Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

52. FOI 3471 shows contamination in the batches. Why didn’t the TGA undertake whole genome sequencing on the batches when it was an obvious way to look for contamination? 53. As per the TGA FOI disclosure log that some batches had up to 40% degraded mRNA – what are the potential risks of degraded mRNA in the body and what studies were carried to determine the safety of degraded mRNA? 54. How does the TGA know degraded mRNA isn’t going to produce toxic proteins? 55. How did the TGA undertake batch testing. Are all vials tested and what were the benchmarks especially in regards to tolerance levels? 56. Did the Covid-19 vaccine trail undertaken by Pfizer use batches made via the commercial process or the laboratory process? Are there trials undertaken by Pfizer using the commercial process and if so can they be provided? 57. Can the TGA report batch numbers by number of reported adverse events and reported deaths so people can see which batches had the highest rate of adverse events? 58. Could the TGA please provide evidence that the Covid vaccine batches had the same purity in Australia as what was stated in the manufacturing facility. Could documentation of the signatures and percentage of intact mRNA by both the manufacturer and the TGA please be provided? 59. Why did the TGA approve batches with as low as 60% integrity and how can it guarantee safety of those batches from degraded mRNA and further degradation after transport? 60. Why is the integrity level of batches commercial in confidence? This is a safety issue that Australians should be aware of it is it not? 61. If a batch is only 60% intact and each vial contains 5 doses how can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose? 62. FOI 2389-3 page 110 Table 2 says concentration depends on batch size? How can the TGA be sure that every person is getting a consistent dose?

Answer:

Question Number: 170
PDR Number: SQ22-000539
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

52. The testing results for the specific batches referred to in FOI 3471 met all required specifications and did not suggest any contamination.

53. Animal toxicity studies with vaccine batches with a similar degradation profile to the commercial batches raised no safety concerns. The findings were related to immune responses (e.g. inflammation the injection site, hypercellularity of lymphoid tissues), plus minimal transient, reversible vacuolation in the liver. Batch release studies involve in vitro translation studies for the mRNA in each batch. No truncated or toxic proteins were found.

54. See response to Question 53.

55. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not open and test all vials in a batch as this is logistically impossible given it would involve opening and testing millions of vials and would compromise their sterility and delay availability to patients. TGA batch release for COVID-19 vaccines involves performing multiple tests across multiple vials of vaccine which are drawn from the manufactured batch. When establishing the required specifications i.e. tolerance intervals, a range of data submitted by the Sponsor is reviewed. This includes process and testing data gathered through development and refinement of the manufacturing process (including stability during transport and storage), and various laboratory and clinical studies consistent with international guidelines. Collectively, this means that batches which meet the approved and evidence-based specifications will be of acceptable quality, safe and effective.

56. As is usual during the development of a vaccine, Pfizer submitted documentation to describe the development history of the finished vaccine product. The formulations and processes have remained the same throughout the vaccine development, except for necessary changes to the scale as development has progressed from initial clinical supplies for the clinical trials (small batches) to commercial manufacture (large batches). Batches of vaccine used in clinical studies were directly comparable to large scale commercial batches. Batches used in clinical studies were not manufactured using a laboratory scale process. Information regarding the outcomes of clinical trials conducted are available in the Product Information for the respective products published on the ARTG, available at: www.tga.gov.au/resources/artg.

57. Information relating batch numbers to adverse events has been released under FOI (see FOI 3545 in the TGA disclosure log at: www.tga.gov.au/foi-disclosure-log). However, assessing batch safety on the basis of the number of fatal adverse event reports associated with a batch is not a reliable indicator of safety. The nature of the adverse event reports would need to be considered, as well as other factors that may confound the interpretation of the data. For example, the size and/or distribution of the batch may influence reporting numbers as different batches may have been used in different populations, such as aged care facilities earlier in the roll-out. To date, the TGA has not identified a safety signal indicative of a quality issue for any particular batch of a COVID-19 vaccine.

58. The TGA batch release process reviews the manufacturers testing results, comparable overseas regulatory laboratory testing results (when available) and TGA Laboratories own testing results. TGA reviewed purity test result data from the manufacturer and the TGA Laboratories for abnormal trends and to ensure results are similar from both sources. To date all batches of COVID-19 vaccines have met the required purity specifications and there have been no anomalies in the comparative and trend analysis. The requested documents for individual test results are considered commercial in confidence material and therefore cannot be released unless agreed by the Sponsor.

59. The TGA reviews a range of data submitted by the Sponsor before approving specifications for mRNA vaccines. This includes process and testing data gathered through development and refinement of the manufacturing process (including stability during transport and storage), and various laboratory and clinical studies in keeping with international guidelines. Collectively, this means that batches which meet the approved and evidence-based specifications will be of acceptable quality, safe and effective. This approach was taken when establishing an acceptable specification for the purity and integrity of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

60. The manufacturing process and individual testing methods developed by the manufacturer are commercially sensitive material. While specification limits are are manufacturer-specific, the TGA reviews the compliance of every batch seeking to be supplied in Australia with the approved specification limits. In addition, the TGA compares the manufacturer’s testing results with those obtained from the TGA Laboratories independent testing. To date over 166 batches of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been assessed by the TGA with all batches meeting the approved specification for RNA integrity.

61. Specific instructions are provided in the Product Information for the end user to ensure that the product in each vial is diluted and mixed correctly. The approved and evidencebased specifications ensure each vial will be of acceptable quality, safe and effective. All batches of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have met the specification for purity and integrity.

62. The statement “Depending on batch size” refers to early development batches compared to later development or commercial scale batches which differed in their respective concentrations. Therefore, the concentration of the drug substance does not change or depend on the batch size with respect to what is manufactured and released. To ensure vaccine and dose consistency, the TGA independently assesses the quality of every batch of COVID-19 vaccine supplied in Australia to ensure that the concentration is within approved specifications. For the end user, specific instructions are provided in the Product Information to ensure that the product is diluted, mixed and administered correctly so that each dose contains similar amounts of mRNA (Refer to responses for Questions 178 and 181).

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard