Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

1. Can the Health Department provide studies proving the IgA levels increased in the mucosal system as a result of receiving the Covid vaccine? A Pfizer executive said in a hearing before the European Parliament that no testing was done on the vaccine stopping transmission before going to market. Why did ATAGI and or other health authorities claim the vaccine was going to stop transmission when there were no studies done (as per non-clinical report at least) showing an IgA response? The animal trials in the TGA Non-clinical evaluation reports did not show any testing to measure antibody levels in the mucosal system at all. 2. With over 10 million Covid cases in Australia in 2022, will the TGA and Health Department acknowledge the vaccines were not effective in stopping transmission and infection? 3. In August 2021 when approving the Moderna vaccine, while standing next to the prime minister at Parliament House, John Skerritt made a patently false – and what’s more, a ludicrously false – claim about its effectiveness. It was a claim that has not been withdrawn or ‘clarified’ by the TGA since. It throws into serious question the competence of the TGA and our ability to trust it to provide effective regulation of the vaccines and Covid medications more broadly. These are his exact words, taken from the transcript of the press conference at the PM’s website. “Moderna is even after six months, it’s proving to be 93 per cent efficacious against any infection, 98 per cent against severe disease and 100 per cent against death”. Given the rate of infection, and reported death from the Moderna vaccine with John Skerritt apologise for misleading the Australian public about the effectiveness of the Moderna vaccine?

Answer:

Question Number: 152
PDR Number: SQ22-000521
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 1 IgA levels were not determined in animal studies due to the lack of validated assays. However, extensive studies later demonstrated a strong human IgA response following covid vaccination (available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34133415/, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33288661/, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34136730/, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34960244/). The development of Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation’s (ATAGI) advice is based on a thorough review of all the current and emerging evidence on COVID-19 vaccines, including data on effectiveness, waning of immunity, international program settings, national vaccination coverage and operational flexibility where appropriate. The primary goal of the Australian COVID-19 vaccine program is to minimise the risk of severe disease, including hospitalisation and death, from COVID-19. The secondary aims of the COVID-19 vaccination program are preventing infection and preventing transmission of the virus, where possible.

Since the roll out of the vaccines commenced internationally two years ago a number of articles in major medical journals demonstrating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines have been published. Examples of reports from the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) include:
• In March 2022, the CDC published Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Death — United States, March 2021–January 2022 (Tenforde et al, 2022) (available at: www.archive.ph/lMg77#selection-647.0-647.150).
• In July 2022, the CDC published Effectiveness of 2, 3, and 4 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Doses Among Immunocompetent Adults During Periods when SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 Sublineages Predominated — VISION Network, 10 States, December 2021–June 2022 (Link-Gelles et al, 2022) (available at: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7129e1.htm?s_cid=mm7129e1_w).
• In August 2022, the CDC published Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19–Associated Hospitalizations Among Adults During SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 Variant Predominance — COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, 14 States, June 20, 2021– May 31, 2022 (Havers et al, 2022) (available at: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7134a3.htm?s_cid=mm7134a3_w).
• In August 2022, the CDC updated information on the Benefits of Getting a COVID-19 vaccine (available at: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/vaccinebenefits.html. Question 2 Efficacy and transmission effects of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine have been addressed in the response to Question 2a in SQ22-000421. The primary goal of the Australian COVID-19 vaccine program is to minimise the risk of severe disease, including hospitalisation and death, from COVID-19. On 25 March 2022 ATAGI noted that while protection against severe disease is relatively well maintained after a first booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine, protection against transmission of the Omicron variant may be limited – available at: www.health.gov.au/news/atagi-statement-on-recommendations-on-a-winter-booster-doseof-covid-19-vaccine.

Question 3 The Department of Health and Aged Care (the department) stands by the comments made by Adjunct Professor Skerritt. They were not patently false or misleading, but were absolutely consistent with the data that was available at that time. The statement will not be withdrawn. These data, which was evaluated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), is now published online available at: www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 which is one of the world’s top three medical journals. A total 30,420 volunteers were enrolled in this pivotal phase III clinical trial conducted to support the safety and efficacy of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 14,550 participants received the vaccine and 14,598 received a placebo. The data strongly supported the efficacy of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine:
• 94.1% efficacy at preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared with placebo (11 in vaccinated group, 185 in placebo group), and
• 100% efficacy at preventing severe COVID-19 (0 in vaccinated group, 30 in the placebo group) The data from the six-month follow-up (15,209 participants in the vaccinated group, 15,206 in the placebo group) is also available online at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482810

These data continued to support the initial findings and Adjunct Professor Skerritt’s comments:
• 93.2% efficacy at preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared with placebo (55/15,209 in the vaccinated group, 744/15,206 in the placebo group)
• 98% efficacy at preventing severe COVID-19 (2 in vaccinated group, 106 in the placebo group), and
• 100% efficacy against death (0 in the vaccinated group, three in the placebo group). Variants of concerns have changed multiple times since these studies were conducted and provisional approval granted. In the same press conference in August 2021, Adjunct Professor Skerritt acknowledged that further work on the efficacy of the vaccines against variants was being undertaken by Moderna.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard