Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

83. In an interview with John Laws John Skerrit said about the Covid vaccines: “They have been thoroughly assessed for safety and effectiveness. As people know, there’s a very rare chance of side effects with both vaccines. But these are a few in a million. And so, for 99.99999 per cent of people, these are very safe vaccines.” Given there have been over 100,000 adverse events shouldn’t John Skerrit resign for misleading the public about the safety of the vaccines by implying they had been thoroughly assessed despite the fact Pfizer hasn’t even released all the data relating to the trails (sic)? 84. If there is a one in a million risk, then isn’t it fair to say that the Pfizer trial size of 44,000 (half of which were the placebo group) isn’t big enough to pick up 1 in a million – either it’s an x out of 22,000 figure or probability unknown. John Skerrit can’t say it’s one in a million if there was never a sample size of a million, can he? 85. Medical doctors have informed me they have lodged adverse event reports with the TGA saying that deaths were caused by the vaccines and the TGA have overruled the expertise of the medical doctors. On what basis does the TGA justify overruling the expertise of doctors who actually diagnosed the patient?

Answer:

Question Number: 157
PDR Number: SQ22-000135
Date Submitted: 24/02/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 83

Prior to provisionally approving the COVID-19 vaccines, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) conducted a thorough assessment of the data which includes clinical studies, non-clinical and toxicology studies, as well as chemistry and manufacturing information. The vaccines were provisionally approved because they meet Australia’s high standards for quality, safety and effectiveness.

Reporting of over 100,000 adverse events to the TGA does not indicate that the COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe. Reporting of an adverse event following vaccination to the TGA does not mean that the vaccine caused the event. The TGA encourages health professionals and consumers to report adverse events following immunisation, even if there is only a small chance that the vaccine caused the event.

Under state and territory regulations in New South Wales, Western Australia, Queensland, Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, it is mandatory for health professionals to report all adverse events following immunisation. The high reporting rate for COVID-19 vaccines is a result of the TGA’s activities to promote and facilitate adverse event reporting to support robust safety monitoring, and the intense public interest in the COVID-19 vaccines. Many adverse events reported following administration of a vaccine are simply coincidental and due to other causes, not the vaccine itself.

A large proportion of the adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination reported to the TGA describe expected vaccine side effects (numbers detailed to 20 February 2022), such as headache (29,000 reports), muscle pain (18,000 reports), fever (16,000 reports), tiredness (14,000 reports) and nausea (14,000 reports). In clinical trials these side effects were generally of mild to moderate intensity and resolved within a few days.

Post-marketing surveillance has identified some potentially serious side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines, such as:

  • Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS), which is a rare clotting disorder that may occur after the AstraZeneca vaccine, and in Australia has been reported in two out of every 100,000 people after a first dose and 0.3 out of every 100,000 people after a second dose. In Australia, the risk of dying from TTS after vaccination is about one in a million.
  • Guillain-Barre Syndrome, which is a rare immune disorder affecting the nerves that can result in pain, numbness, muscle weakness and difficulty walking, and has been reported in about one in every 100,000 people following any dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Guillain-Barre Syndrome has also been associated with infections, including COVID-19, and it is expected that some of the reports of this syndrome submitted to the TGA have other causes and are part of the natural background rate of this condition.
  • Myocarditis, or heart inflammation, which has been reported in one to two people in every 100,000 doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Myocarditis may also be related to infections. Most cases reported following vaccination are mild and resolve following treatment and rest.

Since the beginning of the vaccine roll-out to 27 February 2022, about 54 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been given in Australia. The TGA has identified 11 reports where the cause of death was linked to vaccination.

Question 84

At the time of Professor Skerritt’s interview with John Laws in June 2021, over 5 million doses had been administered in Australia so there was very extensive clinical experience with safety.

Post-market monitoring and ongoing studies are continuing to gather data on the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. Since vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines began in early December 2020, just under 11 billion vaccine doses have been administered worldwide, which has allowed extremely rare side effects to be identified through post-market monitoring, such as those described in the response to question 83.

Clinical trials for any new medicine or vaccine may not detect all possible side effects because they do not include enough patients to detect those adverse events that occur very rarely. TGA and other regulatory agencies around the world monitor the safety of medicines and vaccines to contribute to a better understanding of their safety when they are used outside the controlled conditions of clinical trials.

Question 85

Please see response to questions 29-31, SQ22-000105.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard