Stay up to date...

QUESTION ON NOTICE

Question:

1. What are the rules and regulations around measuring Carbon emissions? 2. Who sets the rules and regulations for measuring Carbon emissions – Australia or a foreign organisation? 3. Who will audit these rules and regulations? 4. How will Australia ensure that other countries are applying the same standards around measuring CO2 emissions to ensure that Australian businesses aren’t at a competitive disadvantage?

Answer:

Question Number: 31
PDR Number: AI-31
Date Submitted: 22/02/2022
Department or Body: Industry, Science, Energy and Resources

1. As a Party to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), its Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement (the UN climate treaties), Australia measures and reports its greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the rules and guidelines set out in decisions adopted under those UN climate treaties.

As such, Australia estimates its greenhouse gas emissions using methods consistent with guidelines prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), including the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC 2006).

Consistent with these rules and guidelines, Australia submits an annual National Inventory Report to the UNFCCC that provides estimates from 1990 onwards of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks across Australia’s economy.

At a domestic level, the Commonwealth National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act) requires companies whose emissions or energy use exceed specified thresholds to report their emissions from energy, industrial and waste sources in accordance with methods set out in the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008. These methods are designed to be consistent with IPCC emission estimation guidelines in order to support implementation of Australia’s emission reporting obligations under the UN climate treaties.

2. Decisions under the UN climate treaties, including on the emission estimation and reporting rules, are taken on a consensus basis by countries who are Party to each treaty in the context of that treaty’s annual conference or meeting of the parties. Australia is an active participant in these negotiations, ensuring decisions taken reflect our national circumstances and technical expertise.

The NGER Act company-level emission estimation and reporting rules are made by the Australian government, subject to review by Parliament.

3. The UN climate treaty rules are periodically reviewed by the treaties’ Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice, comprising the Parties to the treaties. The first review of the Paris Agreement rules will take place no later than 2028. These reviews will be informed by updates to emissions estimation guidance prepared periodically by the IPCC’s Taskforce on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The updates will also take into account input from countries on their experiences implementing rules, including updates and improvements to be made. Australia works closely with like-minded countries in these processes to ensure rule updates reflect our interests and national circumstances.

The company-level emission estimation and reporting rules under the NGER Act are reviewed each year by the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, in consultation with the NGER Act administrator the Clean Energy Regulator, with proposed amendments customarily subject to public consultation before they are made.

4. Each Party’s National Inventory Report is published on the UNFCCC website. Under the Paris Agreement, all countries are required to prepare national inventories applying the same rules and standards and each National Inventory Report will be subject to a technical expert review performed by a team of international inventory experts selected by the UNFCCC secretariat. The review will assess the Report’s consistency with the emissions estimation and reporting rules and guidance.

The results of the technical expert review will be published and submitted, along with the Party’s National Inventory Report and other information, for consideration by the Parties in accordance with the Paris Agreement’s Facilitative, Multilateral Consideration of Progress process (FCMP). The FCMP is a multilateral peer-review process allowing countries to ask questions of each other to better understand information reported and to hold each other to account for implementing the Paris Agreement.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

LATEST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Senator RENNICK: Okay-last question. I had a conversation with Gavin Morris a couple of years ago about the way the ABC reports the increase in temperature from 1910. The ABC, like many other media organisations, reports the homogenised data without actually explaining the difference between the homogenised data and the raw data. Gavin Morris stressed that they reported the raw data. That is incorrect; the ABC reports the homogenised data. So I’ll ask this question again: why won’t the ABC distinguish between the raw data and the homogenised data, which is a different dataset to the actual observations recorded by the bureau? Mr Anderson: I don’t know the answer to that. I will need to take that on notice and provide a response to you. Senator RENNICK: Okay. I would like to point out that Gavin Morris did say last time that they reported the raw data and that they distinguished between raw and homogenised. I’ll stress this again, the ABC doesn’t, but I think in terms of full transparency they should.

Senator RENNICK: Do we have any costings for storage? How much will it cost, in terms of storage, to get to our 2030 target? Mr Duggan: A lot of this is, of course, private provisions. In fact, you’d hope that the vast majority of it was. Government has policies that would assist thatSenator RENNICK: That is fine, but we’re told every day that renewables are cheaper. I want that quote substantiated by proper costings, whether it’s funded publicly or privately, because it’s going to end up either out of the taxpayer’s pocket or on their energy bill. So I’m looking for costings just on storage. I want it on other issues as well, such as transmission, but I’m asking: do you have costings on that storage? Ms Brunoro: We’ll take that on notice. The difficulty with answering that question with any kind of precision is that, in terms of deep storage, it will relate to a number of technologies-it’s the same for deep and shallow. It will ultimately depend on the precise mix of those, but we can do things at a high level with respect to the nature of the type of storage that fits within that and provide some estimates to you. Senator RENNICK: So you don’t have definite figures at the moment? Mr Duggan: What we can do for you-and we’ll have to take this on notice-is look at the existing pipeline of projects that are underway and what the private proponents have told us about the cost of those things. We can add to that: through Rewiring the Nation or other policies that are helping to assist that, we can break down the government contribution to that. But we just don’t have all that detail in front of us. Senator RENNICK: I want government and private, because, ultimately, it going to cost the consumer through taxes or energy bills. But is that fair to say that that’s not completed yet? Mr Duggan: We will take that on notice and we’ll endeavour to do our best to come back to you.

Senator RENNICK: Thanks very much. Yet again, in terms of the overall modelling, have you got a breakout of how many turbines you need, how many solar panels you need to get to 82 per cent renewables? Ms Brunoro: Again, the Integrated System Plan does provide an indication of the type of the level of renewable energy, so just bear with us a second. Mr Peisley: Sorry, I don’t think we do have that figure in front of us. We’re happy to take it on notice and get it to you. Ms Brunoro: But if it gives you a sense of it, it’s nine times the amount of the existing variable renewable energy that currently is-well, as of when the last Integrated System Plan came out, it was operating in the NEM at that point. So that gives you the quantum ofSenator RENNICK: So nine times what? Ms Brunoro: Nine times. Senator RENNICK: Yes, but what? Ms Brunoro: The variable renewable energy that is currently in the National Electricity Market. Senator RENNICK: So what’s the cost of that? Ms Brunoro: Again, Senator, it depends on the mix of technologies that you’re going to deploy. There are some figures that we can pull out for you around what they roughly think around different-solar versus wind for instance. We can actually seek to provideSenator RENNICK: So can you give me some definite costings on that? Not now, but on notice?

1. According to the December 2020 update, Australia emitted 499 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to a 5 per cent decrease on 2019. Australia’s grasslands are estimated to be 440 million hectares and native forest 147 million hectares, a total of approximately 587 hectares. It is estimated forest and grasslands absorb between 0.5 and 2 tonnes of carbon per hectare. Assuming an average of 1 tonne of CO2 absorbed by these landscapes then isn’t Australia already at net zero? 2. Can the CSIRO provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030? This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a given wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission, and storage products and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included. Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined. Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 3. If the CSIRO cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them? 4. Could the change in Earth’s temperature as a result of Australia undertaking the 43% reduction in CO2 measures please be stated in order to ensure appropriate benchmarking and accountability if targets are not met? 5. Could the CSIRO confirm if every country uses the same methods to calculate CO2 emission and reductions? If not, why not? What guarantees are there under the Net Zero that Australia won’t be disadvantaged as a result of signing up to the Net Zero pledge?

1. Can the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water provide a comprehensive roadmap of the work required for Australia to meet a 43% reduction in CO2 by 2030. This roadmap should set out the length of transmission lines, the number of transmission towers, the number of solar panels (for a give wattage), the number of wind turbines (for a given wattage), the number of batteries (for a given storage), the amount of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, concrete, and steel etc. needed to build the aforesaid generators and storage. It will need to include the amount of land needed for solar, wind, transmission and storage products, and the biodiversity offsets. Could the amount of CO2 required to build, recycle, or dispose of the aforementioned items also be included? Likewise, could the cost of building, recycling, and disposing of the aforementioned items also be clearly outlined? Biodiversity impacts such as increased tyre wear due to heavier batteries in cars, increased breaking distance on roadkill, impact on bats and birds from transmission lines and wind turbines, and removal of native flora and fauna due to land use should also be clearly outlined. 2. If the Department cannot provide, can it state which department is responsible for maintaining and tracking the roadmap and refer the question onto them?

THE ISSUES

Click on an interest area to read articles and learn more about the work I am doing in Parliament.

Taxation, Finance & Economy

READ MORE

Education & Family

READ MORE

Energy

READ MORE

Environment

READ MORE

Health, Aged Care & Seniors

READ MORE

Primary Industries

READ MORE

Immigration & Foreign Affairs

READ MORE

Infrastructure, Manufacturing, Transport & Tourism

READ MORE

Defence

READ MORE

Federation Reform

READ MORE

I may get kicked off social media soon for speaking too much truth so please join my mailing list so we can always stay in touch...

Thank you,

Gerard