatory
significance. Questions regarding any adverse event data not shared with the TGA
should be directed to state and territory health departments.

208. The TGA cannot comment on data not reported to us by state and territory health departments. However, the TGA has received over 70,000 reports from state and territory health departments for COVID-19 vaccines, with over 98.7 per cent of these reports included in the DAEN.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard