Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

105. What was the absolute efficacy (not relative efficacy) in reducing people catching Covid of the Pfizer vaccine in the initial trials conducted by Pfizer? 106. To what extent did the vaccine reduce transmission in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide in terms of absolute numbers? 107. To what extent did the vaccine reduce hospitalisation admissions in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 108. To what extent did the vaccine reduce deaths in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data in terms of absolute numbers. 109. To what extent the vaccine cause inflammation in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result? 110. To what extent did the vaccine cause clotting in the initial Pfizer trials? Please provide the data backing up the result. 113. On the 4th of January 2021, the CEO of Pfizer said the Pfizer vaccine was 100% effective in stopping transmission. This claim was repeated by Health experts in Australia. Will the TGA and the Health Department provide an apology to the Australian people for misleading them?

Answer:

Question Number: 137
PDR Number: SQ22-000150
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

105. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) uses the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) to report vaccine efficacy.

RRR and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) are two ways of looking at the same data. Vaccine efficacy, expressed as RRR, means the vaccine will reduce the risk of infection by the reported percentage irrespective of the transmission setting. It is therefore more meaningful to make vaccine-related regulatory decisions using RRR.

RRR is the endpoint of choice for all vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, as recommended by the European Medicines Agency’s Guideline on clinical evaluation of new vaccines (see: www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-clinical-evaluation-new-vaccines_en.pdf). This international scientific guideline has been adopted for use by the TGA for vaccine evaluation.

Page 20 of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine Australian Public Assessment Report (AusPAR) (available at: www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-210125.pdf) states that among the 36,523 efficacy evaluable participants who had no evidence of existing or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (18,198 in the vaccine group and 18,325 in the placebo groups), eight cases of COVID-19 with onset at least seven days after the second dose were observed among vaccine recipients and 162 among placebo recipients.

106. Page 34 of the AusPAR for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine states that a limitation of the data submitted to the TGA was that vaccine efficacy against viral transmission has not been addressed. However, a number of studies on the impacts of vaccination on disease transmission have been published in medical literature.

107. The primary efficacy endpoint of the initial trial was to prevent COVID-19 (as compared to the placebo) in subjects who did not have prior evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

As hospitalisation was not a primary outcome of the initial trial, it was not directly assessed in the initial trial and no figures are available.

108. No COVID-19-related deaths were observed.

109. The study of vaccine safety at six months did not identify outcomes of inflammation.

110. The study of vaccine safety at six months did not identify outcomes of clotting.

113. The Department of Health (including the TGA) have not misled the Australian public about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines.

The TGA is not aware of any statements from Dr Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, claiming the Pfizer vaccine is 100 per cent effective in stopping transmission. On 13 January 2021 and 3 February 2021, Dr Bourla was quoted as saying animal studies show there is significant protection from transferring the virus, but he said at that time that this has not been proven in humans yet (see: www.thejournal.ie/pfizer-ceo-5323949-Jan2021 and www.bbc.com/future/article/20210203-why-vaccinated-people-may-still-be-able-to-spread-covid-19).

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard