Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

155. There are almost 20,000 serious injuries to date out of 20 million recipients in a 12- month period since the rollout began. This is an injury rate of 1 in 1000 people who have received the vaccine. This higher than the 1 in 3000 Prof Skerrit mentioned in regard to multi-inflammatory disease and also the few in a million side effects he quoted with John Laws. Given the rate of serious injury from the Covid-19 vaccine shouldn’t they be withdrawn? 156. What is the source of Prof Skerritt’s claim that Covid-19 causes multi-inflammatory disease in 1 in 3000 children? Can the source please be provided? 192. According to Moderna serious adverse events were recorded at one in 200 for six months to five years yet the TGA still approved this jab. Why did they do that knowing that the risk of the jab was 15 times greater than multi-inflammatory disease? I note factcheckers are claiming some of the trial participants already had underlying issues and that only one was an adverse event. This is still one in 1760 which is higher than one in 3000. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2209367

Answer:

Question Number: 175
PDR Number: SQ22-000544
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 155 We are unclear about the source of the Senator’s claim that there have 20,000 serious injuries as it does not align with data held by states and territories of the Commonwealth (including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)). So we believe the assertion that there is a serious rate of one in 1000 is wildly inaccurate and a very significant overestimation. Note that injury rates cannot be calculated from spontaneous adverse event report numbers, and it is incorrect to use these data in this way. Publication of an adverse event report in the Database of Adverse Event Notifications does not mean that the vaccine caused the event. Prof Skerritt’s response in an interview with John Laws in June 2021 was in response to an assertion by Mr Laws that Mr Clive Palmer “really did represent misrepresent the facts and the figures” regarding deaths from the COVID vaccines. Mt Palmer had asserted that there had been 210 deaths caused by the vaccines whereas at the time of the interview of a few million people vaccinated there had been only one death associated with vaccination and small number of serious adverse events – hence a “few in a million”. The Department of Health and Aged Care (the department) stands by this statement as accurate at the time it was made.

Question 156 A Danish prospective cohort study (Nygaard et al) published in May 2022 in one of the world’s top medical journals, The Lancet estimated the incidence of multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) at one in 3400 unvaccinated individuals after SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1 in 9900 vaccinated individuals. The estimated vaccine effectiveness against MIS-C after the delta variant was 94% in children aged five–17 years. Question 192 The study cited shows that adverse events seen in children aged six months to five years were mild-moderate, self-limiting and included irritability/crying, redness and/or swelling at injection site, fatigue, fever and muscle pain. Although eight serious adverse events occurred in the six-23 month vaccinated group, only one event was considered to be potentially vaccine-related by study investigators. Therefore, we do not agree with the inference from the Senator’s question that the rate was one in 200. This participant experienced fever and febrile convulsion and was also subsequently found to have a concomitant viral illness. Both fever and febrile convulsion are known adverse effects that are included in the Product Information for this age group. No participants in this age group discontinued the study due to adverse events. This study certainly does not alter the conclusion that the benefits of vaccination continue to greatly outweigh the risk of side effects.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard