Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

171. What role does Adjutor play in regulating and approving vaccines – has the TGA outsourced regulatory activities to a third party? 177. Why has the TGA allowed Pfizer/Moderna to set integrity and purity requirements? 265. Why is the Health Department claiming the approval process for the vaccines wasn’t rushed when in fact it was. Furthermore no carcinogenic, genotoxicity or longitudinal studies were completed. And I quote: “The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally approved these vaccines after a complete assessment of all the available data. This is the same process as any vaccine approved in this country. The TGA will only register and approve a COVID19 vaccine if it is safe and effective.” www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-truewere-covid-19-vaccines-rushed-through-approvals-or-given-emergency-useauthorisations-in-australia.

Answer:

Question Number: 257
PDR Number: SQ22-000628
Date Submitted: 21/11/2022
Department or Body: Department of Health

Question 171 •
– The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is Australia’s regulatory authority for therapeutic goods. •
– Adjutor Healthcare (www.adjutor.com.au) is a privately owned regulatory affairs consulting company and does not have any role in the approval or regulation of vaccines. Adjutor Healthcare acts on behalf of a number of pharmaceutical companies who have medicines entered in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG).

Question 177 •
– Pfizer and Moderna have not set vaccine clinical trial integrity and product purity requirements. All clinical trial results submitted to the TGA must comply with the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. This is an internationally accepted standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting of clinical trials. Compliance with the Guideline is a condition of approval for the conduct of a clinical trial. It provides assurances that clinical trial data is ethically obtained, credible, accurate, and that the rights, safety, and confidentiality of trial subjects are protected. Similarly, TGA laboratories conduct independent batch testing on each batch of COVID-19 vaccines.

Question 265 •
– Due to the urgent nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, TGA expedited the review of the vaccines by having significant teams of scientists and doctors evaluate the data submitted in parallel (different parts of the dossier) rather than in sequence and also allowed the submission of rolling data by the sponsors. In addition, the teams worked long hours on the evaluations including evenings, weekends and public holidays. This enabled the overall timeframes for vaccine evaluation to be reduced. •
– The TGA’s provisional approval pathway, which existed prior to the pandemic, was introduced under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 to enable earlier access to promising new medicines while data on longer term efficacy and safety are still being gathered. •
– Each of the provisionally approved COVID-19 vaccines available in Australia have been evaluated by the TGA to ensure that they meet Australia’s high standards of safety, quality and efficacy based on the information available at the time of application. A team of technical and clinical experts at the TGA carefully evaluate the data submitted by the sponsor, to ensure that strict safety and efficacy thresholds are met. Advice is also sought from an independent expert committee, the Advisory Committee on Vaccines, before a regulatory decision is made. •
– As part of the provisional approval, sponsors are required to continue to submit longer-term evidence to the TGA. These studies are continuing to gather data on longer-term safety and effectiveness to complement post-market monitoring and spontaneous adverse event data. Ongoing assessment of vaccine safety is an integral part of the provisional registration process and the TGA is closely monitoring adverse events in Australia. Vaccine sponsors are required to conduct robust safety and effectiveness monitoring (pharmacovigilance) and risk minimisation activities with legislated reporting requirements.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard