Question Number: 208
PDR Number: SQ22-000578
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health
Question 203 It is incorrect and misleading to infer that the paper by Fraiman et al ‘highlights the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000”. This paper was not designed to confirm vaccine-related harm and is not a formal harm-benefit analysis. The authors confirm that this preliminary analysis cannot be used to compare benefits and harms of vaccination programs for several reasons. The authors state that they only compared the number of individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 against the number of serious events. Some individuals experienced multiple events whereas hospitalised COVID-19 participants were likely only hospitalised once, biasing the analysis towards exhibiting net harm (or excess harm). Furthermore, most serious adverse events that contributed to the results in the paper are relatively common events in the background population and no individual patient data (or causality) assessments are completed as part of this analysis. The primary conclusion of the paper is the need for further analysis due to the limitations of the paper.
Question 219 This previous Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) statement is out of date and has been grossly misrepresented in the current question. Since 3 March 2021, the TGA has consistently published a vaccine safety report (previously published weekly and currently published fortnightly) for the Australian public which outlines current rates of adverse event reporting and identifies new safety issues identified by the TGA. This includes regular reporting on the rates of myocarditis and articles on emerging issues including menstrual disorders. The latest safety report can be found here: www.tga.gov.au/news/covid-19- vaccine-safety-reports/covid-19-vaccine-safety-report-17-11-2022#myocarditis-andpericarditis-with-mrna-vaccines
Question 280 The TGA’s vaccine safety monitoring system is rapidly detecting, investigating, and responding to emerging safety issues identified for COVID-19 vaccines. Health professionals and consumers form a key part of this system through the reporting of their experiences to the TGA. The TGA uses this data to look for patterns that may indicate an emerging safety issue for a vaccine. If a new issue is identified, the TGA undertakes appropriate regulatory action which may include updating the known adverse effects in the Product Information document for that vaccine. In addition, we agree that there is massive and global real world safety and effectiveness data on the vaccines now available, subject of a large number of publications in top-tier medical journals, which accurately depict the nature of and rates of serious adverse events. Outcomes of the TGA’s COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring system are published fortnightly and are available at the link noted in response to question 219 above.