Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

105. If the Federal Health Department doesn’t support mandates, then why is ATAGI restricting exemptions to just a few conditions based on inadequate trials from sponsor who has an inherent conflict of interest? Given the Australian Immunisation Handbook says people can’t be coerced into taking a vaccine how can ATAGI override that by setting rules that completely ignore a person’s individuals characteristics? 106. Myocarditis and Pericarditis are now two well-known risks for young men from the vaccine. Doctors are still refusing to write exemptions for these indications, and I have been contacted by people who have lost their jobs even with an exemption. When will ATAGI lift the exemptions on mandates so doctors are free to issue exemptions subject to their own discretion? 107. Given myocarditis was a known risk for young men as far back as May 2021 why has ATAGI allowed vaccines to be mandated and furthermore still encourage booster uptake knowing it can cause such harm? 108. Dr Christoper Blyth said ATAGI has not provided a recommendation for mandates – is that correct – if so when then why has ATAGI defined the exemptions so narrowly?

Answer:

Question Number: 203
PDR Number: SQ22-000573
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

105. The Australian Government does not impose COVID-19 vaccination mandates and maintains that COVID-19 vaccination is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia. During the COVID-19 pandemic some state and territory enacted public health orders that set mandatory vaccination requirements for certain professions. In making its recommendations on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in Australia, Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) is guided by the best available scientific evidence combined with the collective medical expertise from Australia and overseas and is not limited to data provided by vaccine product sponsors. ATAGI’s recommendations are informed by a thorough review of all current and emerging evidence on COVID-19 vaccines sourced from clinical studies and scientific journals, monitoring of local and international epidemiological data, international program settings, national vaccination coverage and also considers operational flexibility where appropriate. All ATAGI statements are extensively referenced, including links to the best available medical evidence. In respect to temporary and permanent medical exemptions, ATAGI has developed guidance for vaccination providers on the acute major medical conditions that are contraindications to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. State and territories may also accept other categories of exemptions. ATAGI indicate two contraindications that indicate a medical exemption can be reported in the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR). They are a contraindication to all COVID-19 vaccines or an acute major medical illness.

Permanent medical contraindications can be reported to the AIR for an individual where there is:
• previous instance of anaphylaxis (to vaccine/vaccine component), and/or
• significant immunocompromise (live attenuated vaccines only).

Temporary vaccine medical contraindication can be reported to the AIR due to a non-permanent contraindication for the following:
• acute major medical illness
• significant immunocompromise of short duration (live attenuated vaccines only), and
• the individual is pregnant (live attenuated vaccines only).

Further guidance on medical exemptions to assist vaccination providers can be accessed at: www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/atagi-expanded-guidance-ontemporary-medical-exemptions-for-covid-19-vaccines. 106. Myocarditis and pericarditis are rare adverse events associated most often with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines which are known to occur more commonly among younger people aged 16-40 and among males and more likely after the second dose. Importantly, most myocarditis and pericarditis linked to mRNA vaccination has been mild and patients have recovered quickly. ATAGI advises the benefits of vaccination in protecting against COIVD-19 greatly outweigh the rare risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, however younger people (particularly males) aged under 40 years are encouraged to speak with their usual healthcare provider about the benefits and risks of a booster dose. ATAGI advise people with a history of myocarditis or pericarditis can receive a COVID-19 vaccine, but should consult a GP, immunisation specialist service or cardiologist about the best timing of vaccination and whether any additional precautions are recommended. More information is located on the department’s website at: www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/covid-19-vaccination-guidanceon-myocarditis-and-pericarditis-after-covid-19-vaccines. Authorised medical practitioners use their clinical judgement to determine an individual’s eligibility for a medical exemption. See additional information on medical exemptions in response to Question 105. ATAGI has no role in determining or imposing COVID-19 vaccination mandates and maintain that COVID-19 vaccination is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia. Under public health orders, states and territories and some individual employers may impose mandates. See additional information on this in response to Question 105. 107. ATAGI has no role in determining or imposing COVID-19 vaccination mandates. COVID-19 vaccination is voluntary, as are all vaccinations in Australia. ATAGI advises the benefits of vaccination in protecting against COVID-19 greatly outweigh the rare risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, however younger people (particularly males) aged under 40 years are encouraged to speak with their usual healthcare provider about the benefits and risks of another dose. Importantly, most myocarditis and pericarditis linked to mRNA vaccination has been mild and patients have recovered quickly. Additionally, not all cases of myocarditis and pericarditis that occur are caused by the vaccine, these conditions occur in the general population from a variety of causes. ATAGI continually reviews and closely monitors local and international data and reports of all adverse events following COVID-19 immunisation including rare but serious cases of myocarditis and/or pericarditis. ATAGI’s Guidance on Myocarditis and Pericarditis following mRNA vaccination is informed by the best available evidence. Most recently this document was updated on 29 September 2022. 108. The Department of Health and Aged Care can confirm that ATAGI has no role in determining or imposing COVID-19 vaccination mandates. More information on ATAGI’s role is located on the department’s website at: www.health.gov.au/committees-and-groups/australian-technical-advisory-group-onimmunisation-atagi-covid-19-working-group#:~:text=Contact- ,Role,of%20Health%20and%20Aged%20Care In respect to medical exemptions, ATAGI advise that contraindications to COVID-19 vaccines are rare. If someone cannot receive one COVID-19 vaccine, they are often able to safely receive another. Consequently, the medical circumstances for a person to receive a medical exemption is rare. Authorised medical practitioners use their clinical judgement to determine an individual’s eligibility for a medical exemption. More information on ATAGI’s guidance on medical exemptions is located in response to Question 105.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard