Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

163. Hasn’t Pfizer and Co broken the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by failing to report all the adverse events from their trials and post marketing surveillance (refer to patient records)? Under paragraph 28(5)(ca) of the Act, you MUST retain records pertaining to the reporting requirements and safety for your medicine. (page 29 of 44) 164. What is the legislation that details the TGAs responsibilities in regard to post market safety surveillance data? Why hasn’t the TGA sought to allay the publics fear over data that shows an alarming number of adverse events and poor quality assurance practices? 202. Does the TGA do post marketing surveillance at all over and above that of the sponsor? If not, why not? What is the point of having an independent regulator if it doesn’t do independent safety testing?

Answer:

Question Number: 181
PDR Number: SQ22-000551
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 163 The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is not aware of any failure by Pfizer to comply with their reporting or record-keeping obligations related to adverse events and post market surveillance.

Question 164 The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 contains a range of powers for the Secretary of the Department of Health and Aged Care (and his delegates) to undertake post-market monitoring of therapeutic goods. These include, for instance, the power to require the provision of information or documents about therapeutic goods that are approved for marketing in Australia, and the power to impose requirements relating to the public notification and recall of therapeutic goods in specified circumstances. The Act also contains criminal offences and civil penalties that may apply where a person contravenes the Act (e.g. in relation to tampering with therapeutic goods or supplying counterfeit therapeutic goods), and provides for the issuing of infringement notices for alleged contraventions that would constitute an offence of strict liability, or a civil penalty. Regulation 15A of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990, specifies that the sponsor must comply with reporting and record-keeping requirements set out in the “Pharmacovigilance Responsibilities of Medicine Sponsors.” This document describes the reporting and record-keeping requirements and recommended approaches to monitoring, collecting and managing safety data. The sponsor is required to report to the TGA, within 15 calendar days, all serious adverse reactions associated with the use of their medicines that occurred in Australia. The sponsor must keep records of all adverse reactions including non-serious adverse reactions indefinitely for the life of the medicine and for a period of five or 10 years after removal from the ARTG as applicable. The sponsor should include all adverse reactions in their ongoing safety monitoring activities and must report to the TGA, within 72 hours of local awareness, any new safety issues that they detect or become aware of e.g. from international regulatory agencies. Reporting and record keeping obligations for adverse reaction reports and significant safety issues that arise from Australian clinical trials are outlined in the “Australian clinical trial handbook” and the guidance published by the NHMRC: “Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods”. Additionally, all adverse reactions from post marketing surveillance, relevant information from post-authorisation studies or clinical trials in unauthorised indications or populations must be presented in a Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) where one is required or supplied to the TGA upon request in the requested format. As a condition of registration, the TGA requires the submission of monthly summary safety reports for the first six months, and thereafter at the TGA’s specified interval, and six-monthly PSURs for all COVID-19 vaccines that are supplied in Australia. The TGA has published 79 issues of the COVID-19 vaccine safety report. This report provides information to the public about the safety of the vaccine, and communicated information for emerging safety signals, for example with thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome with Vaxzevria, and myocarditis and pericarditis associated with mRNA vaccines. While the Database of Adverse Event Notifications – medicines provides transparency around the adverse events received by the TGA, the COVID-19 vaccine safety report provides context to this information, thereby reassuring the public through the provision of balanced information about the known safety profile of the vaccines, as well as the benefits that vaccination has demonstrated in Australia and internationally.

Question 202 The TGA undertakes a significant amount of post marketing surveillance of therapeutic goods beyond that of the sponsor. The TGA closely monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccines under the most intensive safety monitoring ever conducted of any vaccines in Australia. The TGA relies on its own thorough assessment of the available data to ensure that the Product Information documents provide up-to-date safety information about the COVID-19 vaccines. The TGA’s assessment of vaccine safety is based on careful evaluation of evidence from well conducted clinical trials and robust post-market monitoring. When investigations identify new safety information, the TGA takes prompt regulatory action, which includes requiring the sponsor to update the Product Information used by health professionals, including those administering vaccines.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard