Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

260. The UK has pulled the vaccine for pregnant women – Why isn’t Australia doing the same thing? 264. FluVax was introduced in 2010. A few babies died from it, some were severely and permanently injured, and 1 in 10 children suffered an adverse event, The vaccine company (CSL) denied responsibility for as long as they could, before the evidence was overwhelming. Why are Health departments continuing with the Covid vaccine rollout that have higher injury rates? There are numerous other examples of where drugs have been pulled on far fewer safety signals.

Answer:

Question Number: 255
PDR Number: SQ22-000625
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

260. Vaccination with primary and recommended booster doses is the best way to reduce the higher risk of severe COVID-19 in unvaccinated pregnant women. The United Kingdom Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advice is that pregnant women are more at risk of severe COVID-19 disease and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Royal College of Midwives and the UK National Health Service strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant and breastfeeding women. In the United Kingdom, an autumn booster is being offered to those at high risk of the complications from COVID-19 infection, who may not have been boosted for a few months. This includes pregnant women. Information on these recommendations can be found here:  www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-women-ofchildbearing-age-currently-pregnant-planning-a-pregnancy-or-breastfeeding/covid19-vaccination-a-guide-on-pregnancy-and-breastfeeding – www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/keeping-well/pregnancy-and-coronavirus/. A BBC News article from 1 September 2022 outlines the misleading claim that the UK government had suspended vaccination for pregnant women came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. available at www.bbc.com/news/health-62739554. This is supported by the COVID-19 vaccination decision guide for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy, which notes that pregnant women were not included in the first clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines, so at the time of initial guidance there was limited evidence confirming the safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. The initial advice from immunisation expert groups was therefore cautious, and COVID-19 vaccines were not routinely recommended in pregnancy. Over time, real-world’ evidence from other countries has accumulated and reports show that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines Pfizer and Moderna are effective and very safe to use in pregnancy. On 9 June 2021, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) released a joint statement with Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) recommending that pregnant women be routinely offered Pfizer mRNA vaccine (Comirnarty) at any stage of pregnancy, due to the risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 is significantly higher for pregnant women and their unborn baby. The COVID-19 vaccination decision guide for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy is available on www.health.gov.au using the search term “pregnancy decision guide”. 264. The safety of the Australian population has always been the Australian Government’s highest priority. For this reason, decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccines have been, and continue to be, based on the expert medical advice of ATAGI and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The development of ATAGI’s advice is based on a thorough review of all the current and emerging evidence on COVID-19 vaccines, including data on effectiveness, waning of immunity, international program settings, national vaccination coverage and operational flexibility where appropriate. ATAGI continuously monitors and reviews all emerging evidence on COVID-19 vaccinations and adverse events and updates its recommendations as required. The TGA collects adverse event reports directly from health professionals and consumers, as well as through state and territory health departments, other Australian vaccine safety organisations and vaccine sponsors. Adverse events reported to the TGA may not be caused by the vaccine. Adverse events are suspected by the reporter of possibly being related to the vaccine, but this relationship is usually not certain – the event may be coincidental. The TGA reviews adverse event reports to look for any patterns that indicate a possible safety issue that should be investigated. This includes thoroughly investigating these issues to determine what action is required, if any, to maintain public safety.??? Vaccination against COVID-19 is the most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from infection. The protective benefits of vaccination far outweigh the potential risks. Like all medicines, COVID-19 vaccines may cause some side effects. The most frequently reported include injection-site reactions (such as a sore arm) and more general symptoms, like headache, muscle pain, fever and chills. This reflects what was seen in the clinical trials. TGA is publishing regular COVID-19 vaccine safety reports including information about reported suspected side effects and other safety information from Australia and overseas. These are available at: https://www.tga.gov.au/news/covid-19-vaccine-safety-reports The most recent TGA COVID-19 vaccine safety report shows an adverse event reporting rate of 2.1 per 1,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses as at 13 November 2022. TGA collaborates closely with national stakeholders on COVID-19 vaccine safety activities and issues, including the ATAGI, the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), the Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination in the Community (SAEFVIC) and the Adverse Events Following Immunisation – Clinical Assessment Network (AEFI-CAN).?? NCIRS publishes regular reports of findings from active post-vaccination surveillance through AusVaxSafety, available at: www.ncirs.org.au/ncirs-covid-19-response/covid-19- vaccine-safety-monitoring-ausvaxsafety The issue of fever and febrile convulsions in children under five who received trivalent influenza vaccination in 2010 was thoroughly investigated by the TGA and the department. A number of public communications about this topic are available on the TGA website.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard