Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

203. Professors from UCLA and Stanford have highlighted the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000. How can the TGA refute these prestigious institutions – Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN 219. In a previous QON the TGA stated “Since these vaccines were granted provisional approval, more than 11 billion people have received doses of COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. Data on real-world use of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia provides reassurance about their safety and that the trials were carried out correctly. This is supported by reviews of safety data by international medicines regulators in countries with extensive COVID-19 vaccine experience who have found no new safety concerns associated with the use of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the TGA’s monitoring program has not detected any new safety signals in relation to COVID-19 vaccines to date?” This reply is a blatant lie that will be reported for contempt. A number of side effects have been reported such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding. Why is the TGA covering up serious side effects from the mRNA Covid vaccines? 280. Given the Covid vaccine trials were so short in duration why does the TGA take the sponsors word as to what side effects are and ignore real world data being reported

Answer:

Question Number: 208
PDR Number: SQ22-000578
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 203 It is incorrect and misleading to infer that the paper by Fraiman et al ‘highlights the risk of vaccine injuries at 11 in 10000”. This paper was not designed to confirm vaccine-related harm and is not a formal harm-benefit analysis. The authors confirm that this preliminary analysis cannot be used to compare benefits and harms of vaccination programs for several reasons. The authors state that they only compared the number of individuals hospitalized for COVID-19 against the number of serious events. Some individuals experienced multiple events whereas hospitalised COVID-19 participants were likely only hospitalised once, biasing the analysis towards exhibiting net harm (or excess harm). Furthermore, most serious adverse events that contributed to the results in the paper are relatively common events in the background population and no individual patient data (or causality) assessments are completed as part of this analysis. The primary conclusion of the paper is the need for further analysis due to the limitations of the paper.

Question 219 This previous Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) statement is out of date and has been grossly misrepresented in the current question. Since 3 March 2021, the TGA has consistently published a vaccine safety report (previously published weekly and currently published fortnightly) for the Australian public which outlines current rates of adverse event reporting and identifies new safety issues identified by the TGA. This includes regular reporting on the rates of myocarditis and articles on emerging issues including menstrual disorders. The latest safety report can be found here: www.tga.gov.au/news/covid-19- vaccine-safety-reports/covid-19-vaccine-safety-report-17-11-2022#myocarditis-andpericarditis-with-mrna-vaccines

Question 280 The TGA’s vaccine safety monitoring system is rapidly detecting, investigating, and responding to emerging safety issues identified for COVID-19 vaccines. Health professionals and consumers form a key part of this system through the reporting of their experiences to the TGA. The TGA uses this data to look for patterns that may indicate an emerging safety issue for a vaccine. If a new issue is identified, the TGA undertakes appropriate regulatory action which may include updating the known adverse effects in the Product Information document for that vaccine. In addition, we agree that there is massive and global real world safety and effectiveness data on the vaccines now available, subject of a large number of publications in top-tier medical journals, which accurately depict the nature of and rates of serious adverse events. Outcomes of the TGA’s COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring system are published fortnightly and are available at the link noted in response to question 219 above.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard